hooverboy
On Moderation
- Joined
- 12 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 1,372
sure, but contingency plans ought to be in the works by now.
if it hasn't worked then the trains should still be subject to some kind of recompense under warranty
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
What is the cause of unreliability of Vivarail Class 230 trains?
- Thread starter ac6000cw
- Start date
- Status
if it hasn't worked then the trains should still be subject to some kind of recompense under warranty
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
DarloRich
Veteran Member
They are: one small bus and one large bus
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
It was "due to a fault on the train" on Wednesday morning. About 10 seconds after I'd retrieved the ticket from the TVM, causing me the added faff of posting it back for a refund.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
"This train is formed of one coach". Literally.
If they were permanent (until either a Vivarail reliability improvement plan was in place or other stock was available) you'd at least know what to plan for. That's the problem. It's a complete lottery.
richieb1971
Established Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 1,969
Is it absolutely out of the question to have a Thunderbird loco positioned at Bletchley or Bedford?
In the old days they did that, not that the loco was a thunderbird, just that it was BR days where locos were stabled in those locations.
Only privatization could pose a solution that involved buses. Its not like the railway is broken, every business should have contingency.
In the old days they did that, not that the loco was a thunderbird, just that it was BR days where locos were stabled in those locations.
Only privatization could pose a solution that involved buses. Its not like the railway is broken, every business should have contingency.
causton
Established Member
That wouldn't help much.
I don't know if there have been any incidents at all where the unit hasn't been able to move away under its' own power - even the "fire" one this week.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
We all thought a third unit would solve the problem that occurred when the 153 failed. The trouble is the Vivarail kit is so much less reliable that it, er, doesn't.
richieb1971
Established Member
- Joined
- 28 Jan 2013
- Messages
- 1,969
Yeah, but looking back at the thread its obvious some trains are cancelled. Talk of buses and delays etc. If you have a thunderbird stationed nearby services can resume as normal.
Why is it ok to have 37's running in Wales and East Anglia to solve stock issues but its not ok to use them on the Vale line?
I think there is more political will to get the 230's running more than anything. Which is fine, but not at the cost of the passengers service expectations in my humble opinion.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
Because of the platform length vs. level crossing/signal issue. It wasn't the case years ago, 31s top and tail on Mk2s have worked the line in the 90s.
The decision to rejig everything to 2x20m was foolish in the extreme. Had they done 2x24m instead, noting that all recent DMUs are around that length, we'd have had 2-car 172s by now and none of this issue would be happening.
Gary B
Member
Ive not heard anything from real drivers on here about the 230s. Just some whinging spotters who don't drive trains. I want to hear from the guys who put their lives at risk to drive these contraptions.
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
You must be careful not to describe regular passengers on the Marston Vale line who have used these units since inception as "whinging spotters". These are people who have been inconvenienced in past times when the units were not providing a service and have been able to relate their feelings on this thread.
I just do not know how to address an answer to the final sentence of your posting above which mentions "put their lives at risk".
43096
On Moderation
- Joined
- 23 Nov 2015
- Messages
- 15,257
You make it sound like they are driving an F1 car at 200mph. There are plenty of much more dangerous occupations out there than being a front end seat warmer.
D365
Veteran Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2012
- Messages
- 11,447
That's a strange comment to make, clearly the units have met the necessary safety requirements.
It is disappointing that unreliability of the 230s is still continuing. I can't help but wonder if it would have been simpler and more reliable to have reused the engines and transmissions from scrapped Pacers on these sets instead, even though it would have meant replacing the bogies.
Brissle Girl
Established Member
- Joined
- 17 Jul 2018
- Messages
- 2,585
Have you some information to share on recent reliability to support that comment. It's a few weeks now since there have been any adverse reports, which usually means things have settled down, but "is continuing" would suggest that things are still not all well.
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
They could just have used Pacers.
I have got some figures going back several weeks now which I will put here when I have time. If RTT is to be believed then the only train failure causing a cancellation since the fire extinguisher incident was a door problem last Monday which knocked two trains out (ie a trip to Bedford and return). The service in general on the Marston Vale line appears to be dreadful with cancellations left right and centre due to other issues.
Just to enlarge on this a bit....since the end of October (approx) there have been about 150 journeys cancelled (EXCLUDING strike days). Of these 14 were due to train faults ....(It looks like 5 separate faults but I'm not 100% sure).
DarloRich
Veteran Member
What a silly post. As if the drivers have any idea what the impact of the service failing is like. It isnt them stood in the rain when the train doesn't show. You need to wind your neck in.
As for putting thier lives at risk..........
Last edited:
transmanche
Established Member
- Joined
- 27 Feb 2011
- Messages
- 6,018
I'm no fan of the D78 stock, but this is ridiculous.
They've worked on British Rail/Railtrack/Network Rail metals since their introduction to the District line without safety concerns.
Yeah, but they didn’t have self combusting pods slung underneath then...
DarloRich
Veteran Member
They dont often catch fire!
Bob Price
Member
- Joined
- 8 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 1,034
Pacers have caught fire in the paat and in the past few days a 175 has combusted. How many times has a 230 caught fire?
The test fire was down to a malfunctioning third party part (since fixed).
The test fire was down to a malfunctioning third party part (since fixed).
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
And I for one agree with you.
and of course mentioning the 175's, how often has UK Alstom diesel stock got a bit too hot?
One thing the fire during test proved is that the fire management systems on the 230's work fine.
and as for reliability if the actual trains themselves (not just the service as a whole as that includes staff and infrastructure issues) how do they compare to said Alstom stock?, not including the 458's that Wimbledon have worked their magic on.
One thing the fire during test proved is that the fire management systems on the 230's work fine.
and as for reliability if the actual trains themselves (not just the service as a whole as that includes staff and infrastructure issues) how do they compare to said Alstom stock?, not including the 458's that Wimbledon have worked their magic on.
GRALISTAIR
Established Member
Now that might just be slight hyperbole!
Xenophon PCDGS
Veteran Member
Can you clarify your wording of "test fire"? Was that something done under factory test conditions or was that the fire that took place on a running line prior to the eventually cancelled one-year contract on the Coventry to Nuneaton line?
duffield
Established Member
If less than 10% of cancellations are due to train faults, it makes it sound like the train reliability is a bit of a side-show (not saying it doesn't need addressing, but it's really not what is making the service very poor).
Bob Price
Member
- Joined
- 8 Aug 2019
- Messages
- 1,034
That was the one, fire that took place during the test. Turned out it was a faulty component which they fixed. Lots of tests done since then with no repeat of that problem.
DarloRich
Veteran Member
Conked out this morning. Unconfirmed street word is that there was a fire.
Bit of a shock as since the new year the mechanicals have been reliable.
Bit of a shock as since the new year the mechanicals have been reliable.
- Status