• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Will a new MD for SWR mean an end to the strike action?

Status
Not open for further replies.

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,258
Considering it is on!y an interim appointment, I do wonder why mellors is moving. Has he threatened to quit or do first just want someone new, whoever that is, in post as the new year starts?

Is Hopwood only interim until the drivers deal is sorted out and then whatever the outcome of method of working is handed over to a new MD?

Who knows?

Edit: spelling correction
What is this driver’s deal about then?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,692
Location
London
The GWR MD running SWR is an interim arrangement until a full appointment is made. Other appointments to fill gaps left behind are thus interim until everyone GWR-side goes back to where they were (spelling corrected in theironroad's post)

Thanks for pointing out the spelling, I've corrected it in my post.

However, I was aware that it was only interim, just wondered why.
 

theironroad

Established Member
Joined
21 Nov 2014
Messages
3,692
Location
London
What is this driver’s deal about then?

Your guess is as good as mine, I'm a swr driver and details are scarce.

Essentially swr drivers have a pay review every 1 April and this might be a reasonably simple 1 year deal with a inflation pay rise and no other changes to terms and conditions.

Other times it might be over hours worked or conditions.

This one is expected to be a major change because it is expected to last a few years and likely to involved door operations talks and thus takes a lot longer to negotiate. Some preliminary talks have started I believe, but both sides normally keep silent until some sort of deal is reached and then it will go to a ballot of members .
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,258
Your guess is as good as mine, I'm a swr driver and details are scarce.

Essentially swr drivers have a pay review every 1 April and this might be a reasonably simple 1 year deal with a inflation pay rise and no other changes to terms and conditions.

Other times it might be over hours worked or conditions.

This one is expected to be a major change because it is expected to last a few years and likely to involved door operations talks and thus takes a lot longer to negotiate.
Fair dos, I thought you were implying an existing dispute, but this seems more like normal business.
 

rogue246

Member
Joined
2 Dec 2019
Messages
5
Location
Surrey
Why would SWR bring the Dispute to a close they get X Amount of £ from Bookings, Sales, Tickets etc …. and X amount of ££ from the Govt for `Lost Revenue`
they appear not to be loosing out ?
 
Joined
5 May 2015
Messages
66
Location
Dunblane
Tony Miles of Modern Railways was on the "Your and Yours" programme on Radio 4 this lunchtime when he indicated that there had been a deal reached recently between South West Trains and the RMT but, subsequently, the company had been ordered by the Department of Transport to renege upon it. It will remain to be seen if the new MD is willing to accept this interference. Mellors obviously is prepared to jump when the Dept. snaps its fingers.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,258
Tony Miles of Modern Railways was on the "Your and Yours" programme on Radio 4 this lunchtime when he indicated that there had been a deal reached recently between South West Trains and the RMT but, subsequently, the company had been ordered by the Department of Transport to renege upon it. It will remain to be seen if the new MD is willing to accept this interference. Mellors obviously is prepared to jump when the Dept. snaps its fingers.
He also writes in the wnxx forum that the local RMT reached a deal at ACAS and it was overuled by RMT at national level.
Just for balance...
 

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,416
Tony Miles of Modern Railways was on the "Your and Yours" programme on Radio 4 this lunchtime when he indicated that there had been a deal reached recently between South West Trains and the RMT but, subsequently, the company had been ordered by the Department of Transport to renege upon it. It will remain to be seen if the new MD is willing to accept this interference. Mellors obviously is prepared to jump when the Dept. snaps its fingers.

it’s not outrageous for the DfT to overrule a TOC on such a deal due to the difference in planning horizons. The TOC might offer a big pay rise as they want settlement and only have to pay it for the franchise duration. The DfT has to prevent the TOC doing things that will badly affect future TOCs and the premium the taxpayer receives from now onward.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,841
He also writes in the wnxx forum that the local RMT reached a deal at ACAS and it was overuled by RMT at national level.
Just for balance...
That isn't true. A proposal was put forward by the company at the ACAS talks which was rejected by the RMT National Executive, but the deal was not acceptable to local level reps anyway.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
9,933
Why would SWR bring the Dispute to a close they get X Amount of £ from Bookings, Sales, Tickets etc …. and X amount of ££ from the Govt for `Lost Revenue`
they appear not to be loosing out ?
They may not be losing out in the short term. In the long term there will be people who stop using the railways and never return. That's a potentially big revenue hit. If it was a bus company it would withdraw routes and close garages, but the railways are much constrained and can't cut just cut back services on a whim due to reduced patronage through strike action.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
9,933
That isn't true. A proposal was put forward by the company at the ACAS talks which was rejected by the RMT National Executive, but the deal was not acceptable to local level reps anyway.
So do we know what the proposal was?
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,258
That isn't true. A proposal was put forward by the company at the ACAS talks which was rejected by the RMT National Executive, but the deal was not acceptable to local level reps anyway.
Fair enough. We the public can really only go by what is reported...
 
Last edited:

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,841
So do we know what the proposal was?
Drivers would have had full control of the doors on 701s, guards would have in effect been doing the same role as Southern OBS' on the 701s.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,841
Fair enough. We the public can really only go by what is reported...
The company did word it carefully to make it appear that it was an agreement reached with the RMT, rather than their proposal.
 

SWT_USER

Member
Joined
29 Aug 2010
Messages
858
Location
Ashford Middx

Val3ntine

Member
Joined
29 Apr 2015
Messages
370
Location
London
I think there are some guard swaps at Staines unless it's changed recently.

Strawberry hill too. New feltham and clapham depots opening could potentially have crew changeovers there maybe but that’s not known yet.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,160
I think there are some guard swaps at Staines unless it's changed recently.
2C93 1735 Waterloo-Reading used to swap at Staines until recently - not sure if it was still booked to.
 

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,181
Only reason I ask is because a method of work would need to be established for handover between guards to ensure a service doesn’t depart without a guard onboard.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
9,933

pompeyfan

Established Member
Joined
24 Jan 2012
Messages
4,181
Thanks sharing. So it looks like the negotiating teams for SWR and RMT agreed this, but it got vetoed above.

worth baring in mind though that allegedly SWR agreed to Driver open guard close on all stock including 701s, which was vetoed by the DfT. the only evidence of this though is a press release from RMT about a month ago.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
9,933
worth baring in mind though that allegedly SWR agreed to Driver open guard close on all stock including 701s, which was vetoed by the DfT. the only evidence of this though is a press release from RMT about a month ago.
I wouldn't believe any press releases from either side.
 

TEW

Established Member
Joined
16 May 2008
Messages
5,841
Thanks sharing. So it looks like the negotiating teams for SWR and RMT agreed this, but it got vetoed above.
They are the agreed minutes, not an agreement between the two parties. The first section is the common ground, then the second section is the management proposal.
 

Goldfish62

Established Member
Joined
14 Feb 2010
Messages
9,933
They are the agreed minutes, not an agreement between the two parties. The first section is the common ground, then the second section is the management proposal.
Yes, I noticed that after posting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top