• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

December 2019 Timetable Change

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
It’s purely operational - 8 car Thameslink 700s fit into the south end bays at Cambridge the new GA units don’t do so have to run through to Cambridge North

Yes, correct.

Though I reckon than doing one service half-hourly from North rather than two individual hourly services might be better at stimulating more "turn up and go" type demand overall, particularly with cheaper GA fares to Liverpool Street (presently only the slow GA service reaching North, so not that attractive at the moment).
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

ivorytoast28

Member
Joined
10 Dec 2018
Messages
176
Location
Sheffield
So according to the national rail website, the southbound evening Chathill-Carlisle service will no longer stop at Newcastle. Presumably a mistake, as it would render the whole service pointless to have it pass straight through the main station everyone is using it for
grGXfjM

https://imgur.com/a/grGXfjM
 

800002

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2019
Messages
689
So according to the national rail website, the southbound evening Chathill-Carlisle service will no longer stop at Newcastle. Presumably a mistake, as it would render the whole service pointless to have it pass straight through the main station everyone is using it for
grGXfjM

https://imgur.com/a/grGXfjM
I would suggest a data error.
It is showing as stopping Newcastle to attach vehicles, 2013-2023. But it does not show the passenger stop marker.

http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/17157750/16/12/19
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Yes, correct.

Though I reckon than doing one service half-hourly from North rather than two individual hourly services might be better at stimulating more "turn up and go" type demand overall, particularly with cheaper GA fares to Liverpool Street (presently only the slow GA service reaching North, so not that attractive at the moment).

One oddity that remains at Cambridge is that the would-be 0824 to Brighton remains starting from Royston. Reason apprears to be the would-be 0827 departing earlier at 0825 and running early through to Welwyn Garden City, to get across Welwyn viaduct in front of the off-pattern 0540 Edinburgh-Kings Cross (Flying Scotsman/Flying Adonis)


The 0825 is proceeded by
0821 Liverpool St slow
0818 Liverpool Street peak fast

So the 0824 is tricky to move earlier, and would be left with a shorter turnround as a result.
 
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
443
Location
Wigan
I would suggest a data error.
It is showing as stopping Newcastle to attach vehicles, 2013-2023. But it does not show the passenger stop marker.

http://charlwoodhouse.co.uk/rail/liverail/train/17157750/16/12/19
I've noticed on a number of occasions that Northern have released timetable data with station calls in the Working Timetable, but not in the Passenger timetable. The most noticeable ones I came across were on the Whitby line a few weeks ago, where several trains were shown as running non-stop from Middlesbrough to Whitby in the passenger timetable, but stopped at all stations in the working timetable. These have been slowly rectified, but the Chathill - Newcastle train could still be one.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,217
Location
West of Andover
I've noticed on a number of occasions that Northern have released timetable data with station calls in the Working Timetable, but not in the Passenger timetable. The most noticeable ones I came across were on the Whitby line a few weeks ago, where several trains were shown as running non-stop from Middlesbrough to Whitby in the passenger timetable, but stopped at all stations in the working timetable. These have been slowly rectified, but the Chathill - Newcastle train could still be one.

I can remember one which was a Darlington - Whitby service which had the call at Middlesbrough showing as a non public call!
 

Class 170101

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2014
Messages
7,932
One oddity that remains at Cambridge is that the would-be 0824 to Brighton remains starting from Royston. Reason apprears to be the would-be 0827 departing earlier at 0825 and running early through to Welwyn Garden City, to get across Welwyn viaduct in front of the off-pattern 0540 Edinburgh-Kings Cross (Flying Scotsman/Flying Adonis)


The 0825 is proceeded by
0821 Liverpool St slow
0818 Liverpool Street peak fast

So the 0824 is tricky to move earlier, and would be left with a shorter turnround as a result.

Not sure there is a unit at Cambridge to form it. The Royston starter comes from Brighton 08:24 and departs 08:38.

However if there was a unit it would have to leave by 08:15 (a three minute turnaround from Brighton!!!!) But there is no route across at Shepreth Branch Jn. Leaving any earlier misses a potential previous arrival to form it.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Not sure there is a unit at Cambridge to form it. The Royston starter comes from Brighton 08:24 and departs 08:38.

However if there was a unit it would have to leave by 08:15 (a three minute turnaround from Brighton!!!!) But there is no route across at Shepreth Branch Jn. Leaving any earlier misses a potential previous arrival to form it.

The c.0810 arrival at Cambridge (that would be the 0824) shunts to the sidungs to come back as the 0854 (which the 0824 terminator at Royston would otherwise continue to form)
 

jhy44

Member
Joined
7 Aug 2008
Messages
184
Location
Bromsgrove (Worcestershire)
(Tried searching forums, can't find a WMR timetable thread).

Does anyone have a helpful summary of what the changes are going to be? Are some of the Rugeley/Walsall-Eustons being split at Birmingham now?
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
New hourly service between Halifax and Hull via Bradford, Leeds and Selby, extending the Leeds – Selby stopping service. The Huddersfield – Leeds via Halifax and Bradford hourly service will operate between Huddersfield and Bradford Interchange only. With other timing changes, there will be a 15 minute interval service from Leeds to Bradford and Halifax

This is at least one bit of good news from Northern (thank @Starmill ) - previously the service from Leeds/ Bradford to Halifax has been one of those lines where Northern run many services per hour but with awkward gaps between them - so its good to be moving to a much simpler timetable (rather than nothing for half an hour, then the first train that turns up running late because it has a disproportionately large flow of passengers).
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,371

iphone76

Member
Joined
6 Nov 2010
Messages
917
Location
South Essex
I notice that GA will stop at Prittlewell on a Sunday from the 15th December 19. I thought there was some sort of historic reason it wasn't allowed to open so interesting this seems to have changed.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,234
It seems a regular feature, Northern not proof reading their timetable update text. If I remember correctly, they issued a press release about a Southport to Manchester via Wigan North Western service in May, too...
As a result of the changes to Northern services to/from Southport, trains from Leeds/Blackburn via Calder Valley now run to/from Wigan only. Most terminate at Wallgate, with a few at apparently random times going to NW. Why is this - it will only cause confusion, passengers going to the wrong station etc. Surely it would be better to run them all to NW, where there are spare platforms and better onward connections, whereas terminating at Wallgate requires a shunt move.
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,090
As a result of the changes to Northern services to/from Southport, trains from Leeds/Blackburn via Calder Valley now run to/from Wigan only. Most terminate at Wallgate, with a few at apparently random times going to NW. Why is this - it will only cause confusion, passengers going to the wrong station etc. Surely it would be better to run them all to NW, where there are spare platforms and better onward connections, whereas terminating at Wallgate requires a shunt move.
They have to run some trains to North Western as 153s are now running on some Leeds services from today and are banned from Wallgate and also for stabling purposes. Network Rail wanted Northern to use the bays but they are not long enough for some 4 car formations so platform 1 became the default platform, which Network Rail would rather keep clear. Northern prefer to use Wallgate where possible as access charges are lower, they don't have to pay Avanti for dispatchers, they have train crew based there and barriers are in place for revenue protection.

The railway is generally run for operational convenience rather than to avoid confusing passengers or giving them better connections.
 
Last edited:

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,234
They have to run some trains to North Western as 153s are now running on some Leeds services from today and are banned from Wallgate and also for stabling purposes. Network Rail wanted Northern to use the bays but they are not long enough for some 4 car formations so platform 1 became the default platform, which Network Rail would rather keep clear. Northern prefer to use Wallgate where possible as access charges are lower, they don't have to pay Avanti for dispatchers, they have train crew based there and barriers are in place for revenue protection.

The railway is generally run for operational convenience rather than to avoid confusing passengers or giving them better connections.
Thanks. I assumed it was because of freight paths and/or route knowledge retention. Avanti dispatchers are still needed for other Northern services. If they are not dispatching trains towards Hindley, what else will they be doing?!
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,234
They have to run some trains to North Western as 153s are now running on some Leeds services from today and are banned from Wallgate and also for stabling purposes. Network Rail wanted Northern to use the bays but they are not long enough for some 4 car formations so platform 1 became the default platform, which Network Rail would rather keep clear. Northern prefer to use Wallgate where possible as access charges are lower, they don't have to pay Avanti for dispatchers, they have train crew based there and barriers are in place for revenue protection.

The railway is generally run for operational convenience rather than to avoid confusing passengers or giving them better connections.
Today two of the Calder Valley diagrams - a Leeds and a Blackburn to Wigan NW - did indeed have a 153 in the formation. Why exactly are they banned from Wallgate?
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
Today two of the Calder Valley diagrams - a Leeds and a Blackburn to Wigan NW - did indeed have a 153 in the formation. Why exactly are they banned from Wallgate?
They don't fit in the platforms. I believe it's the steps on the 153s that are the issue, but I'm sure someone will say if I'm wrong.
 

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,234
They don't fit in the platforms. I believe it's the steps on the 153s that are the issue, but I'm sure someone will say if I'm wrong.
Thanks. I was going to write that we never used have all these gauging problems in BR days, except the obvious ones like Tunbridge Wells - Hastings, but the 153s date from BR days.
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,090
Thanks. I assumed it was because of freight paths and/or route knowledge retention. Avanti dispatchers are still needed for other Northern services. If they are not dispatching trains towards Hindley, what else will they be doing?!
Thats not Northerns problem, they pay per train. The 2ph trains towards Hindley were timed at roughly the same as Virgins London ones resulting in either more dispatchers required as they can't be in 2 places at the same time or the Hindley trains departing a few minutes late waiting for a dispatcher.

Based on the current timetable there would be need for more dispatchers also as if the trains went from NW they would leave at roughly the same times as the Northern ones to Lime St (express) and Manchester Airport.
 

Mathew S

Established Member
Joined
7 Aug 2017
Messages
2,167
Thats not Northerns problem, they pay per train. The 2ph trains towards Hindley were timed at roughly the same as Virgins London ones resulting in either more dispatchers required as they can't be in 2 places at the same time or the Hindley trains departing a few minutes late waiting for a dispatcher.

Based on the current timetable there would be need for more dispatchers also as if the trains went from NW they would leave at roughly the same times as the Northern ones to Lime St (express) and Manchester Airport.
That's not strictly true. Only the xx08 clashed with a Virgin service. The xx50 clashed with Northerns own Lime street services at xx48 and xx51 (roughly).
 

Nev20

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2015
Messages
48
Apologies if this has already been covered. Back up North for uni today and I’ve noticed the 15:30 from New Street to Newcastle is now 15:28 As is the 09:28
10:28
But not the rest till going on 19:28. When did this change, and why only these 4?
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
Apologies if this has already been covered. Back up North for uni today and I’ve noticed the 15:30 from New Street to Newcastle is now 15:28 As is the 09:28
10:28
But not the rest till going on 19:28. When did this change, and why only these 4?

Those are the paths that run earlier and gain a significantly earlier path on the ECML at Donny, so are much quicker getting to Newcastle?

Presume others can't be made to work around freights paths etc.
 

IrishDave

Member
Joined
30 Jun 2009
Messages
379
Location
Brighton
Those are the paths that run earlier and gain a significantly earlier path on the ECML at Donny, so are much quicker getting to Newcastle?

Presume others can't be made to work around freights paths etc.
Yep, 2 minutes earlier out of New Street allows it to be 16 minutes earlier leaving Derby, which puts it in front of the "flight" at Doncaster rather than behind it, for a net gain of about 22 minutes. All thanks to the Derby remodelling for allowing faster entrances and exits to the platforms!
 

transmanche

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2011
Messages
6,018
Those are the paths that run earlier and gain a significantly earlier path on the ECML at Donny, so are much quicker getting to Newcastle?
The 10:28 departure leaves Derby at 11:00, gets to Doncaster at 11:53 and Newcastle at 13:16.
Whereas the 11:30 departure leaves Derby at 12:16 (after a 12 min wait), reaches Doncaster at 13:16 and Newcastle at 14:43.

So that 2 min earlier departure gives a 25 min shorter journey overall.
 

Nev20

Member
Joined
11 Oct 2015
Messages
48
I only use it as far as Sheffield but it’s an absolute god send. The 16 minute wait at Derby usually to then be let out behind EMR which is often late itself has always been a pain in the arse.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top