• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Commuter Wellbeing in Train Stations

Status
Not open for further replies.

markymark2000

On Moderation
Joined
11 May 2015
Messages
3,557
Location
Western Part of the UK
I once tried texting the number to report an aggressive beggar at New Street. Message wouldn't send. Claimed I needed to give permission for text messages that might charge money (isn't the number free?) but even when I gave the permission, nothing was forthcoming.
No, you need credit as texting BTP for some reason isn't allowed as part of normal network text allowances.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TRAX

Established Member
Joined
2 Dec 2015
Messages
1,647
Location
France
The biggest way to improve commuter wellbeing would be to scrap all the pointless, unnecessary "health&safetybollox" announcements (unattended luggage/wet weather/seeitsayitsortit/no rollerblading/etc). Perhaps play some nice peaceful birdsong over the speakers instead?
This.
 

6Gman

Established Member
Joined
1 May 2012
Messages
8,421
Not at all, merely suggesting that when the original poster wrote 'commuters' they probably really wanted to know about all station users.

Or maybe he did specifically mean commuters since they are subject to (near) daily experience of facilities?
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,246
Location
St Albans
Or maybe he did specifically mean commuters since they are subject to (near) daily experience of facilities?
Of course, commuters are to a degree captive travellers, so apart from their off-peak prices for Anytime travel, they don't have any other clout when complaining apart from lobbying politicians who see championing commuters as a good career move.
Fortunately, the railway values off-peak travel business and generally is prepared to invest to court the leisure traveller with selective improvements inculuding at key stations.
 

jon0844

Veteran Member
Joined
1 Feb 2009
Messages
28,050
Location
UK
I once tried texting the number to report an aggressive beggar at New Street. Message wouldn't send. Claimed I needed to give permission for text messages that might charge money (isn't the number free?) but even when I gave the permission, nothing was forthcoming.

No, it isn't free. Doesn't come out of your SMS allowance (or doesn't mine) so that's maybe why you get the warning as it's a shortcode. No idea why you didn't get a response. I find I usually do quite quick, although often BTP reply from another number (and start a new SMS thread).
 

3141

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
1,772
Location
Whitchurch, Hampshire
Not at all, merely suggesting that when the original poster wrote 'commuters' they probably really wanted to know about all station users.

I'm sure you're right about that, but it highlights why I said earlier that the project ought to be cancelled. They talk about "enlighten joy", which is meaningless, and they haven't bothered to find out enough about public transport to know that "passengers" and "commuters" aren't the same. It strongly suggests that the whole thing is half-baked.
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
5,835
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
I'm sure you're right about that, but it highlights why I said earlier that the project ought to be cancelled. They talk about "enlighten joy", which is meaningless, and they haven't bothered to find out enough about public transport to know that "passengers" and "commuters" aren't the same. It strongly suggests that the whole thing is half-baked.

Give the OP a chance.

Whether he means "commuters" or "passengers in general" is neither here or there; he probably just means "people who travel by train". Maybe some young, fresh ideas "could" be a good thing but don't slate the poor man down when he is simply asking a railway forum for ideas.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,783
Location
Herts
Just chip in and say "commuters" are incredibly resiliant and dare I say it "quite tolerant" - I have been one for a long time and had direct professional operational responsobilty for some challenging and busy lines in urban and main line situations.

You can never , ever provide enough information - critically at disruption times. Small things matter like staff attending to issues from minor on train cleaning matters , in sight of customers. As a manager I was never too proud to get stuck in and clean a train if it needed to , and keep it running. (and to thank those who did)
 

3141

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2012
Messages
1,772
Location
Whitchurch, Hampshire
Give the OP a chance.

Whether he means "commuters" or "passengers in general" is neither here or there; he probably just means "people who travel by train". Maybe some young, fresh ideas "could" be a good thing but don't slate the poor man down when he is simply asking a railway forum for ideas.

As information about this project has been placed here I'm entitled, on the evidence provided by the OP, to form and express a critical opinion about it.
 

Fawkes Cat

Established Member
Joined
8 May 2017
Messages
2,981
Thinking about barrier lines: the first priority must be that they are safe to use. Within that, it would be good if going through them was quick and easy. That probably raises questions about where you have to put your ticket to be recognised (and how many different ways there are of identifying a valid ticket) and how to have gates open for the maximum convenience of farepaying passengers while blocking those without valid tickets.

In terms of facilities while waiting for a train, it's a matter of what can be sensibly rolled out to all sources of traffic, while bearing cost and the risks of vandalism in mind. In passing, it only now occurs to me that bus stops are quite good at having shelters on the stop to go into town (where you may well be waiting for a while for your bus) but nothing bar a bus stop sign for the return stop (because you won't be waiting but going home instead) - yet (it seems to me) multi-platform railway stations tend to have the same facilities on arrival and departure platforms.
 
Joined
29 Sep 2010
Messages
174
Improving my own wellbeing...

- Being funnelled through a pinch point gateline adds time/aggro to the whole station experience, especially where there are conflicting pedestrian flows. I'm thinking of Shrewsbury, and the business of taking a bike through the one 2-way wide barrier. I try to be patient, the gateline staff are lovely, but it can still seem to take an inordinate amount of time to get through, especially in the evening rush-hour. Plus when WM Trains are running a mob-handed ticket swoop, it all seems a bit as if the Gestapo have arrived. Some passengers are absolute swines though, and the gateline staff do have the patience of saints.

- Other stations it's mostly measures to improve physical comfort, especially protection from the rain. I'm guessing a feeling of security (e.g. protection from muggers) would help too. Female colleagues at work have mentioned their unease about changing trains at Wolverhampton. The station is entirely open, and it can feel like a threatening place.
 

steph_park

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
6
Location
Glasgow
What does “enlighten joy” even mean? :rolleyes:
I'm glad you asked and I should've explained it in more detail in my initial post. Joy differs for everyone, but I believe you don't have to be 'happy' to experience joy. Joy is what you feel when you experience an intense moment of positivity due to a flurry of endorphins. Sometimes you might not even realise you're experiencing joy but it will increase your endorphins and this in turn will be better for your mental wellbeing, at least for a short while.
 

steph_park

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
6
Location
Glasgow
Interesting to read all these ideas for increasing the total of human happiness by spending money on exercise bikes for recharging phones, covered ways from the nearest bus stop to the platform, heated waiting rooms, dampness-triggered slip hazard signs (they should also be heat-triggered for when the tarmac starts to melt during a heatwave), and emojis everywhere, but they don't go far enough. We also need compensation if ever any of these great innovations isn't in full working order, and also for those people who are quite happy with the voices currently used for announcements and won't like their replacements.

I've got two suggestions. The first one is that there's no need for new jingles, because all we need to make people feel more joyful is for "See it, say it, sorted" to be set to music. There would be a great many versions, in different musical styles, and ranging from solos to 4000-person choruses. Commuters would listen out for what was coming up next, in order to add a new version to their collection. There'd also be a counselling scheme for those who deliberately missed their train in the hope that the next jingle up would be one they hadn't heard before; it would be funded by a levy on all TOCs.

My second suggestion is that this research project ought to be cancelled.
Ok thanks for your input. I'm not cancelling this project, I find it really interesting that theres endless possibilities to design stations to give people better travelling experiences and i'm gaining valuable insight from 'most' of this feed to help me.
 

steph_park

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
6
Location
Glasgow
Rather a strange permise for a thread;
"Commuter Wellbeing in Train Stations".
I know that some commuters think that the railway is only run for their convenience, but inconveniently for them, there are plenty of other passengers whose wellbeing is of equal importance, especially at the station specifically mentioned so far.
I agree, it's definitely a project for everyone however when you look at the demographics, it is mostly commuters who have worse mental health/wellbeing, due to how busy it is at those times of the day and how stressed people are trying to get to work on time/ or get home quickly.
 

steph_park

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
6
Location
Glasgow
Or maybe Steph_park's a she ;)
she is indeed
Give the OP a chance.

Whether he means "commuters" or "passengers in general" is neither here or there; he probably just means "people who travel by train". Maybe some young, fresh ideas "could" be a good thing but don't slate the poor man down when he is simply asking a railway forum for ideas.
Thank you!!!
 

steph_park

Member
Joined
31 Oct 2019
Messages
6
Location
Glasgow
I'm sure you're right about that, but it highlights why I said earlier that the project ought to be cancelled. They talk about "enlighten joy", which is meaningless, and they haven't bothered to find out enough about public transport to know that "passengers" and "commuters" aren't the same. It strongly suggests that the whole thing is half-baked.
I asked a few questions which you didn't have to reply to if you didn't want to but you did - if you are not going to provide any constructive discussion please don't participate. As I replied previously with, in general, commuters tend to have worse mental states/ wellbeing in train stations due to the time of day and purpose of their travel - I used 'commuters' in the title because my project is mostly focused towards them. Although, it is not exclusive, and you're right I should have made that clear, apologises. This project is in it's primary stages and i'm simply using this platform for some initial ideas and research - to all those who understand this and see potential for it, I thank you for your help.
 

AM9

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
14,246
Location
St Albans
... in general, commuters tend to have worse mental states/ wellbeing in train stations due to the time of day and purpose of their travel - ...
I (and others here) don't concur with your opinion about commuters' mental states, specifically because (in my opinion) they are more likely to be prepared for the journey that they take every working day. Therefore, inadequacies in the station come as no surprise to them and they can take steps to minimise the impact of them on their journeys.
Casual/leisure travellers however are usually arriving at stations outside the peaks and the service is unlikely to offer a turn-up and go convenience. Consequently, disruption of a more sparse service is probably going extend their waiting times considerably. Thus their time at the station may involve far more time standing around, maybe they have children and/or luggage with them and they might be elderly so less physically robust than prime-of-life adults in full time employment. That is my non commuter-centric view, - as the same stations are there to provide for all users, maybe your project should consider the provision of commuter-friendly benefits alongside those of other passengers.
 
Last edited:

fizzwheel

Member
Joined
14 Oct 2015
Messages
37
Here is my 2p. I currently commute 3 days a week between Castle Cary and Reading

For my Journey into work - basically I want to get to the station, park my car, get on the train with as little noise, disturbance, hassle as possible.

1. I'd agree with other comments, I dont want to be listening to "see it, say it, sorted" at 06:35 in the morning, reduce the amount of announcements or reduce the volume of them.
2. Improve the flow through the gateline or at least encourage people to find their ticket and have it ready prior to getting to the gateline and then stopping to fish it out of their pocket etc

For my Journey home

I want to get off the train and get into my car and out of the station carpark as quickly and as easily as possible

1. Improve the flow of people off the station, i.e. some way of educating people so that if they are meeting people off the train dont wait for them at the bottom of the footbridge steps, creating a pinch point and causing people to have to queue or walk around them

2. Encourage people who are waiting to meet people off the train to use the station carpark spaces, rather than just abandoning their car as close to the platform as possible and then blocking the car park up, or even blocking me in so I cant get my car out to go home.

The problem is fixing most of those things involves education and some realisation for how we behave as individuals and how our actions impact on other people and its my sad impression that we live in a society where most people simply dont consider other people anymore so there isnt much that can be done, when you add into that I also feel that I live in a world where everybody is stressed, busy feels under pressure all the time I'm not surprised nobody really thinks about what they do and how it impacts other people and there is nothing in my opinion that the "railways" can do about that.

I've tried to deal with it all by controlling what I do and how i feel about it.

1. Noise cancelling headphones
2. Leaving myself time and not being in a rush so that if I do get blocked in or somebody causes a queue I just take a deep breathe and count to 10 and try and let it brush over me

Therefore, maybe the way to improve a commuters well being is to either

1. Teach mindfulness or coping techniques so that when you get blocked in or somebody pushes in front of you or you walk into somebody at the gateline who just suddenly stops and looks for their ticket it doesnt annoy or irritate you.
2. Encourage employeers to embrace flexible working methods, such as working at home or flexible hours so we arent all craming ourselves onto the same trains at the same time because we are forced to go physically into the workplace or work 9 to 5 hours ( I do realise that some jobs this cant be avoided )
 

urbophile

Established Member
Joined
26 Nov 2015
Messages
2,073
Location
Liverpool
I think there are too many, and pointless announcements over the PA which is annoying and tiresome. They increase noise pollution and stress. People habituate to all of these announcements and eventually stop listening.

with the unwelcome result that people talk over even the ones that are important.
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
5,835
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
@steph_park

Perhaps I could propose a few questions?

Is your product a "hard, tangible" product or is it an app?
To whom, specifically are you designing for?
Have you identified a specific need/market - and if so, how?
What specifically, do you want to achieve?
What age group is your idea aimed at, e.g. young adult, middle age?
Does it matter if your proposed cohort isn't tech savvy?
What other research have you done in relation to your idea
Have you conceptualised your product?
Are there competitors/similar products?
If your product gets off the ground, how will you test it?
Will a trial require approval through the Ethics Committee/other relevant committee?
How will you identify risks in relation to your idea/product?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top