• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

SSR resignalling

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,377
Location
JB/JP/JW
Aldgate is not due to transfer until 22/23 February.
This morning a point failure in the CBTC area suspended Metropolitan services for a while, so failures will still occur

Worth noting that the failure was not related to CBTC and would have occurred with or without resignalling.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,194
Since the last stage of resignalling was commissioned, the service on the south side of the circle has been notably worse. There are often gaps in the service westbound am peak of up to 10 minutes. Lots of muttering on the platform from punters.

Is this related to the resignalling or pure coincidence?
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,194
Circle Line services are scheduled to be every 10min during peak periods.

Sorry I didn’t make myself clear - 10 minute gaps in all services, Circle and District. I’m not sure how issues west of Edgware Road could affect the District, but something is happening!
 

londonboi198o5

On Moderation
Joined
28 Dec 2010
Messages
449
Circle line frequency is every ten minutes
And district line Edgware Road to Wimbledon is every ten minutes
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,194
Perhaps I’m still not making myself clear.

On the south side of the Circle. Let’s say Blackfriars (as that’s where I was).

Gaps of 10 minutes in all services westbound. Ie no train for 10 minutes, District or Circle. Of course that means that the first one, often 2 are impossible to board. So it is quicker to walk to Westminster than wait.

The frequency there is, IIRC, 2-3 mins (24tph?)
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,397
Location
0035
I’ve not experienced this but can’t see how it would be related to signalling upgrade as the District line services on the main route (Upminster to Ealing Bdy/Richmond/Wimbledon) are not affected by the upgrade.

Also worth pointing out that many of the present issues relate to items at the boundary, so as the works progress and fewer system changeovers are required, reliability should improve.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,194
I’ve not experienced this but can’t see how it would be related to signalling upgrade as the District line services on the main route (Upminster to Ealing Bdy/Richmond/Wimbledon) are not affected by the upgrade.

Also worth pointing out that many of the present issues relate to items at the boundary, so as the works progress and fewer system changeovers are required, reliability should improve.

The only thing I could think of was if some H&C trains were running into trouble, they might be turned back short on the east side or even Moorgate, causing extended dwells west of Barking for the District, causing bunching, and some bigger gaps in front of the first affected.

I assume that stock / drivers do not interwork between the H&C and district on the east side.
 

LU_timetabler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2017
Messages
165
I don't see how gaps of 10 mins on the south side of the Circle can have anything to do with the new signalling, it is far more likely to be a District problem back up the line, which caused a gap to occur. I think it is probably a coincidence. I know there have been a number of signalling failures at places such as Aldgate, Minories Junction and Tower Hill on the old equipment over the past several weeks / couple of months.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,194
It was the same again this morning. 7 minute gap heading west from Blackfriars - albeit ‘advertised’ as a 3 minute gap on the boards. It simply wasn’t like this before the Resignalling.

I have it on very good authority that reliability on the sub surface generally has declined considerably since the resignalling.
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
I don't see how gaps of 10 mins on the south side of the Circle can have anything to do with the new signalling, it is far more likely to be a District problem back up the line, which caused a gap to occur. I think it is probably a coincidence. I know there have been a number of signalling failures at places such as Aldgate, Minories Junction and Tower Hill on the old equipment over the past several weeks / couple of months.
The circle is scheduled to run every ten mins, if you mean district line services then that is another question, these are not affected currently by the new signalling.
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,377
Location
JB/JP/JW
I don't see how gaps of 10 mins on the south side of the Circle can have anything to do with the new signalling, it is far more likely to be a District problem back up the line, which caused a gap to occur. I think it is probably a coincidence. I know there have been a number of signalling failures at places such as Aldgate, Minories Junction and Tower Hill on the old equipment over the past several weeks / couple of months.

Quite easily. As I've pointed out before, you really should come and spend some time with the operational part of service control, because you really don't know what you're talking about...
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Is it possible that the installation of new signalling equipment has inadvertently disturbed long-untouched parts of the old installation, thus increasing the general rate of failure but with no specific cause?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
The piece in the latest Modern Railways about SSR re-signalling progress includes an endstate frequency diagram, and it still shows a 4tph Olympia shuttle. I thought this had been permanently ended, except for the various start and end of service trains, and the possibility of special services during certain exhibitions.

Has the article’s author used out of date info?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
Sounds like it. There are no plans to reinstate a full Olympia shuttle at this stage.
Yes, I was fairly sure the decision post dates a lot of the online information that’s knocking around. There’s almost bound to be stuff like TFL board papers online, that include frequency diagrams that were drawn up before the Olympia trains were pulled.
 

LU_timetabler

Member
Joined
5 Feb 2017
Messages
165
Yes, I was fairly sure the decision post dates a lot of the online information that’s knocking around. There’s almost bound to be stuff like TFL board papers online, that include frequency diagrams that were drawn up before the Olympia trains were pulled.
Also Olympia runs on weekends still.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Are there enough S7 units to saturate the Circle & District via Victoria headways with full end-to-end diagrams?

If not, we could very well see an Olympia service in the future, as a method to "terminate at Earl's Court" from the East (and thus maximise core frequency), without tying up the heavily-used platforms there with turnarounds.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
Are there enough S7 units to saturate the Circle & District via Victoria headways with full end-to-end diagrams?
Yes there ought to be, because there are intended to be no short workings at all in the peaks, eg at Tower Hill. Westbound from Earls Court there are 16 tph to Wimbledon, and 8 tph to Richmond and Ealing Broadway shown, ie the full intended frequency.
 

rebmcr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
3,851
Location
St Neots
Yes there ought to be, because there are intended to be no short workings at all in the peaks, eg at Tower Hill. Westbound from Earls Court there are 16 tph to Wimbledon, and 8 tph to Richmond and Ealing Broadway shown, ie the full intended frequency.

Very well! The depots must be reveling in the magnitude of maintenance flexibility at the moment!
 

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,377
Location
JB/JP/JW
I think there’s still trains away getting ATO mods, but yes they shouldn’t be fully utilised yet.

All trains back from ATO mods but not all are yet commissioned for use. Fleet requirements are effectively higher whilst some units are VOBC signed off and some aren’t (as you need a buffer of both varieties). Some trains are also on different software versions and held back for testing.

No short trips planned to Tower Hill but trains will reverse at the east end at Barking. There aren’t enough trains to run a full Upminster service.

Sending trains to Olympia causes too many delays to through services on the west, there isn’t a plan for them to return post ATO, and as mentioned the weekend is nothing more than a footnote (and even then it tends to be 3tph, not 4tph).
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
All trains back from ATO mods but not all are yet commissioned for use. Fleet requirements are effectively higher whilst some units are VOBC signed off and some aren’t (as you need a buffer of both varieties). Some trains are also on different software versions and held back for testing.

No short trips planned to Tower Hill but trains will reverse at the east end at Barking. There aren’t enough trains to run a full Upminster service.

Sending trains to Olympia causes too many delays to through services on the west, there isn’t a plan for them to return post ATO, and as mentioned the weekend is nothing more than a footnote (and even then it tends to be 3tph, not 4tph).
Yes that’s true, I wasn’t really thinking of the furthest east end. That seems fairly settled in all the proposals with Barking and Upminster services increasing slightly compared to now, but not running the whole service through.
 

Peter Mugridge

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Apr 2010
Messages
14,825
Location
Epsom
Are there enough S7 units to saturate the Circle & District via Victoria headways with full end-to-end diagrams?

If not, we could very well see an Olympia service in the future, as a method to "terminate at Earl's Court" from the East (and thus maximise core frequency), without tying up the heavily-used platforms there with turnarounds.

Just a thought, but wouldn't that cause an issue at West Kensington East Junction? I seem to recall that the line towards Olympia crosses the eastbound track on the flat?
 
Last edited:

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,418
Just a though, but wouldn't that cause an issue at West Kensington East Junction? I seem to recall that the line towards Olympia crosses the eastbound track on the flat?
That was exactly the justification when they pulled the service. Which is why I was surprised to see it on a drawing in a current publication.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,202
Even worse when the service comes into Earl's Court platform 4, as it then blocks the westbound Wimbledon line too.
 

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,202
Back in C stock days I definitely caught a service to Olympia from 4, it must have come from Gloucester Road. Stood in the platform for quite some time.
 

Top