• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Future Of Caledonian Sleeper Class 86s/87

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

TimboM

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
3,732
86401 has been providing ETH to the ex-LNER Mk4 short set that’s at Wembley for training etc ahead of the Grand Central Blackpool services.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,396
It figures that ACLG are still getting use from 401. Surprised that they haven’t posted a news update, unless confidentiality precludes them from doing so.
 

D365

Veteran Member
Joined
29 Jun 2012
Messages
11,396
Also, I thought Class 86 (and Class 87) loco's were not compatible with Mk4 stock.

The Mk4 coaching stock uses a standard 1000V DC ETS supply. From what it sounds, 86401 is essentially being used as a transformer-rectifier; 25kV AC to 1000V DC.
 

Rhydgaled

Established Member
Joined
25 Nov 2010
Messages
4,568
Also, I thought Class 86 (and Class 87) locos were not compatible with Mk4 stock.
How different (internally) is a class 90 from an 87? I thought I read somewhere that the 90s were originally going to be a new subclass of 87s, if so why can 90s work with mark 4s but not 87s?
 

DJH1971

Established Member
Joined
10 Jun 2012
Messages
1,527
Location
St Helens, Merseyside
How different (internally) is a class 90 from an 87? I thought I read somewhere that the 90s were originally going to be a new subclass of 87s, if so why can 90s work with mark 4s but not 87s?
Thought it was about compatibility with the UIC system that Mk4's and Class 90's have, but Class 86 & Class 87's do not have
 

Murray J

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2019
Messages
709
Location
East Grinstead
eastleighworks13thdecember20197.jpg


attached is a photo from 13th December showing 87002 and 86101 in eastleigh works, by the looks of things it hasn't had livery applied yet.
 

Murray J

Member
Joined
10 Aug 2019
Messages
709
Location
East Grinstead
no idea, just to be clear they're not my photos. my guess is at least one will be put into intercity livery and/or BR blue/electric blue.
 

DBS92042

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2019
Messages
1,281
Info on WNXX says that is the case, it should look 'interesting' in WCRC sludge, if ever there was a company that really did need a change of livery
Hopefully they chose to do a BR electric blue similar to 86259 seeing as that looks miles better than the WCRC maroon.
 

Flying Snail

Established Member
Joined
12 Dec 2006
Messages
1,625
I thought ACLG were a preservation group, how does selling their "preserved" locos to commercial operators fit in with that?
 

ExRes

Established Member
Joined
16 Dec 2012
Messages
5,761
Location
Back in Sussex
I thought ACLG were a preservation group, how does selling their "preserved" locos to commercial operators fit in with that?

As I understand it there wasn't the work available for the 86s to pay their way, the group chose to use their funds on their other locos
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,162
I thought ACLG were a preservation group, how does selling their "preserved" locos to commercial operators fit in with that?
They appear to have become the "AC Early Experiments and Oddball Prototype Group". It seems rather short sighted not to have an example of the most numerous electric loco class we've had and an indecent haste to dispose of locos after the GBRf contract finished. That the locos have ended up sold for mainline use with LSL and WCRC - both organisations that have hired in locos from preservation - makes it even stranger. All smacks of there not being the appetite to keep them.

Shame because the ACLG was for many years a highly regarded group, but it's hard to avoid the conclusion that somewhere along the way they've lost the plot.
 

superjohn

Member
Joined
11 Mar 2011
Messages
531
I thought ACLG were a preservation group, how does selling their "preserved" locos to commercial operators fit in with that?
They also have to be a realistic group. They couldn’t find more mainline work and electric locos can’t generate an income on preserved lines as diesels can. They need to make ends meet and if the sale of the locos helps towards that then it is a sensible decision. There are still class 86 locos in service. What’s to say they won’t be able to pick up a bargain (or better yet, a donation) from Freightliner in due course.

Hard decisions have to be made in preservation. The work done on the 89 suggests they have a plan and they are following it.
 

The Bear

Member
Joined
11 Sep 2019
Messages
82
Location
Cumbria
Hopefully they chose to do a BR electric blue similar to 86259 seeing as that looks miles better than the WCRC maroon.
Like yourself I sincerely hope it doesn't get dipped in the usual high gloss carriage marroon.


I thought ACLG were a preservation group, how does selling their "preserved" locos to commercial operators fit in with that?
I think 86101, 86401 & 87002 were always seen as commercial by the ACLG hierarchy and have had to pay their way.
Look at 86213 - once the work as a depot shunting/ETH supply loco dried up off it went.


As I understand it there wasn't the work available for the 86s to pay their way, the group chose to use their funds on their other locos
That is a fair point and also if taken on by another operator there would probably have to be a significant amount of crew training bearing in mind although similar we're effectively talking about 3 unique locos which will have their own handling characteristics.
Only some of GBRF, Freightliner, WCRC & now LSL drivers who will currently sign Tap-changers.


They appear to have become the "AC Early Experiments and Oddball Prototype Group". It seems rather short sighted not to have an example of the most numerous electric loco class we've had and an indecent haste to dispose of locos after the GBRf contract finished. That the locos have ended up sold for mainline use with LSL and WCRC - both organisations that have hired in locos from preservation - makes it even stranger. All smacks of there not being the appetite to keep them.

Shame because the ACLG was for many years a highly regarded group, but it's hard to avoid the conclusion that somewhere along the way they've lost the plot.
Unless anyone can tell me different I believe most the profits from the GBRF/Sleeper hire contract has been ploughed into 89001 which they must have some kind of master plan for.
As for the two early AC's that could technically be made operation (the 81 & the 85), from what I've read mainline is not an aspiration.
 

Ashley Hill

Established Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
3,199
Location
The West Country
Having never had an 82/83/84 for haulage it's a shame one of them couldn't be restored for mainline/Railtour use. CDF-PAD seems a good wheeze once the tunnel is sorted.
 

xotGD

Established Member
Joined
4 Feb 2017
Messages
6,063
Having never had an 82/83/84 for haulage it's a shame one of them couldn't be restored for mainline/Railtour use. CDF-PAD seems a good wheeze once the tunnel is sorted.
Agreed. I regret not taking 82s or 83s when I had the chance. Just stood spotting at Carlisle instead!

It's a bit strange seeing people getting all misty eyed over an 86 when back in the day you'd curse when one turned up instead of a Roarer.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,786
Location
West Riding
Agreed. I regret not taking 82s or 83s when I had the chance. Just stood spotting at Carlisle instead!

It's a bit strange seeing people getting all misty eyed over an 86 when back in the day you'd curse when one turned up instead of a Roarer.

Fashions change.

I was born in 1990, so an 86 has always been something to get misty eyed over ever since they were replaced by 390's/221's. My age group can't be fussy, any old loco will do!
 

James James

Member
Joined
29 Jan 2018
Messages
426
Thought it was about compatibility with the UIC system that Mk4's and Class 90's have, but Class 86 & Class 87's do not have
Isn't UIC primarily relevant for the door control/intercom? If yes, could still be using 86/87s for Mk4 for heating/dragging, as long as they aren't in passenger service. (I could be completely wrong here though.)

(Yeah I know who the UIC really are, but the primary usage I know of is in reference to the 13/18 pole UIC cables used on many continental trains.)
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,162
I think 86101, 86401 & 87002 were always seen as commercial by the ACLG hierarchy and have had to pay their way.
Look at 86213 - once the work as a depot shunting/ETH supply loco dried up off it went.

Unless anyone can tell me different I believe most the profits from the GBRF/Sleeper hire contract has been ploughed into 89001 which they must have some kind of master plan for.
Given that at least one of the locos now sold was effectively donated, the view of them as commercial might be viewed rather differently by others.

Must be a lot of money going into 89001 given the profits from selling the 3 locos and the GBRf hire contract should have been pretty lucrative, too.
 

TheBeard

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2014
Messages
125
I think from a good look years ago that the 85 is practically operational and a lot of switch gear on another early one, and a couple are stripped. That said. NR won't allow any of these explosive locos anywhere near its wires!
Therefore, they labour on Badger, which is their pet. if the 87 goes abroad, it will be a shame I think there'd be scope for tours with the 86/87 but they seem to be focused on the 89. Perhaps its the BLackpool Thunderbird to be?
 

captainbigun

Member
Joined
3 May 2009
Messages
977
Some facts....

The 87 wasn’t donated, there was a complex arrangement, but it mostly definitely wasn’t a donation.

The 87 has not gone abroad!

Some folk clearly can’t read or don’t want to read. This topic has been well covered in numerous places.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top