greatvoyager
Established Member
Thanks for confirming.No. It is using LNER power cars.
Thanks for confirming.No. It is using LNER power cars.
Cheaper to paint considering it's just for the 3 days, I would assume.
Just seemed a bit strange that going to the trouble of painting more than just power cars, they'd decide to paint only 7 trailers.
Also means a loss of capacity for the tours.
True, they'd be able to fill it if it was 2+9 easily!
That was why I suggested 43002 being used, as it's already in that livery.I'm sure posting this is equivalent to treason, but do we really need another HST painted in the original livery?? I get that it's iconic, but HSTs have had lots of liveries over the years which, dare I say, are more interesting. I'd honestly prefer seeing it in the intercity swallow livery, or perhaps the GNER livery, the only post privatisation livery that (I think) everyone seems to like.
Bear in mind this is coming from someone born in 2000 with no attachment whatsoever to the days of British Rail.
I'm sure posting this is equivalent to treason, but do we really need another HST painted in the original livery?? I get that it's iconic, but HSTs have had lots of liveries over the years which, dare I say, are more interesting. I'd honestly prefer seeing it in the intercity swallow livery, or perhaps the GNER livery, the only post privatisation livery that (I think) everyone seems to like.
Bear in mind this is coming from someone born in 2000 with no attachment whatsoever to the days of British Rail.
I think it's purely that it's the most iconic, the original and arguably the best remembered.
Also, privitisation-era liveries could be tricky depending who owns each of the brandings
I'd actually argue intercity swallow is more iconic. It was the livery they carried the longest, and the one that was worn when the speed record was achieved (I think anyway, I wasn't around back then so correct me if I'm wrong).
You can argue what you like, and you may well be right, but for a farewell tour it is fitting to paint trains in original livery.I'd actually argue intercity swallow is more iconic. It was the livery they carried the longest, and the one that was worn when the speed record was achieved (I think anyway, I wasn't around back then so correct me if I'm wrong).
I'd actually argue intercity swallow is more iconic. It was the livery they carried the longest, and the one that was worn when the speed record was achieved (I think anyway, I wasn't around back then so correct me if I'm wrong).
The speed record run featured a mixture of Intercity Swallow and BR Blue/Grey.
You can argue what you like, and you may well be right, but for a farewell tour it is fitting to paint trains in original livery.
I think that it's down to personal taste, but either way, the one that was originally applied brings the true nostalgia of the train.I'd actually argue intercity swallow is more iconic. It was the livery they carried the longest, and the one that was worn when the speed record was achieved (I think anyway, I wasn't around back then so correct me if I'm wrong).
Also, GWR named 43002 after Sir Kenneth Grange, who redesigned the front end to give it the familiar look.I guess. Either way, it's good to see LNER putting in the effort, unlike GWR who left their sets as they were, apart from the two powercars that had already been repainted.
No "Executive", based on the date I'd have thought at least some would've been in Exec still, Swallow being only 6 months in by then
Wonder if someone in the planning team could put 91119 next to the intercity 43 one at kings cross now that would be a sight
43102 was in Swallow, 43159 in Executive.
Does the formation (2+7) have anything to do with availability of coaches still on lease?
Slightly off topic, but could a higher speed be achieved with MTU or VP185 engined powercars? If so then GWRs Castle sets are running at about half their potential speed!
I know it's almost certain not to happen, but it's fun to speculate.
Same power rating of 2,250hp nominally. Both are capable of producing more power, but are both derated.
The limitation is the traction equipment - the traction motors etc.
The highest installed power used would be the 2,400hp of the Mirlees MB40 engines fitted to four WR power cars. They were said to give noticeably improved performance.
Would it be enough to break 150mph? Heck of a send off if so! Although again, won't happen.
Given the age of the trains, I think it's fair enough to cater for those of us who have some attachment to the days of BR. It was after all BR who built them. I'd be happy with either blue/grey or swallow - but a post privatisation livery - forget it! There'd be a riot if that happened and rightly so!I'm sure posting this is equivalent to treason, but do we really need another HST painted in the original livery?? I get that it's iconic, but HSTs have had lots of liveries over the years which, dare I say, are more interesting. I'd honestly prefer seeing it in the intercity swallow livery, or perhaps the GNER livery, the only post privatisation livery that (I think) everyone seems to like.
Bear in mind this is coming from someone born in 2000 with no attachment whatsoever to the days of British Rail.
Given the age of the trains, I think it's fair enough to cater for those of us who have some attachment to the days of BR. It was after all BR who built them. I'd be happy with either blue/grey or swallow - but a post privatisation livery - forget it! There'd be a riot if that happened and rightly so!