• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Northern Class 195: Construction/Introduction Updates

Status
Not open for further replies.

ic31420

Member
Joined
23 Aug 2017
Messages
314
As a cyclist who does travel by train (not as much as I'd like because I can't take the bike on metrolink) I think perhaps a fiver flat rate would be sensible.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
I'm not sure this is the thread for discussing whether bicycles should be carried or not. But in the context of the Class 195s where they are carried, it makes no sense to have the area where they are meant to go designed as a convenient seating area that people quite like, as that basically renders it useless and the bikes end up in the vestibule instead. Similarly, having the tip-ups in the standbacks doesn't make sense, as they then can't be used for luggage or standing passengers.
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,011
Well, js1000 certainly wasn't suggesting that the railway would run better but for passengers, quite the contrary, he was suggesting that they don't get sufficient priority. I'm all in favour of people being able to take their bikes by train, but do find something a little incongruous about carrying that bike for free, when it takes up the space of at least one passenger, and probably more.
Correct Boverboy. The amount of times during the morning peak someone with a bike barges their way onto a rammed train with no consideration for other passengers. I just find it inconsiderate when considering the bike takes up space for another passenger or two. If bikes weren't banned during peak I wouldn't have a problem as much.

In better news the spaciousness of the 195 allowed a lot of passengers to cram on a what should have been a 6 coach this morning (only 2 coaches). I was mildly impressed - a Pacer, 150, 156 would not have been able to accommodate as many standing passengers.
 

Bovverboy

Established Member
Joined
1 Dec 2013
Messages
1,933
In better news the spaciousness of the 195 allowed a lot of passengers to cram on a what should have been a 6 coach this morning (only 2 coaches). I was mildly impressed - a Pacer, 150, 156 would not have been able to accommodate as many standing passengers.

Quite, but a 150 or 156 would have accommodated more passengers seated (c.150 compared to 124 in a 195/0), so I doubt that many more passengers in total would have been able to board the 195. I suspect, in fact, that the 150 may have actually won the contest.
 

northernchris

Established Member
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
1,509
Quite, but a 150 or 156 would have accommodated more passengers seated (c.150 compared to 124 in a 195/0), so I doubt that many more passengers in total would have been able to board the 195. I suspect, in fact, that the 150 may have actually won the contest.

I thought seating capacity of a 2 car 195 was like for like with a PRM'd 150
 

Furton

Member
Joined
18 Sep 2018
Messages
23
Correct Boverboy. The amount of times during the morning peak someone with a bike barges their way onto a rammed train with no consideration for other passengers. I just find it inconsiderate when considering the bike takes up space for another passenger or two. If bikes weren't banned during peak I wouldn't have a problem as much.

In better news the spaciousness of the 195 allowed a lot of passengers to cram on a what should have been a 6 coach this morning (only 2 coaches). I was mildly impressed - a Pacer, 150, 156 would not have been able to accommodate as many standing passengers.

Was that this afternoon's service from Manchester to Liverpool? It's a disgrace when this happens!
 

Kieran1990

Member
Joined
29 Feb 2016
Messages
407
Location
Leeds
Had two trips yesterday on the Class 195’s from Leeds to Bradford and return. I really can’t make my mind up if I like them or not.
- Ride quality was not great, the constant banging from the boogies was unsettling.
-positive thought- seat was comfy, acceleration is really good, PIS worked perfectly and they are light and airy.

I was on the 16:18 out of Leeds and everyone bar 2 people had a seat in the leading coach
 

ashkeba

Established Member
Joined
13 May 2019
Messages
2,171
In this case the large panniers had been removed before Totley Tunnel. I don't know where they left the train but suspect it took a minute or two more than booked.
So, to sum up, you've no idea but feel free to make things up about people doing their best to travel more healthily. Most cyclists I've seen are quite slick at getting themselves and luggage off trains. It's getting on that is slower, especially when people sit in the bike bay. I would leave tip up seats installed but lock them out of use on off peak trains. The basic problem is running trains too small, not that three bikes take up space of three standees.

The one blocking the cab door should have been moved or ejected, though I don't know what other work the guard had.

Would people also like to make stuff up blaming PRMs for any extended dwells? Or only PRMS who use cycles as "rolling walking sticks"?
 

Killingworth

Established Member
Joined
30 May 2018
Messages
4,868
Location
Sheffield
So, to sum up, you've no idea but feel free to make things up about people doing their best to travel more healthily. Most cyclists I've seen are quite slick at getting themselves and luggage off trains. It's getting on that is slower, especially when people sit in the bike bay. I would leave tip up seats installed but lock them out of use on off peak trains. The basic problem is running trains too small, not that three bikes take up space of three standees.

The one blocking the cab door should have been moved or ejected, though I don't know what other work the guard had.

Would people also like to make stuff up blaming PRMs for any extended dwells? Or only PRMS who use cycles as "rolling walking sticks"?

Bikes on trains are a digession from this thread, but the point here was that on already overcrowded trains, where passengers are sometimes turned away with or without bikes, more carriages are needed of any type, as you've effectively said. In this case the doorways and gangways were already fairly tightly packed when the couple arrived fairly close to departure. The guard was having difficulty getting all the standees aboard and the single cyclist had been an early boarder. He did well not to leave anyone behind as far as I could tell. Having a small dedicated cycle space with tip up seats is liable to provoke strife in times of heavy congestion. (When I travelled on a 195 last month there was no clear outside indication of where cycles should be placed.)

It's not cyclists, hikers (also with big rucksacks) or those bound to Manchester Airport (with large cases) fault that Northern can't put on enough carriages on a Saturday morning. I'd still contend that passengers travelling with large items of any sort may need to pay extra for the space, but that's a challenging issue for another thread now we've all got used to not paying.
 

Llama

Established Member
Joined
29 Apr 2014
Messages
1,955
0617 ex Chester (to Leeds) should be a three car 158 tomorrow.
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,365
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
It's not cyclists, hikers (also with big rucksacks) or those bound to Manchester Airport (with large cases) fault that Northern can't put on enough carriages on a Saturday morning. I'd still contend that passengers travelling with large items of any sort may need to pay extra for the space, but that's a challenging issue for another thread now we've all got used to not paying.

I would like to draw a comparison to a specific area of buses here, in the referred-to area of the train, are there any signs affixed to the carriage that gives advice, as on buses that I have travelled on, there is an affixed sign in the wheelchair area that is clear in its wording, usually where child buggies occupy that specific space.
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,583
affixed sign in the wheelchair area that is clear in its wording
But a recentish court case seems to have left all of this in a legal no-man's land. This issue remains, as before, the absolute lack of capacity argue it as we will.
I strongly suspect all of the north of England's new rolling stock will rapidly fill up as overcrowding is supressing ridership. Off topic for this thread esp. TPE but also around Leeds and Manchester on Northern. If we are moving towards carbon neutrality rail is ill prepared for the numbers it will produce.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,686
Location
west yorkshire
I hear the 195s may be having difficulty with applying traction on greasy rails. If this is a real problem or just drivers interpreting gearchanges as wheel slip and reducing power I know not. I dont even know if they have any form of traction control.
I seem to remember reading somewhere that some trains (was it the original pacers or the 172s) automatically change up a gear if wheelslip is detected. Anyone any thoughts?
K
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
Whilst I personally like the 195s, there are times when I do wonder what's going on. This is what's displaying on 195123 on the 1424 Wigan - Manchester this afternoon. It's also being announced, "This is the Northern service to... The next stop is...," on the PA... :rolleyes:
20191106_142805.jpg

(Image shows a Passenger Information Screen on unit 195123. The screen is displaying "This is the Northern service to... We will be calling at... " with the word ".... and" scrolling across the bottom.)
 

Neptune

Established Member
Joined
29 May 2018
Messages
2,478
Location
Yorkshire
I worked 195123 on the Calder valley last week with the same problem. The ASDO still works ok on it though.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
I worked 195123 on the Calder valley last week with the same problem. The ASDO still works ok on it though.
They crew have turned it off altogether now, which is probably for the best. Manual announcements instead.
 

SteveM70

Established Member
Joined
11 Jul 2018
Messages
3,855
One thing I do like about the 195s compared to 156/158s is the double width doors and the doors being 1/3 and 2/3 along the carriage. So much quicker getting a trainload off at Victoria in the mornings
 

baldyman26

Member
Joined
2 Aug 2012
Messages
74
Spent a couple of days commuting to Manchester from Liverpool South parkway, yesterday a 2 coach 195 showed up, I think it got to the point where standing room only was an understatement, it was heaving, the guard sounded as though he had had enough to th point where he was asking people to get off for safety reasons... First time on the 195, why given how busy this route is that no overhead grab straps or handles for standing passengers is beyond me... These trains are not smooth, the vibrations are ridiculous, the brakes are too sharp and if I'm honest, the 150/156/158 give a better ride.... Today was better, a 4 coach train this morning however, sitting down I was still shocked by the vibrations from the wheels... No matter what money is spent on new trains, we are simply polishing over the cracks of a rail network not up to standard
 

js1000

Member
Joined
14 Jun 2014
Messages
1,011
Spent a couple of days commuting to Manchester from Liverpool South parkway, yesterday a 2 coach 195 showed up, I think it got to the point where standing room only was an understatement, it was heaving, the guard sounded as though he had had enough to th point where he was asking people to get off for safety reasons... First time on the 195, why given how busy this route is that no overhead grab straps or handles for standing passengers is beyond me... These trains are not smooth, the vibrations are ridiculous, the brakes are too sharp and if I'm honest, the 150/156/158 give a better ride.... Today was better, a 4 coach train this morning however, sitting down I was still shocked by the vibrations from the wheels... No matter what money is spent on new trains, we are simply polishing over the cracks of a rail network not up to standard
Unfortunately there have been multiple instances of 2 coach operation on the Liverpool to Manchester Airport route this week. This is supposed to be 6 coaches at peak time.
 

themiller

Member
Joined
4 Dec 2011
Messages
1,062
Location
Cumbria, UK
Whilst I personally like the 195s, there are times when I do wonder what's going on. This is what's displaying on 195123 on the 1424 Wigan - Manchester this afternoon. It's also being announced, "This is the Northern service to... The next stop is...," on the PA... :rolleyes:
View attachment 70184

(Image shows a Passenger Information Screen on unit 195123. The screen is displaying "This is the Northern service to... We will be calling at... " with the word ".... and" scrolling across the bottom.)

They crew have turned it off altogether now, which is probably for the best. Manual announcements instead.
I've just been on 195123 from Lancaster to Barrow in Furness and the system is as Matthew S described!
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
I've just been on 195123 from Lancaster to Barrow in Furness and the system is as Matthew S described!
Yeah. Believe it or not I had it on my return journey last night as well (the 2226 from Man Picc to Wigan).
 

Matt_pool

Member
Joined
9 Nov 2016
Messages
371
Wednesday just gone I got a shock when I went to Lime Street for the 21.55 to Oxford Road.

195 002 was on it instead of the usual 142/150/156. That was definitely a one off!

Monday just gone the 18.16 Lime Street to Man Airport was 195 001. Two carriages on a peak time train to the airport. Tut tut!

These services are supposed to be operated by 195/1's, which even with 3 carriages isn't enough, as I found out last month when a got on a Man Airport bound 195/1 at South Parkway which was already standing room only!
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,686
Location
west yorkshire
Wednesday just gone I got a shock when I went to Lime Street for the 21.55 to Oxford Road.

195 002 was on it instead of the usual 142/150/156. That was definitely a one off!

Monday just gone the 18.16 Lime Street to Man Airport was 195 001. Two carriages on a peak time train to the airport. Tut tut!

These services are supposed to be operated by 195/1's, which even with 3 carriages isn't enough, as I found out last month when a got on a Man Airport bound 195/1 at South Parkway which was already standing room only!
I cant understand why Northern are apparently short of 195s (also 331s) when edge hill looks full of them
K
 

507021

Established Member
Joined
19 Feb 2015
Messages
4,679
Location
Chester
I cant understand why Northern are apparently short of 195s (also 331s) when edge hill looks full of them
K

I understand the 195s/331s at Edge Hill are still being tested and aren't available for service yet.
 

Geeves

Established Member
Joined
6 Jan 2009
Messages
1,930
Location
Rochdale
Also in regards to the ones on the depot, they are waiting for various software mods and other things so cannot run in service yet. Obviously the priority for CAF are the units already handed over for general usage.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top