• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Travel habits after COVID-19

When COVID-19 restrictions are withdrawn, how will your use of the railway change?

  • I will use it more often

    Votes: 7 14.6%
  • I will use it, on average, the same

    Votes: 38 79.2%
  • I will use it less frequently, up to 20% less

    Votes: 3 6.3%
  • I will use it less frequently, up to 50% less

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I will use it much less frequently (between 50% less and stop using it altogether)

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    48
Status
Not open for further replies.

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
There have been lots of comments in several virus related threads hypothesising that the railways will see a significant drop in passenger demand in the medium to long term when the travel restrictions are withdrawn.

I’m genuinely interested to see whether that will be the case or not. Personally, I don’t think there will be.

So, the question is, when “this is all over”, ie when the stay at home / social distancing advice is officially withdrawn in full, do you plan to use the railways any differently than prior to the virus? This is an individual question for you, not what you think others might do. Please think about the real journeys you made up until last month, and whether you will still make similar journeys when we are in the sunny uplands of a healthy country. Assume the restrictions are off no later than September this year.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

PaulMc7

Established Member
Joined
9 Jul 2019
Messages
4,029
I know for me, I won't use the trains more as buses near me are more frequent and suit my journeys more but the way I see it is that if we get through this as quickly as possible(June/July), train journeys will be more common for people as a lot of us are already very bored indoors and desperate to go traveling and the good weather always increases that. I also think that if money isn't a major problem for people they'll still be able to afford what they do every summer travel-wise but if things go on longer then it could take a lot longer to build travel patterns back up. I think as long as people get to live 5/6 weeks of summer as they normally would travel will be in a good position to happen so train passenger numbers won't be too bad
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
39,011
Location
Yorks
Interesting piece on the BBC about this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52137968

BBC said:
The aftermath of the Covid-19 crisis will transform the way we live, work and travel in the UK, the AA says.

It predicts a permanent reduction in the demand for travel because people have learned during the crisis to use home-working technology.

The implications are profound for commuters and for government finances.

The Chancellor currently plans to spend £27bn to curb congestion on roads and £100bn on HS2 – but if demand falls, that may not be needed.

AA President Edmund King says anecdotal evidence from people lucky enough to be working during the coronavirus-enforced lockdown suggests that infrastructure funds might be better spent on broadband to support home working.

He told BBC News: "Arguably in future, we should invest more in broadband because what this current crisis has shown is that the majority of companies can continue working from home, and it can be more efficient."

But the government's former infrastructure tsar, Andrew Adonis, said it was too soon to forecast a permanent drop in traffic due to an increase in home working.

He told us: "Lots of people are working out how to use Skype and Zoom, so this could improve productivity – but on the other hand, other people can’t wait to get back to the office.

“I’m sceptical whether travel demand will drop sufficiently to counteract population growth in the UK." More people generally equals more travel.

Image copyright Getty Images
Other experts are calling for the roads programme and HS2 rail project to be put on hold for a decade so ministers can be sure they’re not wasting money.

They say if commuters spend just one day a week working from home after the crisis - or commuting later - the roads will be as empty as they are in the school holidays.

If transport infrastructure plans are scrapped or scaled down, that could also help plug the inevitable gulf in public finances caused by the virus.

Mr King continued: “It really is extraordinary. Every day is like Christmas Day since the lockdown.

"People travelling up and down motorways just to hold meetings is inefficient, expensive and not good for the environment. I think use of roads and rail and indeed bus will be reduced after this crisis."

I think there might be an increase in working from home, but nowhere near to the extent that some people think.

It also seems to be a very commuter centric view of the railway. For those calling for a large reduction in investment, it doesn't take account of those routes which struggle to cope outside of the peak hours.

Also, if people spend all their working week in the home, that's likely to prompt more of an urge for a change of scene on days off, so perhaps a shift to spending on leisure travel will be necessary.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
Results so far seem to support the view that travel habits won’t change. However the sample size is small; more votes required!
 

fishquinn

Established Member
Associate Staff
Quizmaster
Joined
4 Oct 2013
Messages
6,643
Location
Warwickshire
Results so far seem to support the view that travel habits won’t change. However the sample size is small; more votes required!
I'd suggest that a rail forum is also a highly biased (and small) sample to pick from though. I'd imagine many work on the railway or travel on trains for 'enthusiast purposes' so a better sample group would be that of a non transport related forum (or better, a random sample of people from the general populous).
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
I'd suggest that a rail forum is also a highly biased (and small) sample to pick from though. I'd imagine many work on the railway or travel on trains for 'enthusiast purposes' so a better sample group would be that of a non transport related forum (or better, a random sample of people from the general populous).

Yep, agreed. However, I still thinks it’s interesting to find out the views here.
 

scotrail158713

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2019
Messages
1,797
Location
Dundee
I can’t really see my usage changing - much like @PaulMc7 buses are more convenient for a lot of my journeys so I use trains fairly infrequently anyway.
 

Dr Day

Member
Joined
16 Oct 2018
Messages
545
Location
Bristol
Depends on the impact on the economy on whether I still have a job or not! Assuming I do, personal leisure travel will probably stay the same, but see business-related travel for meetings being reduced and replaced by video calls, along with less daily commuting.
 

hexagon789

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Sep 2016
Messages
15,791
Location
Glasgow
I can see rail travel dropping off a bit but I think car travel will return to pre-virus levels.
 

Ianno87

Veteran Member
Joined
3 May 2015
Messages
15,215
I could imagine my business use of the railway may fall slightly, with a greater push for Skype/Teams meetings (though we already did alot of that anyway).

Leisure, I fully intend to travel more than ever!

Interesting piece on the BBC about this:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-52137968



I think there might be an increase in working from home, but nowhere near to the extent that some people think.

It also seems to be a very commuter centric view of the railway. For those calling for a large reduction in investment, it doesn't take account of those routes which struggle to cope outside of the peak hours.

Also, if people spend all their working week in the home, that's likely to prompt more of an urge for a change of scene on days off, so perhaps a shift to spending on leisure travel will be necessary.

Agree - I think post-Covid 19 may strengthen the case for things like HS2, as workers shift towards longer commutes to the office once or twice a week and make use of working time on the train, rather than a short commute 5 days a week. And yes, less travel in the week giving more inclination to travel at weekends.
 

Mojo

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
7 Aug 2005
Messages
20,397
Location
0035
I’m also wondering, if along the same lines, employers will notice how much less productive their employees are when they are working from home.

One thing I’ve noticed from watching people on Webcams on TV and also from seeing other people do it is how the technology is not particularly reliable, with lots of people seemingly having IT problems. Certainly video calls seem a lot less efficient than a real meeting because of people over-speaking, time lags in videos and sound, people randomly dropping out part way through, and so on.
 

SuperNova

Member
Joined
12 Dec 2019
Messages
957
Location
The North
I think some companies that previously didn't allow home working would do so now and I think some companies will allow more flexible working hours which is good news for congestion on the roads and for peak time transport journeys.

However, I can't see a permanent switch because the reality is - the technology in place isn't up to scratch. My friends company can't securely get everyone on their VPN so are having to do it in shifts, and Zoom teleconferencing can be unreliable. You might get people doing one or two days more at work but the assumption it will drastically change is pie in the sky thinking.

Plus, I imagine after being cooped up for months - the office will be desirable to many workers!
 

smsm1

Member
Joined
3 Nov 2015
Messages
196
I’m also wondering, if along the same lines, employers will notice how much less productive their employees are when they are working from home.

One thing I’ve noticed from watching people on Webcams on TV and also from seeing other people do it is how the technology is not particularly reliable, with lots of people seemingly having IT problems. Certainly video calls seem a lot less efficient than a real meeting because of people over-speaking, time lags in videos and sound, people randomly dropping out part way through, and so on.
I think some of those issues are due to many people choosing to go for the cheapest internet connection at home, rather than one that's fast enough for the needs of video calling. The roll out of fibre to the home and stopping the sale of older, slower ADSL products should help with this aspect.

Some of the issues I've seen are in house wifi issues, some providers are starting to have products to support this, however there is an extra cost to them.

Part of the interrupting is learning a new form of ettiquete and using features in the video conferencing tools, such as being able to indicate that you'd like to talk, and having a meeting lead can help.


We're getting more used to it in our company and hoping that it'll allow more home working in the future by more people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top