• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Lothian Buses and ECB Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
I take it the ECB PVR increases with all that? Is there flex in the existing fleet or new vehicles due that soon?

If these changes are reliant on deliveries it feels a bit high risk given that whatever it will be will be a new type for the fleet and will need testing / familiarisation?
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
8,169
What other changes can we expect over the next 3 years? No12 never going back to leith, I can the 16 getting rerouted and 22 curtailed.
 

TheEastCoaster

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
1,220
I’m extremely curious about the new night bus services N14 and N49,

I knew Lothian had a N14 the last few Hogmanay but now we have the full thing here to replace the N7! I think another night bus to the Hospital is a good idea especially linking it with Greendykes

The N49 was definitely a surprise, seemed like a missed opportunity to have it run from the Royal Infirmary instead of Surgeons Hall, but hey Lochend finally has a night bus service again after all these years and it runs directly to the jewel!
 

A330Alex

Member
Joined
13 Feb 2019
Messages
223
What other changes can we expect over the next 3 years? No12 never going back to leith, I can the 16 getting rerouted and 22 curtailed.
The initial council plans for post-tram were:
• Route 1 extended from Easter Road to Seafield (to replace route 12)
• Route 10 diverted via MacDonald Rd and Bonnington Rd away from Leith Walk
• Route 12 cancelled between St Andrew Square and Seafield
• Route 16 diverted via The Shore and Henderson St away from Constitution St replacing route 22
• Route 22 cancelled between Leith St and Ocean Terminal
• Route 25 diverted via Constitution St and The Links part replacing routes 12 and 16
Seems they're getting a head start with the 1/12 and 10.
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
8,169
THe big question has to be what does Lothian have planned to replace the these cuts, one hopes they have ideas to improve the network elsewhere in the city,
 

gavin1985

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2019
Messages
72
Location
Edinburgh
THe big question has to be what does Lothian have planned to replace the these cuts, one hopes they have ideas to improve the network elsewhere in the city,

Agreed it seems to be Corstophine and City Centre that always benefits from buses.

Ideally I would increase the frequency of the 200 and 400 to match the 300, make all Skylink's express buses. Far too many stops on the 400 which is highly depressing just getting to Calder Road from the Airport!
 

overthewater

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2012
Messages
8,169
How about improvements else where in the city? like sorting out no30. Making the 200 every 10mins from Ingliston - granton to help combat the traffic, etc
 

CN04NRJ

Established Member
Joined
28 Nov 2019
Messages
1,714
Location
UK
Agreed it seems to be Corstophine and City Centre that always benefits from buses.

Ideally I would increase the frequency of the 200 and 400 to match the 300, make all Skylink's express buses. Far too many stops on the 400 which is highly depressing just getting to Calder Road from the Airport!


It's depressing enough trying to get down Calder road at the moment with those roadworks
 

TheEastCoaster

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
1,220
Ideally I would increase the frequency of the 200 and 400 to match the 300, make all Skylink's express buses. Far too many stops on the 400 which is highly depressing just getting to Calder Road from the Airport!

There’s no way the Skylinks will work as expresses, since they are meant to be local services that just happen to go to the airport, the 100 makes sense as it’s a premium service direct to the city centre, and the 200/300/400 are just revamps of the 32/35/18 respectively
 

gavin1985

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2019
Messages
72
Location
Edinburgh
There’s no way the Skylinks will work as expresses, since they are meant to be local services that just happen to go to the airport, the 100 makes sense as it’s a premium service direct to the city centre, and the 200/300/400 are just revamps of the 32/35/18 respectively

Personally my issue is that there are just far too many stops in Edinburgh itself. Whilst I agree with you that Skylink are revamps of previous buses, I still believe they should be some form of express buses, what Lothian could do is additional non Skylink buses to sections of the routes that would compliment the express Skylink.

Fair enough not as limited stop as the 100, but nothing compared to the 80+ stops on 400 and 50+ stops on the 200/300.
 
Joined
14 Dec 2018
Messages
1,163
Would a Skylink 500 service work, possibly as an extension on the 140? Ie. Mussleburgh, Dalkeith, Bonnyrigg, Lasswade, Loanhead, along Niven's Knowe Road, Straiton, then the bypass then Gyle Centre (?), RBS Gogarburn (?), P&R then Airport. It would give people in towns from Dalkeith to Straiton a faster link to the Airport, RBS and Gyle Centre than the 400. People in Mussleburgh though might still be faster going into town and changing for the 100?
 

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
Would a Skylink 500 service work, possibly as an extension on the 140? Ie. Mussleburgh, Dalkeith, Bonnyrigg, Lasswade, Loanhead, along Niven's Knowe Road, Straiton, then the bypass then Gyle Centre (?), RBS Gogarburn (?), P&R then Airport. It would give people in towns from Dalkeith to Straiton a faster link to the Airport, RBS and Gyle Centre than the 400. People in Mussleburgh though might still be faster going into town and changing for the 100?

Whilst I'm sure if it was tried it would pick up custom I wouldn't put bypass and faster in the same sentence unless your barring running between 7-10am and 4-7pm. Its carnage then!
 
Joined
14 Dec 2018
Messages
1,163
Whilst I'm sure if it was tried it would pick up custom I wouldn't put bypass and faster in the same sentence unless your barring running between 7-10am and 4-7pm. Its carnage then!
Is there an emergency lane on the left which could be turned into a bus lane for when the traffic is heavy?
 

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
Is there an emergency lane on the left which could be turned into a bus lane for when the traffic is heavy?
Not consistently, and as it's an A road the on/off ramps aren't built to Motorway standard sadly. I think Lothian avoid doing anything but crossing it where it can't be avoided (Sheriffhall) and running off peak dead runs down with good reason!
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,175
Would a Skylink 500 service work, possibly as an extension on the 140? Ie. Mussleburgh, Dalkeith, Bonnyrigg, Lasswade, Loanhead, along Niven's Knowe Road, Straiton, then the bypass then Gyle Centre (?), RBS Gogarburn (?), P&R then Airport. It would give people in towns from Dalkeith to Straiton a faster link to the Airport, RBS and Gyle Centre than the 400. People in Mussleburgh though might still be faster going into town and changing for the 100?
was said ages ago and it’s probobly the most pointless thing ive ever seen proposed on this forum

Personally my issue is that there are just far too many stops in Edinburgh itself. Whilst I agree with you that Skylink are revamps of previous buses, I still believe they should be some form of express buses, what Lothian could do is additional non Skylink buses to sections of the routes that would compliment the express Skylink.

Fair enough not as limited stop as the 100, but nothing compared to the 80+ stops on 400 and 50+ stops on the 200/300.
why make it an express? absolutely no need. the 300 and 400 especially are used well in both directions at peak times and removing stops would be ridiculous. the only way i could see an express 400 POTENTIALLY work would be a similar sutuation to Londons express 607 along Uxbrridge road where the west half is shadowed by the 427 and east shadowed by 207
 

OmniCity999

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2018
Messages
1,283
Location
Scotland
I take it the ECB PVR increases with all that? Is there flex in the existing fleet or new vehicles due that soon?

If these changes are reliant on deliveries it feels a bit high risk given that whatever it will be will be a new type for the fleet and will need testing / familiarisation?

New vehicles arriving soon although they'll not need to provide type training as their all similar enough to what's already around.

If they do need to provide type training, for whatever reason, they can keep some B7's on for a bit.

Although new deliveries are rumoured at Enviro400 bodied B5LH and B5TL's. We already have Enviro bodied vehicles in the fleet and we already have B5TL and B5LH's. Which coveres mechanical knowledge and body knowledge. Same with singles and the B8RLE. We already have B8RLE and the B8L in the fleet.
 

cnjb8

Established Member
Joined
26 Feb 2019
Messages
2,127
Location
Nottingham
New vehicles arriving soon although they'll not need to provide type training as their all similar enough to what's already around.

If they do need to provide type training, for whatever reason, they can keep some B7's on for a bit.

Although new deliveries are rumoured at Enviro400 bodied B5LH and B5TL's. We already have Enviro bodied vehicles in the fleet and we already have B5TL and B5LH's. Which coveres mechanical knowledge and body knowledge. Same with singles and the B8RLE. We already have B8RLE and the B8L in the fleet.
Just out of interest, why do you specify buses with glazed staircases? It's not a criticism but I've always wondered why.
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,175
Just out of interest, why do you specify buses with glazed staircases? It's not a criticism but I've always wondered why.
because its high spec. always found this as a bit unfair for advertisers as this means they cant, unless they get a mod, use t-adverts on them and at the rate Lothian are going they’ll have none of those in 5 years time
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,797
Location
Dundee
was said ages ago and it’s probobly the most pointless thing ive ever seen proposed on this forum
It’s not a pointless proposal. There’s definitely a market for East and Midlothian to the Airport/Gyle area. If the bypass didn’t suffer from such bad congestion it would be perfect.
 

scosutsut

Member
Joined
1 Jan 2019
Messages
933
Location
scosutsut
New vehicles arriving soon although they'll not need to provide type training as their all similar enough to what's already around.

If they do need to provide type training, for whatever reason, they can keep some B7's on for a bit.

Although new deliveries are rumoured at Enviro400 bodied B5LH and B5TL's. We already have Enviro bodied vehicles in the fleet and we already have B5TL and B5LH's. Which coveres mechanical knowledge and body knowledge. Same with singles and the B8RLE. We already have B8RLE and the B8L in the fleet.
This is true, thanks for the explanation!
 

ScotRail158725

Established Member
Joined
27 Nov 2018
Messages
2,175
It’s not a pointless proposal. There’s definitely a market for East and Midlothian to the Airport/Gyle area. If the bypass didn’t suffer from such bad congestion it would be perfect.
there may be a market but certainly not a big enough market that would warrant a route let alone an express route along the bypass. not everywhere needs a direct bus route to everywhere. if i was making a journey from wherever in Midlothian i wouldnt mind changing one bus in the city centre
 

FlybeDash8Q400

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
1,715
Location
Edinburgh
I’m assuming X15/124 timetables will be done so that they provide a combined 15 min frequency between Eastfield and Lothian Road.

I do think people in Portobello might get confused at first when it stops everywhere, either way hopefully it works as it’d be good if it continued.
 

TheEastCoaster

Established Member
Joined
26 Jun 2018
Messages
1,220
I’m assuming X15/124 timetables will be done so that they provide a combined 15 min frequency between Eastfield and Lothian Road.

I do think people in Portobello might get confused at first when it stops everywhere, either way hopefully it works as it’d be good if it continued.

That is probably it, which explains the frequency increase on Saturdays for the 124 and with the combination of the X15 on Monday to Friday
 

gavin1985

Member
Joined
1 Jul 2019
Messages
72
Location
Edinburgh
why make it an express? absolutely no need. the 300 and 400 especially are used well in both directions at peak times and removing stops would be ridiculous. the only way i could see an express 400 POTENTIALLY work would be a similar sutuation to Londons express 607 along Uxbrridge road where the west half is shadowed by the 427 and east shadowed by 207

That's exactly what I suggested, adding a Lothian bus to compliment the express 400, I was not saying make it an express and leave the rest to dry. As an airport bus it should be a faster journey end to end. The 400 simply doesn't do this, especially between the airport and Calder Road for example.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top