There was a long rebuke and apology from Layla Moran on this issue, although I'm not sure of the link. Also the country actually voted more for the Lib Dems in 2019, so the country doesn't necessarily share your view.
Doesn't excuse what she did and not fit to be party leader just the same as if it were a bloke. Regardless of how many votes they received, they lost spectacularly.
That just reads like a lot of vague insults without actually saying explicitly what you think is wrong. Anyone can claim 'X is disgraceful' or 'X is useless' but unless you can point to something specific that makes X disgraceful by some reasonable standard, it doesn't mean very much. What you seem to think is obvious is clearly not obvious to the millions of people who voted LibDem at the recent election. And to be honest, it's not obvious to me either. I don't particularly support the LibDems, but neither do I see anything obviously disgraceful about them. And in terms of votes, they didn't do that badly at the recent election - they increased their vote share significantly. But, as usual, they got rather badly screwed by an electoral system that tends not to reflect national vote share very well when it produces MPs.
As I recall, the last time you tried to bad-mouth the then LibDem leader on this forum, it turned out that you were basically telling fibs. Can you do any better this time?
Have you been paying attention to the pasting they just got at the ballot box? Are you actually going to try and defend the party's performance?
Here's just some of the reasons for their failure...
Revoke article 50
Swinson's track record
Swinson herself
It was blindingly obvious they were done for. Nothing to do with the system, the same system btw in which the held over 50 seats now.....8?
Last time I tried to band mouth?? Oh you mean lies she told and her bad track record where the evidence was posted for all to see. Why can't you see what's directly in front of you? Why do you consistently try and defend a women who is guilty of causing harm to huge numbers of the general public?
You are the one making slanderous remarks against myself. The evidence was posted, you can't accept it. I now invite you to retract your slanderous statement that I've been "fibbing" when the pictorial and video evidence was clearly posted.
It's clear the nation didn't like what they had to say, and that's the part that matters....accept it.