A human body dissipate around 100W of heat. Thus a packed train might have 1000 pasengers on board and (say) there is a headway of 2 minutes with an average passing time of 20 seconds. That's equivalent to a continuous dissipation of 100kW x 120/20 ~= 17kW. Now compare that with the power drawn by the traction system, maybe a maximum of 30% of the time in Central London with a thermal efficiency of 70%. As a guess, the installed power in '92 stock is around 1.0 MW so the heat contribution of the trains electric would be 1000kW x0.3x0.3 #= when running in central London sections which is about 90kW over the whole journey. So the human contribution of a crush loaded train would be around 20% of the train's power load. That figure would be valid for less than about 15% of all time. A lower figure would be in quieter times.Thanks guys. I was under the impression that body heat from passengers was part of the problem as well as just brake heat.
Utterly trivial compared with the other aspects of this of course but it will be interesting to see if this makes even a slight difference to tube temperatures- enough to measure if not to feel.
Don’t suppose they could send a big Dyson on wheels round to get rid of some of the dust...
There have been plans for quite some time to design, build, and use such a train (the job is currently done manually, which stretches how effective it can be). Unfortunately nothing has yet materialised.
A human body dissipate around 100W of heat.
Clearly the values isn't exactly the same for all persons, but I've been aware of a nominal value of 300-350BTUs/hr from decades ago. 341BTUs/hr = 100W. It's true that an extreme athlete/cyclist can generate as much as 400W for short periods, but that isn't relevant here, - unless they are having to push the train along.I have seen figures ten times that ie 1kw. No idea what the true value is though.
https://uk.ramboll.com/projects/ruk/heating-up-londonI wonder if all this stored heat will ever be put to good use at some point.