• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 745 Stadler FLIRTs

Status
Not open for further replies.

jopsuk

Veteran Member
Joined
13 May 2008
Messages
12,773
perhaps the new timetable will be a 4.5 hour cycle requiring 9 units.
Feeling sure that I've seen long ago that the idea will be it needs 9 diagrams- as does the full 4tph Stansted service.
90% fleet use is particularly bold with small fleets
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Alfie1014

Member
Joined
27 Jun 2012
Messages
1,126
Location
Essex
106 on 0940 LivSt Stansted Apt today. The level boarding on downside at Stortford pretty impressive. Still a bit of a gap but vast improvement on the big gap and step up/down on 379s / 317s

If I used a wheelchair I don’t think I’d want to try bridging that gap!
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,443
But Norwich is a 4 hour round trip so that will require 8 diagrams to provide a 2tph service. Without significant reliability improvements it isn't going to happen.
It's 10 diagrams, there's a half hour turnaround at each end.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,671
Location
Northern England
Only if you can produce a timetable that meets that spec. There are other services that need to fit in too. It is currently a 5 hour round trip requiring 10 diagrams, so perhaps the new timetable will be a 4.5 hour cycle requiring 9 units.
It's 10 diagrams, there's a half hour turnaround at each end.
But you see my point. In fact that's even worse. They're barely going to be able to do any maintenance during weekdays. And going by their track record they'll need all the depot time they can get
 

Astro_Orbiter

Member
Joined
8 Nov 2019
Messages
281
Location
UK
But Norwich is a 4 hour round trip so that will require 8 diagrams to provide a 2tph service. Without significant reliability improvements it isn't going to happen.
Well then it'll be 720's subbing in for Norwich/Stanex depending on which subfleet has the lack of availability. It does seem a little ambitious given the required service on both sides, maybe theres a big shake up coming with the timetable, or theyre planning on squeezing some extra time out of the turnarounds, there are likely efficiencies that can be made that will no doubt be part of the wider new fleet plans
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,266
But you see my point. In fact that's even worse. They're barely going to be able to do any maintenance during weekdays. And going by their track record they'll need all the depot time they can get
The plan is 9 diagrams. Tightening of timings which the 745s enable will allow a diagram to be saved, or that's the plan. So 9 from 10 on both fleets.
 

47421

Member
Joined
7 Feb 2012
Messages
655
Location
london
The original diagram plan was based on both WA and GE timetable recast. Was originally due May 2020. 374B5F6C-5D81-4E06-9E2D-079C1D0EDC26.jpegWA now not expected until Dec 2021 earliest, to coincide with East Coast recast as that affects KX/Thameslink - Cambridge. GE no one knows.
 

306024

Established Member
Joined
23 Jan 2013
Messages
3,946
Location
East Anglia
But you see my point. In fact that's even worse. They're barely going to be able to do any maintenance during weekdays. And going by their track record they'll need all the depot time they can get

Indeed. On paper each unit sees Crown Point every 9 days for about 6 hours max for the 745/1s, 30 hours if you replace it with the spare, assuming it is available. Ambitious it is, but no doubt there are penalty payments if Stadler can’t meet the required availability. Not that is much comfort to a first class season ticket holder on the Norwich line, if many still exist, who will likely see standard class only trains replacing the 745/0 on occasions.

The plan is 9 diagrams. Tightening of timings which the 745s enable will allow a diagram to be saved, or that's the plan. So 9 from 10 on both fleets.

Compared to today that’s a saving of one diagram on the Norwich’s. The Stansted service is the same requirement, where it is much harder to tighten the timings partly due to the single track through Stansted tunnel. Commercially it is desirable to always have a train ready to board at each end, especially at Liverpool St where you don’t want lots of suitcases clogging the concourse.
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,136
Location
Dunblane
What, the couplers unintentionally parted in service? I didn't know that was common on 379s.
He means they split up a pair of 379s to run two diagrams to replace the 745 one and keep running the original 379 diagram. Unless you're joking? in which case its customary to use an emoji or emoticon.
 

Energy

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2018
Messages
4,458
He means they split up a pair of 379s to run two diagrams to replace the 745 one and keep running the original 379 diagram. Unless you're joking? in which case its customary to use an emoji or emoticon.
The electrostars had an issue fairly recently with splitting in service, can't remember when but it was fairly recently.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,671
Location
Northern England
He means they split up a pair of 379s to run two diagrams to replace the 745 one and keep running the original 379 diagram. Unless you're joking? in which case its customary to use an emoji or emoticon.
I'm aware of that custom.

I simply misunderstood the spirit of the post: I thought what he meant was that the 745 had been subbed with a pair of 379s, which were stuck at Sawbridgeworth because they had parted in service and wouldn't couple again.
 

dk1

Veteran Member
Joined
2 Oct 2009
Messages
15,913
Location
East Anglia
He means they split up a pair of 379s to run two diagrams to replace the 745 one and keep running the original 379 diagram. Unless you're joking? in which case its customary to use an emoji or emoticon.
He means nothing of the sort. The 379s parted in service. RAIB investigations ongoing.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,671
Location
Northern England
He means nothing of the sort. The 379s parted in service. RAIB investigations ongoing.
So I am correct in my original interpretation that this is why the train was stuck at Sawbridgeworth? Because two Electrostars parted in service?

Sorry, I'm a little confused at the moment with everybody seemingly having a different idea of what's happening
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,443
So I am correct in my original interpretation that this is why the train was stuck at Sawbridgeworth? Because two Electrostars parted in service?

Sorry, I'm a little confused at the moment with everybody seemingly having a different idea of what's happening
That's how I read @dk1 post and he has just confirmed.
 

Speed43125

Member
Joined
20 Jul 2019
Messages
1,136
Location
Dunblane
He means nothing of the sort. The 379s parted in service. RAIB investigations ongoing.
So I am correct in my original interpretation that this is why the train was stuck at Sawbridgeworth? Because two Electrostars parted in service?

Sorry, I'm a little confused at the moment with everybody seemingly having a different idea of what's happening
AH. Sorry there. Completely misunderstood all that. This being the Class 745 thread completely threw me off.

Perhaps someone could set up a thread for StanEx discucion if 745/1 operations start becoming affected a lot by that.
 
Last edited:

chubs

Member
Joined
30 Oct 2012
Messages
656
AH. Sorry there. Completely misunderstood all that. This being the Class 745 thread completely threw me off.

Perhaps someone could set up a thread for StanEx discucion if 745/1 operations start becoming affected a lot by that.

We've already decided we don't need yet another thread a few pages back.
 

samuelmorris

Established Member
Joined
18 Jul 2013
Messages
5,121
Location
Brentwood, Essex
AH. Sorry there. Completely misunderstood all that. This being the Class 745 thread completely threw me off.

Perhaps someone could set up a thread for StanEx discucion if 745/1 operations start becoming affected a lot by that.
Not necessary. Someone posted an RTT link showing a StanEx service being disrupted and asked if it was a 745 at fault, and this would be a fair thread to do that in. It was not, and the real reason was then cited.
 

Railperf

Established Member
Joined
30 Oct 2017
Messages
2,941
A pair of 745s on Stansted diagrams today - 106 and 107

Looks like they ironed out the initial issues then.
Strange to be on a Stansted service holding a steady speed.

Is it my imagination or is the Roydon LC slow to clear?
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,171
A pair of 745s on Stansted diagrams today - 106 and 107

Looks like they ironed out the initial issues then.
Strange to be on a Stansted service holding a steady speed.

Is it my imagination or is the Roydon LC slow to clear?

All the crossings down there can be, as the crossing keeper controls 4 others as well - if there’s an issue at any one of them (someone slow to clear off the crossing) it will likely delay another closure sequence.
 

MrPIC

Member
Joined
30 May 2015
Messages
425
On the Stansted Express a lot of it boils down to not going at linespeed constantly. Departing Tottenham on the down road there's no point in getting up to 85 to just catch up the Hertford eg along the valley, also gives the Signaller a better chance of sorting out the crossings.
 

XCTurbostar

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2014
Messages
1,882
Okay so just quickly for us none London folk, can someone give a summary of how the roll out is going and whether 379s or 321s/755s still replace 745s in service on both routes?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top