• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Detailed maps showing crossover routes

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ladder23

Established Member
Joined
29 Oct 2015
Messages
1,816
hi guys,

Is there a in depth map of drawing available to see which shows the where abouts of the cross over tunnels used to get from one line to another, for maintenance trains etc and sidings?

Thanks
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

bluegoblin7

Established Member
Joined
10 May 2011
Messages
1,378
Location
JB/JP/JW
Carto Metro is significantly more accurate than even the most recent Track Maps 5. I wouldn't part money with it again.
 

AlbertBeale

Established Member
Joined
16 Jun 2019
Messages
2,750
Location
London
Yes, Carto Metro is great - though even it has the odd place where the congestion of overlaid tunnels makes it just possible to miss something. For instance - precisely in the context of this question - the Northern-Piccadilly link at Kings Cross (the sole access to the Northern from any other line, I seem to remember), between the southbound Northern and the northbound Picc, is hidden under the SSL station diagram, and if you don't know what's going on there it might just be possible to misconstrue what's being shown.
 

SlimJim1694

Member
Joined
8 Jan 2020
Messages
277
Location
Medway
Carto Metro is significantly more accurate than even the most recent Track Maps 5. I wouldn't part money with it again.

That depends on the level of accuracy you are interested in. Carto Metro is a brilliant, free, at-a-glance online resource if you are looking for a broad overview only. Track Maps gives far more local detail and distances while the London Railway Atlas makes a far more in depth geographical and historical study. I wouldn't put any one of these publications down at the expense of another. I'd suggest that Carto Metro is a great resource for the casual observer, but for anyone with a more serious interest it poses more questions than it answers... which led me on to suggesting the further reading. The original poster asked for something "in-depth".
 

Rogmi

Member
Joined
7 Nov 2013
Messages
89
Yes, Carto Metro is great - though even it has the odd place where the congestion of overlaid tunnels makes it just possible to miss something. For instance - precisely in the context of this question - the Northern-Piccadilly link at Kings Cross (the sole access to the Northern from any other line, I seem to remember), between the southbound Northern and the northbound Picc, is hidden under the SSL station diagram, and if you don't know what's going on there it might just be possible to misconstrue what's being shown.
There is actually an inset of the Kings Cross area at the top of the map (next to Cheshunt). This shows a larger, detailed version and includes the disused main line connection between the City Widened Lines and the Met / Circle line.

As the CM map is to scale, it is obviously difficult to shown everything clearly where there is a lot going on, especially at KX with the several lines at different levels in a small area (KX is probably the worst area on the map for this). It also helps to zoom right in where an area is particularly congested (1200-2400 magnification is good).
Elsewhere on the map, where there is more space, Franklin has, where necessary, drawn superimposed tracks side by side with a notation stating this. Elsewhere, tracks may have been slightly deviated from the true scale path for clarity.

@Slimjim 1694
I agree that, depending on what level of information is required, it’s better to use more than one source if necessary. By its very nature, the CM map is limited to what it can show historically. As it is a scale map, there just isn’t the space to show all the changes that have occurred over the years without it becoming unreadable in places, especially where there have been many big layout changes.

The map shows some historical information, more out of interest than specifically aiming to show everything. This is especially so on the tube lines where there are usually fewer changes over time than on the main line. Usually where the changes occur, they are often on the parts of the line that originally had main line trains running over them and thus goods yards etc. (many of which are now car parks).

I use the CM maps on a daily basis because it is a quick and easy reference if I want to look something up. However, for local, in depth, information, I will use other sources, such as the London Rail Atlas. The NLS map site is also an excellent source for looking at track layouts, with the large scale Ordnance Survey maps giving great details.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top