• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 321 with a door open for 23 minutes

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Chris M

Member
Joined
4 Feb 2012
Messages
1,057
Location
London E14
Doesn’t an alert sound if a door hasn’t closed?
I would imagine that any alerts are on the same circuit as the interlock - so if one is obtained (correctly or otherwise) then no alert will sound, and if the interlock is bypassed (for whatever reason) any alert sound will also be suppressed.
Similarly I would expect the same to be true of any exterior lights.

Immediately as soon as they found out. No amount of PR spin will make this look good for Abellio, however trivial the cause is.

Obviously like most people I'm not going to put myself in danger in situations like this - if it were on the same side as the alarm I'd probably have waited to the next stop then used the alarm at the station, or perhaps see if it rectified itself at the next stop then use the alarm on departure if it didn't. Consider this, though, what if you wandered through the train looking for the toilet and were intent on that, then suddenly found yourself in the vestibule with the open door? What if then, as we know 321s, especially Renatus units are prone to do, the train swung violently from side to side as it crossed a set of points and that person lost their footing? The odds of all that happening are very low, but certainly not impossible. Someone who doesn't have perfect balance could easily have ended up being thrown towards an open door on a service moving at speed. If there's a way someone could fall from a train through no fault of their own, however slight the chance, it's a safety breach of the highest order. As much as open doors are the norm in other countries, it's expected in their culture, which reduces the risk quite a bit. In the UK it's just not acceptable, I don't think some people are taking this one seriously enough.

The image on the RAIB website shows that it was one leaf of a double door, not in a vestibule (doors on a 321 are at ⅓ and ⅔ of the car). So there would be no suddenly finding yourself next to an open door in this case. As someone who has less that perfect balance, I'm holding on to something when I'm walking through a moving train even when there are no doors, open or otherwise, in the vicinity.
 

philthetube

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2016
Messages
3,762
I spent years standing next to open doors on trains and never came close to falling off, got paid to do it as well.

Great job being a guard on the northern line.

Being more serious if you think about how many passengers you have seen falling against closed doors, (none in my case), then take into consideration that people would know that the door was open and take more care, you realise how little risk there was in this case.
 

rg177

Established Member
Associate Staff
International Transport
Joined
22 Dec 2013
Messages
3,717
Location
Newcastle-upon-Tyne
I'm going to wager that this being a contra-peak train, there probably weren't many folk about to see the issue earlier in the journey!

I've had a few incidents abroad like this. Most recently aboard a trailer carriage attached to a "Bzmot" railcar in Hungary. When we departed the first station, the door didn't close.

When the conductor swapped into our carriage about four stations down, he rolled his eyes, leaned out and slammed it shut before having words with the driver.

Turns out that the units weren't talking to each other so the driver gave the coupler a whack and off we went, doors closed successfully.

More worryingly I caught a train driver in Portugal playing games on his phone while we were moving, sure enough a few stops down the line he forgot to close the doors and we hit 30mph or so before he pressed the close button!
 

Panupreset

Member
Joined
8 May 2015
Messages
173
There is no audible alarm in the cab to warn if a door is open on a 321. Also there is no alarm in the cab to warn if a safety system is isolated. There is on a 315/317 though.
 

OpsWeb

Member
Joined
14 Oct 2014
Messages
150
If it's the same door assy as a Class 320 - the traction & door interlock circuits use the same microswitch, which is only fitted to one leaf of the door. Both doors are (or should be) connected via rubber pulley belt in the door header gear. In other words if one door leaf (the side away from the microswitch) becomes detached from the pulley - the TIS/DI system won't know.

Having said that, the microswitches have been known to fail in the "on" position. In this (hopefully) rare situation, the doors could be wide open and the switch would say "doors closed". The door interlock system on the Class 320 is a bit "BR Basic"...(excluding the LHS/RHS door energise relays in the coaches), there are two relays in the cab ends - one for traction and one for door interlock. That's the "clunk" that can be heard when the doors shut, again relays can fail in the "energised" position, so bypassing any system system and the crew would be unaware.
 

Ambient Sheep

Member
Joined
28 Jul 2015
Messages
111
If it's the same door assy as a Class 320 - the traction & door interlock circuits use the same microswitch, which is only fitted to one leaf of the door.

o_O

What, as you indicate, could possibly go wrong with that arrangement?! Idiots.
 

MP33

Member
Joined
19 Jun 2011
Messages
413
The train could have had 12 carriages. If the open door was in the front 4 carriages, the carriage would have been almost empty. From what I have seen at Liverpool Street in the morning. Anyone looking for a seat will have no need to walk more than the rear four carriages. At the intermediate stations the front carriages do not stop near entrances and footbridges. Also the Schools and Colleges were on holiday.
 

Erniescooper

Member
Joined
27 Mar 2010
Messages
518
It does look a bit like an accident waiting to happen as all you do it for it to happen is not correctly torque up the two hangar bracket bolts which I think also retain the belt on the second door leaf
 

whhistle

On Moderation
Joined
30 Dec 2010
Messages
2,636
I find it astounding that the opinion of many posters is that "it's fine".
Seriously?
Is the general consensus that it's fine for trains in this same situation, to travel with a set of doors open?

And yet I read squabbles about yellow fronts...
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
I find it astounding that the opinion of many posters is that "it's fine".
Seriously?
Is the general consensus that it's fine for trains in this same situation, to travel with a set of doors open?

And yet I read squabbles about yellow fronts...
It's a fair point - being slightly cynical, yellow fronts are primarily for the benefit of railway staff. This issue only really affects the paying punters.
 

Edders23

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2018
Messages
549
So do guards no longer get out on to platforms and look along the train to check the doors are closed ?
 

Hadders

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
27 Apr 2011
Messages
13,144
There are no guards. It’s a driver only route.
 

Kite159

Veteran Member
Joined
27 Jan 2014
Messages
19,239
Location
West of Andover
And even if there was a guard, the open door was on the non-platform side so they wouldn't have noticed it.
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
How visible are recessed pocket sliding doors at the far end of a long train anyway?

Virtually invisible. On a lot of stock, you’d physically have to walk down and check each door at the end of the formation. It’s why plug doors are so much safer to dispatch with, albeit usually more complex to fix if they go wrong.
 

Islineclear3_1

Established Member
Joined
24 Apr 2014
Messages
5,835
Location
PTSO or platform depending on the weather
RAIB safety digest now available

https://www.gov.uk/raib-reports/saf...ign=govuk-notifications&utm_content=immediate

This incident demonstrates that the continued safe operation of train doors is reliant on there being a robust design and suitable inspection and maintenance processes. It highlights in particular the importance of:

  • specifying fastenings suitable for the environment and materials in which they are used including, when necessary, specifying and measuring an appropriate torque
  • providing a means of identifying if fastenings with a safety critical function have worked loose
  • identifying and implementing effective inspection and remedial actions when a safety critical defect is identified
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Roast Veg

Established Member
Joined
28 Oct 2016
Messages
2,200
The lessons learnt from this incident involving class 321 units are likely to have wider applicability as RAIB has identified at least 13 classes of rolling stock currently operating on the British railway network in which doors are connected to drive belts in a manner similar to the class 321 units.
I'm trying to work out exactly which classes they are referring to here - classes 150, 317-322, 455, and 456 make for only 9 classes. If you include the similarly doored PEPs (313-5, 507, 508) then the number is 14. Simple case of miscounting?
 

greatkingrat

Established Member
Joined
20 Jan 2011
Messages
2,764
I guess they mean 13 classes (in addition to the 321s), which would make 14 in total.
 

Edders23

Member
Joined
22 Sep 2018
Messages
549
From the report in the media I read a number of other units were found to have the same fault and needed remedial action apparently all since some refurbishment took place...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top