Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
They can be as grumpy as they like provided they don't reject valid tickets.
They can be as grumpy as they like provided they don't reject valid tickets.
London Midland and London Overground seem to not have this problemA unhappy team is more liable to make mistakes, or at the very least be less receptive when challenged by a passenger holding a valid ticket.
If not it soon will be. The Bree Louise has gone alreadyHasn't that been knocked down for HS2?
The Great Hall was fabulous for the first 12 to 15 years or so of its existence. The rot set in in the 80s when it got cluttered up with “retail units” and associated detritus. Most have now gone, but the impression of light and space hasn’t been recovered due to the insertion of the mezzanine floor.I actually don't mind Euston itself, though some changes could do with being made. It's warm in winter and cool in summer and has an impressive Great Hall.
Oh undoubtedly. Even without it I think the station would still struggle though; the number of passengers has now increased to the extent that all the facilities (tube access; taxi rank etc.) are now inadequate.What’s wrong with it is the "Euston scrum" method of operation which is only used at a few other major stations around the UK and needs to be packed in.
Last time I travelled to Euston on a LNW advance cheapo, the automatic barrier at Euston refused to recognise the QR code. This was despite the train guard having checked it OK en-route. The gate line staff at Euston did say something to me at the time, but as they opened the barrier without any real fuss I don't recall what they said.
Dont think ive ever had a QR code that works at barriers.
A quick reset by staff usually fixes it or its not always the barrier it could be something as simple as a fingerprint on phone screen meaning code can't be fully scanned or phone screen not bright enoughOne of the gates at Euston has a broken barcode reader, I failed to open the gate with it this morning.
A quick reset by staff usually fixes it or its not always the barrier it could be something as simple as a fingerprint on phone screen meaning code can't be fully scanned or phone screen not bright enough
I do find that the laser barcode scanners that almost all gates use to be quite awkward to use. I don't get why a camera wasn't used, it works much better that way as the screen brightness is less of an issue.
Agreed - they should refer. The problem is, i suspect, time, once you factor in the Euston scrum! I will be honest I rarely have a fruity ticket for Euston ( and i also know how to "influence people" anyway) so I haven't experienced this kind of behaviour. I accept others have a different experience.
And here is the other issue. The Euston scrum can be avoided. Not announcing platforms until a few minutes before boarding despite the train being at the platform for at least half an hour means people mill about in the concourse waiting for their train to be boarding. It’s not just Euston. It’s likely all the London termini.
Weirdly, Inverness does it, but the result isn't a scrum. It's a very long, orderly queue with an entire trainload of passengers across the entire station concourse. Nobody dares cut into it, either - I've never seen anything quite like it.Most London termini do it, as do a few other termini. Not all do, though - most notably Manchester Picc doesn't and gets on just fine without it.
Weirdly, Inverness does it, but the result isn't a scrum. It's a very long, orderly queue with an entire trainload of passengers across the entire station concourse. Nobody dares cut into it, either - I've never seen anything quite like it.
Most London termini do it, as do a few other termini. Not all do, though - most notably Manchester Picc doesn't and gets on just fine without it.
Euston hasn't always done it for local services - in Silverlink days those platforms were always shown. Those are worse, as unlike VT nobody has a reservation as they don't exist.
Out of curiosity what is the reason(s) for not announcing platforms earlier? I’d always assumed (rightly or wrongly) it was to allow for quicker servicing/cleaning/etc before return journeys without passengers boarding, and to ensure crew had a sufficient rest break.
"We're sorry for the late boarding of your train but it was delayed on its inbound journey. It has now arrived in the station and is being cleaned and prepared for your journey. Please remain on the concourse and await further announcements".One (good) reason for doing this is if a train is late on its inbound journey - it avoids the inevitable crush when inbound passengers alight onto a platform thronging with outbounds.
"We're sorry for the late boarding of your train but it was delayed on its inbound journey. It has now arrived in the station and is being cleaned and prepared for your journey. Please remain on the concourse and await further announcements".
Otherwise we'd be moaning about the train not being prepared properly and reservations not loaded!
Out of curiosity what is the reason(s) for not announcing platforms earlier? I’d always assumed (rightly or wrongly) it was to allow for quicker servicing/cleaning/etc before return journeys without passengers boarding, and to ensure crew had a sufficient rest break.
One (good) reason for doing this is if a train is late on its inbound journey - it avoids the inevitable crush when inbound passengers alight onto a platform thronging with outbounds.
There are a few reasons.
One is to let the incoming passengers off before people start crowding the doors.
Another is so the train can be cleaned without said people crowding the doors getting in the way. Though that dates back to non-locking slamdoor stock - these days you could let everyone off, lock the doors and then call the platform, which for Euston would be maybe 20 minutes before. That wouldn't result in a massive rush (just as it doesn't when a LNR is called that early) - people wander down in dribs and drabs and wait by a door for them to be released. If you didn't put "boarding"[1] up until the doors were released, more people wouldn't either.
A third is to allow the reservations to be placed - but now they're electronic they place themselves without anyone boarding getting in the way. You do risk having to move if the seat comes up reserved, but that's no great issue and if you go for coach C or if applicable U you won't.
It's been a long time since I last experienced the Euston scrum, although as has been said previously this situation is not unique to Euston. It has been a problem for as long as I remember though, albeit may be much worse now.
Most London termini do it, as do a few other termini.
The layout makes it worse at Euston though, I think - at pretty much any other London terminal you can go through any of several automatic gates and filter across to your platform after that point - it's only Euston isn't it that funnels people down the ramps like that.
Why is Euston like that anyway, with the platforms below the level of the concourse?