• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Weather Disruption caused by storm Ciara (February 9th, 10th and 11th)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

KingJ

Member
Joined
23 Dec 2012
Messages
197
Severe damage to a train near Swanley (https://mobile.twitter.com/NetworkRailSE/status/1226542055184195590) and Victoria Platforms 1-6 closed due to precariousness of the roof.

Seems the plan was to attach another unit to the rear and evacuate passengers that way, but due to damage to the conductor rail it seems the section behind this train is dead - https://twitter.com/NetworkRailSE/status/1226558705157713921

Plan B seems to be to get another train alongside and do a side-to-side evacuation - https://twitter.com/NetworkRailSE/status/1226559395452129280 .

Southeastern have also now withdrawn replacement buses between Hastings and Robertsbridge, which were covering for engineering works, due to poor road conditions - https://twitter.com/Se_Railway/status/1226553210749452291 . (Edit: Now back with a 'limited service')
 
Last edited:

geoffk

Established Member
Joined
4 Aug 2010
Messages
3,238
Given the many, many instances of trees and other obstructions on the line, plus landslides and multiple flooding instances, I wonder if *any* of the posters who were calling the reduced and speed restricted services a massive over-reaction would like to admit they were wrong? Or were they happy for their trains to plough into a large obstruction at (say) 100mph and derail? Or get stranded in deep flood water for hours?
I *was* planning to travel today but reviewed the situation this morning and decided it was not appropriate; and had I done so my journey would have been stopped due to a large tree.
How many more trees on the line are needed to persuade Network Rail to clear lineside vegetation?
 

MadCommuter

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2010
Messages
630
Largely down to non city centre street cleaning* - Autumn fallen leaves are still around in February , and drain cleaning is , I suspect , yearly + when someone complains or a blockage leads to a mini-lake. Really not good enough.

Plus there is always an argument over who's responsibility it is , and (as ever) - contracting services out leads to the usual nonsense.

Oh for the days of a City / Borough Engineer of the quality there used to be , with a flexible and directly employed workforce.

* City centre street cleaning to be fair is good. Elsewhere , not so.

Those at the front line within Council roads departments do try their best, but the ever shrinking revenue budgets, its impossible to maintain roads to the standard they should be.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,913
Location
East Anglia
Which they do, then people start complaining about it!!
Couldn't believe it when I first heard this from the tree huggers a few years ago. I sympathise with nesting birds and it's good they wait but after that I have no idea why Network Rail pamper or even listen to these fools.
 

SuperNova

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2019
Messages
957
Location
The North
Sounds great until you work away from home. I visit my girlfriend on weekends in Newcastle and work in Birmingham during the week (thankfully not for much longer!)

About to start my weekly journey from Newcastle to Birmingham, wish me luck.

Plan so far is coach Newcastle to Leeds, then Leeds to Birmingham via XC. Line blocked south of Derby at present though. :(

I hope you have a safe journey. However, the advice from the Met Office, Network Rail and TOC's was not to travel. There were amber and risk to life warnings also released by the Met Office. So could you have travelled back last night? Could you have travelled back tomorrow morning. I appreciate you just want to get home and not making a fuss, but the people I'm referencing are those laying into TOC's for no reason on social media.

Sadly it seems people have decided that the do not travel warnings don't refer to them. And I bet that 80% of those who travelled didn't need to travel.
 

duffield

Established Member
Joined
31 Jul 2013
Messages
1,344
Location
East Midlands
How many more trees on the line are needed to persuade Network Rail to clear lineside vegetation?
If NR had their way, I'm sure all trees anywhere near the line would be removed. However, they do not have a free hand in this matter; they are expected to balance the eco-benefits of trees against the operational requirements of the railway, and many trees which can threaten the railway are on private land so they can't just go in willy-nilly and chop them down.

NR have done some serious clearances in various areas recently, and got a lot of flak for it. They are in a no-win position.

Disclosure: I don't work for NR, and I didn't work for them before I retired from the rail industry last year. I have a number of serious criticisms of NR. But in this respect they have a thankless task where they will never be able to please everybody.
 

Saint66

Member
Joined
15 Dec 2013
Messages
807
Location
Herts
From St Albans South SB (grand total of 8 visitors this bleak afternoon) - 1M46 stood in the down fast platform for over an hour when an obstruction was removed from the OLE somewhere around Luton Airport Parkway - a 12 car 700 working the Bedford shuttle also stood - as could go no further , as the slow line turnback is 8 cars only !!! (juice presumably off north of Sandridge)

Anyway - all on the move from about 1645 , unless something else has happened.

There is also a tree fouling the return wire very close to the down fast just north of the station. Even though this image was taken around 16:30 the tree is as you would expect still there now.

You’ll note that it looks like this tree has fallen from a property next to the railway.
 

Attachments

  • F14DA292-47B1-4108-AFCF-191B66BAF18A.jpeg
    F14DA292-47B1-4108-AFCF-191B66BAF18A.jpeg
    3.3 MB · Views: 197

MadCommuter

Member
Joined
4 Oct 2010
Messages
630
Couldn't believe it when I first heard this from the tree huggers a few years ago. I sympathise with nesting birds and it's good they wait but after that I have no idea why Network Rail pamper or even listen to these fools.

Not necessarily fools, but have a different opinion to you.
 

ChiefPlanner

Established Member
Joined
6 Sep 2011
Messages
7,783
Location
Herts
Those at the front line within Council roads departments do try their best, but the ever shrinking revenue budgets, its impossible to maintain roads to the standard they should be.

I am sure they do - (and it is appreciated) - we need to canvass for better funding for maintenance of same , as well as for better overall infrastructure capital schemes. Remember how the "pothole" issue was , by and large, given some practical improvement.
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,651
Location
Mold, Clwyd
The Pennine (and Snowdonia) streams seem to have taken a pasting from the rain.
Meanwhile, in big river land, the Chester-Liverpool via Birkenhead (2tph) and Runcorn (1tph) seem to be holding up well.
The Warrington-Llandudno Jn (truncated by engineering work), seems to be working too, albeit with delays.
Chester-Crewe is often flood-prone but seems OK at the moment.
No real reason for Avanti not to be running as far as Llandudno Jn.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,172
How many more trees on the line are needed to persuade Network Rail to clear lineside vegetation?

Or persuade those who neighbour the railway to cut own their trees. In my experience, well over half of ‘trees on the line’ incidents are caused by trees outside the boundary fence.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Avanti are saying that they can use their ticket after 12pm tomorrow.

Which is not going to be good enough for many who would get the sack for non-attendance at work. People need to be allowed to use the early morning trains if in this position (or as early as any run). Indeed, the standard rules, if the train was cancelled, do allow the use of the next train which might well be the first morning one.
 

Scotrail314209

Established Member
Joined
1 Feb 2017
Messages
2,353
Location
Edinburgh
Thus unable to travel "back tomorrow morning"

Avanti are still willing to sell very expensive walk up anytime fares though
Which is not going to be good enough for many who would get the sack for non-attendance at work. People need to be allowed to use the early morning trains if in this position (or as early as any run). Indeed, the standard rules, if the train was cancelled, do allow the use of the next train which might well be the first morning one.


it’s what I don’t get either. I feel like Avanti are being stubborn saying they can’t use it until after 12pm. Maybe there is a reason, such as expecting units to be out of place.
 

robbeech

Established Member
Joined
11 Nov 2015
Messages
4,650
Thus unable to travel "back tomorrow morning"

Avanti are still willing to sell very expensive walk up anytime fares though

I hope you're not suggesting that operators are trying to profit from this?
 

TrafficEng

Member
Joined
13 Nov 2019
Messages
419
Location
North of London
Or persuade those who neighbour the railway to cut own their trees. In my experience, well over half of ‘trees on the line’ incidents are caused by trees outside the boundary fence.
Do Network Rail have a legal power to require adjacent landowners to manage their trees?

There is a specific section of the Highways Act 1980 that allows an authority to take action against the owners of overgrowing or dangerous trees - not used often enough - but a power NR might want to seek if they do not already have it.

It does appear falling trees are a big issue this time round.
 

Megafuss

Member
Joined
5 May 2018
Messages
643
Thus unable to travel "back tomorrow morning"

Avanti are still willing to sell very expensive walk up anytime fares though

Nope, they are trying to manage the number of people travelling. It's sounds good though for a conspiracy
 

Darandio

Established Member
Joined
24 Feb 2007
Messages
10,678
Location
Redcar
Avanti aren't allowing this. Not sure if other TOCS are

Where do they say this? On their Twitter feed they have a pinned thread, the second post simply says...

We recommend that passengers postpone their journey to tomorrow. Tickets will be valid for travel on Monday.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top