• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

First Trenitalia (Avanti!) WCML branding, naming and livery

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,652
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Yuck! :lol:
I'd avoid all mention of coast, as the route only lives up to the name for a few hundred yards at Hest Bank.

And along much of the North Wales coast from Flint to Holyhead - that's on the ICWC route too.
You get a glimpse of the sea approaching Blackpool North also.
Somewhere south of Lockerbie you can see the Solway Firth with the Lakeland fells beyond.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
And along much of the North Wales coast from Flint to Holyhead - that's on the ICWC route too.
You get a glimpse of the sea approaching Blackpool North also.
Somewhere south of Lockerbie you can see the Solway Firth with the Lakeland fells beyond.
The North Wales coast, as the name suggests, points North... then again the existence of Wales means England doesn't have much of a West coast, but even if Wales wasn't there the WCML would be a long way from its eponymous coast for the first 1/3 of its length.

I'd go for a name like LMLSR (London, Midland, Lancashire and Scottish Railway)... that should put a cat amongst the pigeons! <D
 

thealm

Member
Joined
4 Jun 2019
Messages
114
Location
London Kings Cross
When you start putting ands into a train company name you know that this heritage this heritage thing has gone to far. I would be perfectly fine with Avanti.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
If you want to be pedantic, it’s also fairly close to the coast at Blackpool too. I’m sure they will come up with something which won’t outrage the interested parties who are involved, regardless of whether it’s served by one a day, one an hour or three an hour. We’re supposed to be here to serve the public, not just those who turn up in large numbers. That’s our raisin d’etre.
 

MarkWiles

Member
Joined
21 Jul 2019
Messages
66
Whilst there has been a trend towards "retro" names, like Southern, GWR, LNWR and LNER, there has also been a trend towards non-historic but more geographical naming, such as Northern, and EMR. Then there's the meaningless Greater Anglia which whilst technically correct in that it is bigger than (East) Anglia including some counties which don't normally get described as East Anglia, is frankly a dead haddock when it comes to resonance with the public, although probably a bit better than "One" ever could be.

So, I suspect it could go any way, but not necessarily a shoo-in for LMS. Personally I'd prefer a name without "London" in it and I suspect there could be a few supporters of greater devolution for the Midlands and North who would prefer something less London-centric as well.
 

cactustwirly

Established Member
Joined
10 Apr 2013
Messages
7,453
Location
UK
I'd love a less London-centric service, but the important part there is service. The name is, really, neither here nor there.

What! The whole point of the franchise is to link London with the West Mids and North West
 
Joined
1 Nov 2019
Messages
42
Hi everyone, hope you're all doing well! Long time lurker itching to post. I'm hoping hoping it's going to be LMS as a nod to the past but building on the future. I live in Lancashire near Preston so the name doesn't really capture my location but I've always felt it was London as the hub (most originating or terminating services) with Midlands being the midlands of the UK (not the black country) but the notional central part of the WCML - Leyland/Preston, then on to Scotland.

I do think some people forget London is in the South-East, so by calling it West Coast by the route it takes doesn't really take into account the biggest and most popular destination on the line.

On the contrary (and I argue with myself here) - another name I'd support would be West Railway or Western Railway (or Western Trains). It's simple and describes clearly the route. Although, like I said London is in the South East, but it captures the majority of the route.

I think we're going to end up with something a little more polished and branded though, so my expectation goes to Avanti Trains if we're expecting one or the other. Of the two, I'd hope for LMS, purely for the historic reasons and I like it - that's my personal choice. But we have to move forward, so I wish the new franchise well under whatever name it's going to be, and I hope it thrives. I'll be sad to see Virgin go, as it's been a big name in the rail industry since I became interested as a kid. But things move on and even faster on the railways! I didn't understand Franchising as a kid when I first went spotting, so I've just appreciated what we had. Virgin has always been a big name to me, and now I know things must change, I'm looking back fondly.
 
Last edited:

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
What! The whole point of the franchise is to link London with the West Mids and North West
No, it's not. The franchise is also the only provider of train services on some routes, including literally any journey that involves Preston/Wigan (or north of) to Warrington/Crewe (or south of). Fast services to and from London are great, if that's where you want to go, but the West Coast franchise is about much, much more than only trains to and from London.
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
No, it's not. The franchise is also the only provider of train services on some routes, including literally any journey that involves Preston/Wigan (or north of) to Warrington/Crewe (or south of). Fast services to and from London are great, if that's where you want to go, but the West Coast franchise is about much, much more than only trains to and from London.
Hmm, I don't know what percentage of journeys on ICWC start or finish in London, but LNER say that 60% of journeys on ICEC start or finish in London.

Yes, I know the ICWC franchise includes West Midlands-Scotland services which don't really have an equivalent on ICEC. But I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of journeys on ICWC are to/from London.
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
Hmm, I don't know what percentage of journeys on ICWC start or finish in London, but LNER say that 60% of journeys on ICEC start or finish in London.

Yes, I know the ICWC franchise includes West Midlands-Scotland services which don't really have an equivalent on ICEC. But I wouldn't be surprised if the majority of journeys on ICWC are to/from London.

depends in the route. I wouldn’t necessarily agree on Brum-Londons for the local commuters to International and especially Cov. You also get a lot at Wigan heading north as it’s still the main interchange point from Liverpool heading north for now, and Preston heading North too. A lot also get out at Chester on North Wales originating services.
 

Chiltern006

Member
Joined
3 Oct 2018
Messages
656
I've heard Avanti will be the brand name, something like AvantiRail or Avanti Trains
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
I just hope that "Avanti" is not the TOC's name going forward.

Avanti should be to West Coast as Azuma is to East Coast, and that's it!
The Azuma name on LNER has led people to think that that's the name of the company. The average person doesn't need or want to know what sort of train they're on, and won't know that's what that word means anyway. It just confuses people and leads to "branding fatigue".
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,136
Location
Dunblane
The Azuma name on LNER has led people to think that that's the name of the company. The average person doesn't need or want to know what sort of train they're on, and won't know that's what that word means anyway. It just confuses people and leads to "branding fatigue".
indeed, Given that their entire fleet is going to be 80x anyway, I fail to see a point in having a brand name for a new product that isn't very revolutionary. With pendos and VT it worked as it was a huge upgrade as these were the first real new trains in decades and decades.
I can't see FT or indeed LNER having a similar success with these names going forwards.
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,759
indeed, Given that their entire fleet is going to be 80x anyway, I fail to see a point in having a brand name for a new product that isn't very revolutionary. With pendos and VT it worked as it was a huge upgrade as these were the first real new trains in decades and decades.
I can't see FT or indeed LNER having a similar success with these names going forwards.
Plus virigin have more than 1 type of train so having names for them makes sense
 

RealTrains07

Established Member
Joined
28 Feb 2019
Messages
1,759
I was wrong, virgin branding is all gone at stoke. Even the displays have had the logo removed
 

Attachments

  • 4F7597AA-F3A0-4C78-8976-B2A165CBB94E.jpeg
    4F7597AA-F3A0-4C78-8976-B2A165CBB94E.jpeg
    1.7 MB · Views: 236

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,459
LMS Mancunian Pendolino Service
LMS Scottish Pendolino Service
LMS Merseyside Pendolino Service
LMS Merseyside Avanti Service
LMS Midlands Pendolino Service
LMS Fylde Avanti Service
LMS North Wales Avanti Duello Service
LMS Salop Avanti Duello Service
Bit long and confusing, most people only want where the train stops and the company, maybe through in a brand name like Pendolino but not much more.

EMR, while I admire the colour scheme, I feel is trying to be something it's not.
EMR shows you can't just stick railway on the end and have an older style logo to make people like the brand more, people have heard of GWR, nobody has heard of EMR before because it never existed.
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,441
Location
Farnham
I have been told by the fifth guard this week that it’s Avanti Trains btw... all the staff hate it.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,657
Location
Another planet...
Plus virigin have more than 1 type of train so having names for them makes sense
Why does it?

My parents (boomers and occasional rail users) were coming back from London yesterday, and they were confused by the announcements for "LNER Azuma" services. Northern don't advertise the "1212 Northern Pacer service to Sheffield", and people generally don't care much what the train is called. They need to know if they're boarding the right train, and if it has a multitude of names announced it causes people to worry they're on the wrong train.

Keep it simple, ffs!
 

zn1

Member
Joined
3 Sep 2011
Messages
435
why not just call the company taking over from virgin west coast -" this train goes to ltd . " and lob the fleet in black and maroon ...
 

tasky

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2018
Messages
381
Why does it?

My parents (boomers and occasional rail users) were coming back from London yesterday, and they were confused by the announcements for "LNER Azuma" services. Northern don't advertise the "1212 Northern Pacer service to Sheffield", and people generally don't care much what the train is called. They need to know if they're boarding the right train, and if it has a multitude of names announced it causes people to worry they're on the wrong train.

Keep it simple, ffs!

Agree with this – anyone looking at the Class 80x livery on LNER would be forgiven for thinking they were getting a train with a company called "Azuma".

Either don't have a name, or have consistent train categories like IC, RE, L etc in continental Europe
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top