We can't ignore mental health issues and we can't completely wreck the economy; there has to be a sensible end to the restrictions and it has to take into account all sorts of issues. The idea that all live should be preserved no matter what the cost, even if it means people living miserably, is flawed. I'm not sure what the maximum time we can do these restrictions is, but it won't be as long as some people want it to be, and extending it too long is going to cause so many other problems it would be counterproductive.
I can understand that some measures may need to be in place for a time, but the current measures really can't go on for much longer than the 3 weeks originally planned for. Maybe another week on top, maximum. I'm not saying things need to go fully back to normal then but there needs to be some intermediary stage before too long.
It's just not right or sensible to say that the wider picture shouldn't be looked at; in fact it's very dangerous.
You really don't understand how viruses spread do you ?
It's unclear what you are saying but the issue is that the virus is going to continue to spread; the issues are
1) we need to try to reduce the rate of spread at this moment in time; but
2) any measures to reduce the rate of spread should not ignore the bigger picture and should not make other issues so much worse as this would be counterproductive; there needs to be a limit on any measures to avoid causing too many other problems.