• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Could we see additional services once improvements are made in the Huddersfield area?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Railwaysceptic

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2017
Messages
1,409
It could do a good trade if it is competitive, driving/buses between the two is a pain and rail passengers probably view changing at Leeds as a pain too.

I know the GC service exists but it's hardly competitive on time and not particularly frequent.
Hold the front page! Trans Pennine is not my neck of the woods and I know this is slightly off-topic, but is there no regular service between Halifax and Wakefield Kirkgate? How do people travel between Halifax and Lincoln, Sheffield and Doncaster?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,672
Location
Another planet...
Hold the front page! Trans Pennine is not my neck of the woods and I know this is slightly off-topic, but is there no regular service between Halifax and Wakefield Kirkgate? How do people travel between Halifax and Lincoln, Sheffield and Doncaster?
Grand Central directly link Halifax with Wakefield 4 times per day. At other times, they're probably the most poorly-linked of any of the "council seat" settlements in West Yorkshire, requiring travel via Leeds.

For Halifax to Sheffield/Doncaster and beyond, other than the infrequent GC service the options are to change at Leeds or Huddersfield.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,938
Location
West Riding
Hold the front page! Trans Pennine is not my neck of the woods and I know this is slightly off-topic, but is there no regular service between Halifax and Wakefield Kirkgate? How do people travel between Halifax and Lincoln, Sheffield and Doncaster?

There's nothing transpennine about Bradford/Halifax-Wakefield.

Well, it depends on your definition of regular; 4 trains per day isn't mine, and it's a pretty unreliable 4tpd too. And as I said, they aren't the fastest either. A direct hourly service between Bradford and Wakefield could be well used I think especially considering the stations on the route have decent populations and the roads between them aren't great, if you could squeeze it between Ravensthorpe and Heaton Lodge that is. Is it a priority though? Not really.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,672
Location
Another planet...
OK, as suggestions they're off-topic I agree, but on the other hand as opportunities, they could be very relevant to the project. You make some very good points regarding existing local stations on Wakefield - Leeds if that was proposed to be made 'express only', and those passengers would have to be catered for Somehow. Please DO NOT imply I'm a flippin crayonista. Suggestions alone do not constitute irrationality, which is what that term tends to convey. Irrationality is reiterating such pet ideas relentlessly in the face of valid criticism, which you make and I have responded to above. As to the Spen, there's continuous population all along that valley today which could plausibly support some kind of segregated light metro perhaps partly at least on the last remaining rail alignment in the corridor. It need not even be rail technology, but rail might make sense employing tram-trains to use existing infrastructure into Bradford. Anyway no one will ever know what those ideas were because I have now deleted them along with all my other comments on this project, becasue clearly as a mere crayon waver my ideas and opinion are all completely worthless. Thanks for pointing that out.

First of all, you've clearly taken my comment to heart so I apologise for upsetting you. However I never called you a crayonista, I said that the idea you proposed (tram-trains up the Spen Valley many miles away from an existing tramway) was a crayonista suggestion. I was criticising the idea, not the individual making the idea.

Again apologies for coming across as flippant. Your suggestions are almost always well-researched and thought out, so I was particularly surprised that you made a suggestion that didn't meet that standard (in my opinion).
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,249
Location
Torbay
First of all, you've clearly taken my comment to heart so I apologise for upsetting you. However I never called you a crayonista, I said that the idea you proposed (tram-trains up the Spen Valley many miles away from an existing tramway) was a crayonista suggestion. I was criticising the idea, not the individual making the idea.

Again apologies for coming across as flippant. Your suggestions are almost always well-researched and thought out, so I was particularly surprised that you made a suggestion that didn't meet that standard (in my opinion).
Thanks. I appreciate your comments. Blame it on cabin fever. Guess we're all under a lot of pressure at the moment.
 

Railwaysceptic

Established Member
Joined
6 Nov 2017
Messages
1,409
Grand Central directly link Halifax with Wakefield 4 times per day. At other times, they're probably the most poorly-linked of any of the "council seat" settlements in West Yorkshire, requiring travel via Leeds.

For Halifax to Sheffield/Doncaster and beyond, other than the infrequent GC service the options are to change at Leeds or Huddersfield.
Thank you for that. I'm appalled and astonished. Halifax and Wakefield are substantial towns and I'd have thought a Lincoln to Halifax and Bradford service via Doncaster and Wakefield Kirkgate would be well patronised. A Nottingham and Sheffield service might do well too.
 

NorthernSpirit

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
2,184
In any case, anything involving Spen Valley or a new curve at Dewsbury is beyond the remit of the consultation under discussion here. If the Spen Valley routes had never existed, nobody would be proposing to build them now.

Once the Transpennine Route Upgrade is completed over the Huddersfield to Westtown section of the route, could the next step be reintroducing heavy rail up the Spen to Low Moor to allow for a Huddersfield > Brighouse > Halifax > Bradford > Cleckheaton Central > Wakefield > Leeds service?

It'd take a number of buses off the road around Cleckheaton but more importantly it would complement the TRU by allowing towns to be reconnected to the rail network and adding them on to the the exisiting services where passengers can interchange at either Leeds, Bradford or Huddersfield for TransPennine services.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,249
Location
Torbay
Once the Transpennine Route Upgrade is completed over the Huddersfield to Westtown section of the route, could the next step be reintroducing heavy rail up the Spen to Low Moor...
I'd say heavy rail is most unlikely for any Spen Valley development, as although the old alignment is mostly unobstructed and has no old road crossings I'm aware of, in Heckmondwike a small new estate has been constructed either side of and very close to the railway, including an access road right across the old trackbed. Developers have otherwise at least retained a wide clear route through that estate, currently used by NCN66 which extends the length of the old alignment, and might be able to coexist to some extent with a lighter solution such as a predominantly single track light rail or a busway, although would need some considerable reconstruction itself and possible diversion in places. If tram-train vehicles were used on a light rail branch, they might be able to get into Bradford city centre via the existing heavy rail route from a junction at Low Moor.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,672
Location
Another planet...
Once the Transpennine Route Upgrade is completed over the Huddersfield to Westtown section of the route, could the next step be reintroducing heavy rail up the Spen to Low Moor to allow for a Huddersfield > Brighouse > Halifax > Bradford > Cleckheaton Central > Wakefield > Leeds service?

Your Huddersfield to Leeds via everywhere service suggestions seems a bit circuitous

It'd take a number of buses off the road around Cleckheaton but more importantly it would complement the TRU by allowing towns to be reconnected to the rail network and adding them on to the the exisiting services where passengers can interchange at either Leeds, Bradford or Huddersfield for TransPennine services.
I doubt the next phase of the upgrade will involve much if anything outside the existing footprint of the railway. Dynamic loops at Batley would be useful, and by relocating the station to the bridge carrying Soothill Lane over the railway these could be accommodated within existing railway land. Anything involving new or reopened alignments would be dealt with as a separate project, but if some sort of "reversing Beeching" thing forms part of a post-Corona stimulus package there might be some potential.

Not sure about your proposed service via Spen Valley to be honest, seems a bit circuitous and doesn't replicate any existing bus routes in its entirety- which suggests low demand over the whole route. Nobody would choose to travel from Bradford or Halifax to Leeds via Wakefield.

[Cynic]
Though as Batley & Spen was one of the few seats that didn't turn blue in December it might not be top of the list for investment!
[/cynic]
 
Last edited:

BrianW

Established Member
Joined
22 Mar 2017
Messages
1,456
[Cynic]
Though as Batley & Spen was one of the few seats that didn't turn blue in December it might not be top of the list for investment!
[/cynic][/QUOTE]

I'm expecting to see something like:
Barrow-in-Furness, Blackpool, Bolton, Bury, Blackburn, Burnley, Blyth and Bishop Auckland.
You could also include Batley and Bradford, and Halifax and Huddersfield.
The Beeching/ Blue Line- Low Speed 3?
Cynic/2
 

AndyHudds

Member
Joined
17 Jun 2012
Messages
534
I doubt the next phase of the upgrade will involve much if anything outside the existing footprint of the railway. Dynamic loops at Batley would be useful, and by relocating the station to the bridge carrying Soothill Lane over the railway these could be accommodated within existing railway land. Anything involving new or reopened alignments would be dealt with as a separate project, but if some sort of "reversing Beeching" thing forms part of a post-Corona stimulus package there might be some potential.

Not sure about your proposed service via Spen Valley to be honest, seems a bit circuitous and doesn't replicate any existing bus routes in its entirety- which suggests low demand over the whole route. Nobody would choose to travel from Bradford or Halifax to Leeds via Wakefield.

[Cynic]
Though as Batley & Spen was one of the few seats that didn't turn blue in December it might not be top of the list for investment!
[/cynic]

I would like to see the Spen Valley reopen but it would need some serious engineering to put in a spur towards Leeds and a serious curve to turn towards Huddersfield to bring all the Town fans in. The market in the Spen Valley would be for Leeds and Huddersfield not towards Wakefield although if the Horbury Curve was to be reopened too if would give Bradford access to Sheffield and the East Midlands. Again the reality of the closure, it was a shocking error, given the population of the Spen Valley.
 

modernrail

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2015
Messages
1,054
Yes: apologies.
Cabin fever thoughts.

-Is there anything transpennine about Manchester to Edinburgh?
-I have never seen a map that completely defines the extent of the Pennines with a clear boundary.
- 'Trans' means across. Is a route 'Transpennine' if it crosses a single Pennine hill? Perhaps something that crosses more than one is also a 'Transpennines Express'?
- Are the foothills of the Pennines, such as the hills you would need to run through to get from Bradford to Wakefield, not also Pennines? They are surely 'the foothills of' and so they are also some of the Pennines.
- Therefore is there not something very transpennine about Bradford to Wakefield?
 

SuperNova

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2019
Messages
957
Location
The North
Cabin fever thoughts.

-Is there anything transpennine about Manchester to Edinburgh?
-I have never seen a map that completely defines the extent of the Pennines with a clear boundary.
- 'Trans' means across. Is a route 'Transpennine' if it crosses a single Pennine hill? Perhaps something that crosses more than one is also a 'Transpennines Express'?
- Are the foothills of the Pennines, such as the hills you would need to run through to get from Bradford to Wakefield, not also Pennines? They are surely 'the foothills of' and so they are also some of the Pennines.
- Therefore is there not something very transpennine about Bradford to Wakefield?

Gareth Dennis did a good YouTube chat on this the other day. Watch it - it's great.

And yes, Manchester to Edinburgh via Diggle, is TransPennine as it goes, under the Pennines!
 

AndyHudds

Member
Joined
17 Jun 2012
Messages
534
Cabin fever thoughts.

-Is there anything transpennine about Manchester to Edinburgh?
-I have never seen a map that completely defines the extent of the Pennines with a clear boundary.
- 'Trans' means across. Is a route 'Transpennine' if it crosses a single Pennine hill? Perhaps something that crosses more than one is also a 'Transpennines Express'?
- Are the foothills of the Pennines, such as the hills you would need to run through to get from Bradford to Wakefield, not also Pennines? They are surely 'the foothills of' and so they are also some of the Pennines.
- Therefore is there not something very transpennine about Bradford to Wakefield?

Geographically the Pennines extend from the Peak District to the borders of Scotland.

Bradford to Wakefield does not cross the Pennines.
 

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,916
Location
Nottingham
Sheffield to Manchester via Edale only barely crosses the Pennines too... ;)
The Pennine Way starts at Edale station and finishes on the Scottish border, so by that definition Newcastle-Carlisle is also a Transpennine route.

Liverpool/Manchester to Glasgow/Edinburgh doesn't go near the Pennines at all.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
17,672
Location
Another planet...
The Pennine Way starts at Edale station and finishes on the Scottish border, so by that definition Newcastle-Carlisle is also a Transpennine route.

Liverpool/Manchester to Glasgow/Edinburgh doesn't go near the Pennines at all.
Liverpool to Edinburgh does cross the Pennines, as it runs via Diggle.
 

MarkyT

Established Member
Joined
20 May 2012
Messages
6,249
Location
Torbay
True, I was thinking of the group of services that runs via Preston which is Manchester to Glasgow/Edinburgh and Liverpool to Glasgow only.
They were some of the former Scottish West Coast routes taken out of the Cross Country portfolio weren't they? Maybe they don't sit well with TP if you concentrate on the 'Pennineness' of them, but on the other hand as part of a kind of 'Northern Cross Country', they make more sense. Lends weight to the idea of combining TP with XC perhaps?
 

quantinghome

Established Member
Joined
1 Jun 2013
Messages
2,264
They were some of the former Scottish West Coast routes taken out of the Cross Country portfolio weren't they? Maybe they don't sit well with TP if you concentrate on the 'Pennineness' of them, but on the other hand as part of a kind of 'Northern Cross Country', they make more sense. Lends weight to the idea of combining TP with XC perhaps?
Perhaps the TP routes which parallel but do not cross the Pennines should be renamed the Cispennine express?
 

modernrail

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2015
Messages
1,054
Gareth Dennis did a good YouTube chat on this the other day. Watch it - it's great.

And yes, Manchester to Edinburgh via Diggle, is TransPennine as it goes, under the Pennines!
I will thanks! I was thinking of the TPE route via WCML :)

We also seem to have got into the habit of calling trains that don't actually go that fast 'Express' in the UK. A la....

- Stansted Express (just slow)
- Gatwick Express (couple of mins quicker than normal Southern service)
- Transpennine Express (slower than LNER and Avanti on routes it shares)

They should really be called 'not that fast but misses a few stops and sounds better with express in the title'

Meanwhile the genuine express services don't have Express in the title.
 
Last edited:

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,938
Location
West Riding
I will thanks! I was thinking of the TPE route via WCML :)

We also seem to have got into the habit of calling trains that don't actually go that fast 'Express' in the UK. A la....

- Stansted Express (just slow)
- Gatwick Express (couple of mins quicker than normal Southern service)
- Transpennine Express (slower than LNER and Avanti on routes it shares)

They should really be called 'not that fast but misses a few stops and sounds better with express in the title'

Meanwhile the genuine express services don't have Express in the title.

But when you compare TP to Northern, it's very express... ...it's all relative.
 

tbtc

Veteran Member
Joined
16 Dec 2008
Messages
17,882
Location
Reston City Centre
Thank you for that. I'm appalled and astonished. Halifax and Wakefield are substantial towns and I'd have thought a Lincoln to Halifax and Bradford service via Doncaster and Wakefield Kirkgate would be well patronised. A Nottingham and Sheffield service might do well too.

I'm not sure about the significance of Lincoln... but the problem with all of the well intentioned West Yorkshire ideas on threads like this is that neither Bradford - Halifax - Huddersfield nor Huddersfield - Wakefield particularly trouble the capacity of a single 153 (whilst services from Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield into Leeds often run with many passengers forced to stand)... I'm sure that there must be *some* demand for Bradford - Wakefield but it's not going to be much faster than going via Leeds, and going via Leeds is where most of the demand is.

Maybe part of the problem is that Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield are broadly similar second tier places in West Yorkshire (each with their hinterlands, of course), so there's not much in one that residents of another will have a huge need for (e.g. similar mix of jobs/retail), whereas Leeds is in a whole separate tier, so there's a distinct need to leave Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield to work/shop in Leeds, since that provides something the smaller places can't offer.

Same in South Yorkshire with suggestions for a (better) public transport link between Barnsley and Rotherham/ Doncaster.
 

Iskra

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2014
Messages
7,938
Location
West Riding
I'm not sure about the significance of Lincoln... but the problem with all of the well intentioned West Yorkshire ideas on threads like this is that neither Bradford - Halifax - Huddersfield nor Huddersfield - Wakefield particularly trouble the capacity of a single 153 (whilst services from Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield into Leeds often run with many passengers forced to stand)... I'm sure that there must be *some* demand for Bradford - Wakefield but it's not going to be much faster than going via Leeds, and going via Leeds is where most of the demand is.

Maybe part of the problem is that Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield are broadly similar second tier places in West Yorkshire (each with their hinterlands, of course), so there's not much in one that residents of another will have a huge need for (e.g. similar mix of jobs/retail), whereas Leeds is in a whole separate tier, so there's a distinct need to leave Bradford/ Huddersfield/ Wakefield to work/shop in Leeds, since that provides something the smaller places can't offer.

Same in South Yorkshire with suggestions for a (better) public transport link between Barnsley and Rotherham/ Doncaster.

As a Leodensian who has worked at Wakefield Westgate Station and now lives in Sheffield let me tell you; it's not all about Leeds. The transport demand between the 'second tier' places is probably poor because the links between them are poor. Let's face it, rail is a poor option between them.

If you look at the well-served lines that come out of Leeds, they are also popular in the opposite direction too. Huddersfield sees a strong flow to Manchester. Wakefield does to London, Sheffield and Birmingham. Yes there is significant demand to Leeds (and of course beyond Leeds too, some of these journeys could even be between these 'second tier' places), but I think actually there is a stronger correlation that people travel by rail to where the rail links are good, because it is easier to do so! We see this in other areas too; the 'sparks effect' on the Airedale line for example, Manchester getting 3tph to London after the dawn of a decent Pendolino service. Investment in a quality service does itself drive demand to an extent.

I think if you electrified Bradford-Huddersfield-Wakefield and put shiny 3-car electric units on it with an hourly service on each route, I think you would see a significant upswing in passengers as they might be tempted away from other modes. Obviously, it's not going to happen for a multitude of reasons, many of which are valid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top