• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Best and worst refurbished train since privatisation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
To me those seats are too high. I'm tall, but even I find that the seat is significantly higher than my head, making the interior claustrophobic

That's why I find the small headrest variant to be best - you can see through between the seats, and it's not really any less comfortable (though it looks less luxurious and more ironing board-like).

Interestingly these initially got the unkind nickname of "tombstones" in some quarters, but they quickly became popular and lost it.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,268
Interestingly these initially got the unkind nickname of "tombstones" in some quarters, but they quickly became popular and lost it.
I still call them tombstones, though it’s largely because of the way FGW arranged them with very few bays of four. Even worse I think they’ve left them in the same “Thames Valley metro” layout for the 2+4 sets in the south west.

Still can’t beat an IC70, though.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
I still call them tombstones, though it’s largely because of the way FGW arranged them with very few bays of four. Even worse I think they’ve left them in the same “Thames Valley metro” layout for the 2+4 sets in the south west.

Still can’t beat an IC70, though.
IC70 seating might have been fine in the 1970s but in the 21st Century they were out of date, uncomfortable (with fixed armrests you had to be a gymnast to squeeze into the airline seat from the aisle) and didn't meet current safety requirements.

Thankfully they were gone from the majority of HST services with the exception of the Midland Mainline ones which kept those horrible seats right up to being scrapped.

The FGW interior was far superior in everyway possible.
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
Interestingly these initially got the unkind nickname of "tombstones" in some quarters, but they quickly became popular and lost it.
Lots of people still refer to them as such, I’ve heard passengers asking why they were given tombstones to sit down in.
 

Mordac

Established Member
Joined
5 Mar 2016
Messages
2,308
Location
Birmingham
Apologies for the off-topic, but isn't "non-tilting pendolino" an oxymoron? :s
That's what I thought when I heard of them too, I guess a good UK analogy are the Class 220 and 222, built with the same tilting shells of the 221s, but without any tilting equipment?
 

Nymanic

Member
Joined
6 Jan 2014
Messages
146
Location
Manchester
That's what I thought when I heard of them too, I guess a good UK analogy are the Class 220 and 222, built with the same tilting shells of the 221s, but without any tilting equipment?
Essentially yes. The Italo Evo (ETR675) is an actual Alstom Pendolino, and so can be specified with tilting apparatus (as per the ETR600/610), but wasn't so in this case. Confusing all the same.

This and the Railjets show that the seats are certified up to 250km/h - but perhaps no faster?
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,268
IC70 seating might have been fine in the 1970s but in the 21st Century they were out of date, uncomfortable (with fixed armrests you had to be a gymnast to squeeze into the airline seat from the aisle) and didn't meet current safety requirements.
They weren't uncomfortable; quite the opposite in fact.

The FGW interior was far superior in everyway possible.
I'm afraid that's just laughable.
 

ChilternTurbo

Member
Joined
15 Jun 2016
Messages
303
They weren't uncomfortable; quite the opposite in fact.


I'm afraid that's just laughable.
I think this goes to show how subjective seat comfort is. When I used the Chiltern slam door Banbury set, I would often choose to stand rather than try than limbo into one of the vacant window seats.
I actually quite liked the mid-noughties FGW HST refurbishment in both first and standard although along with others I found the First Group colour palette not very nice. The later GWR first class refurb looked very classy in my opinion with the winged leather Primarius seats. It's a shame that these didn't last long before the IETs with their underwhelming interiors took over.
I thought the Virgin East Coast refurbishment of Mk.3s and Mk.4s was really good. The Mallard refurbishment was a good but was looking really tired by 2014. Even though it was just new carpets, seat covers and leather in first class, I thought it was very effective.
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,282
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
I think this goes to show how subjective seat comfort is. When I used the Chiltern slam door Banbury set, I would often choose to stand rather than try than limbo into one of the vacant window seats.

It certainly is. When I used the EMR Angel set last December, it was probably the first time I'd used an IC70 in a HST Vehicle since the end of the FGW Barbie Era. And I remembered why they should have stayed in the past. I'm a reasonably tall person, and I'd forgotten what it was like to stick my head against the headrest and feel the top of the seat in the back of my head. As well as the equally irritating fixed arm-rests and the table that felt like it was a foot away from your lap. Give me an FGW or ScotRail HST every time, and a second best case scenario of the ex EC HST set (the ones with the modified bases). IC70s have had their day, that's for sure. It was rather nicer to come back in the ex GW 402 buffet coach instead, both to bring back memories of travelling them in the south west, and to avoid the IC70s in standard again. The pseudo GWR GC ones weren't bad, but I can sink into the Primarius more.

Another nomination for the worst category in my opinion is the prototype GWR refurb 166205. That didn't take long to look dirty or feel tired either! (Suffered the same issue as LA15/16 for the reasons I've outlined in that post above).
 

Metrolink

Member
Joined
20 Jan 2021
Messages
165
Location
Manchester
Best:
  • Have to agree with @Bletchleyite here, those 185s look nice and are relatively comfortable for long distance stock.
  • Avanti’s 390 Pendolinos first class service due to the facilities like USB charging, tables, legroom, how private it feels.
  • I had a pleasant experience shortly before COVID-19 on a 195 so that will be added to my list.

  • Worst:
  • Northern’s 323s and 150s are awful to sit on for long-distance, especially because it feels like a bus not a train, on the Bentham and Calder Valley lines - and the 323s in general.
 

Aictos

Established Member
Joined
28 Apr 2009
Messages
10,403
They weren't uncomfortable; quite the opposite in fact.


I'm afraid that's just laughable.
Like I said they might have been comfortable in the 1970s but that was 40 years ago in much the same way that Mk1 seating might seem comfortable now but doesn't meet current safety requirements so the best place for them is the scrapyard.
To insist the that the IC70s should still be in use now that is laughable!

Seating as you have proved is subjective, personally I found the FGW interiors with the non IC70 seating to be comfortable as you don't have to be a gymnast to get in and out of the seating with the fixed armrests.

It certainly is. When I used the EMR Angel set last December, it was probably the first time I'd used an IC70 in a HST Vehicle since the end of the FGW Barbie Era. And I remembered why they should have stayed in the past. I'm a reasonably tall person, and I'd forgotten what it was like to stick my head against the headrest and feel the top of the seat in the back of my head. As well as the equally irritating fixed arm-rests and the table that felt like it was a foot away from your lap. Give me an FGW or ScotRail HST every time, and a second best case scenario of the ex EC HST set (the ones with the modified bases). IC70s have had their day, that's for sure. It was rather nicer to come back in the ex GW 402 buffet coach instead, both to bring back memories of travelling them in the south west, and to avoid the IC70s in standard again. The pseudo GWR GC ones weren't bad, but I can sink into the Primarius more.
Pretty much why I detest the IC70 seating and much prefer the more modern seating.
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
One of the better refurbishments that I had forgotten about is the GNER Mallard one (I might be wrong, but is that the basis of the XC HST refurb?).
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
One of the better refurbishments that I had forgotten about is the GNER Mallard one (I might be wrong, but is that the basis of the XC HST refurb?).

That was very classy (and yes, it's very similar to the XC HSTs), but the seats had a nasty design flaw of a single piece cushion with the base sloping the wrong way. VTEC fixed it with new, softer two piece cushions and made it very classy indeed.
 

greatvoyager

Established Member
Joined
15 Aug 2019
Messages
2,426
Location
Exeter
That was very classy (and yes, it's very similar to the XC HSTs), but the seats had a nasty design flaw of a single piece cushion with the base sloping the wrong way. VTEC fixed it with new, softer two piece cushions and made it very classy indeed.
Thanks for confirming. Was the design flaw fixed on XC HSTs too?
 

fgwrich

Established Member
Joined
15 Apr 2009
Messages
9,282
Location
Between Edinburgh and Exeter
They were the first two to be refurbished for the franchise launch. Unfortunately, the first refurbishments were not particularly successful - flat cloth being used instead of moquette etc, the sets rather looked liked they’d been thrown together in a hurry towards the end and were utterly rancid (more so compared to the much smarter and cleaner FGW refurb of a few years previous!). Thankfully, any further refurbishments went over to using closed loop moquette - also dubbed Astroturf after its use on Southern, but it’s better than the utterly awful flat cloth of the first set.

Eg.

Indeed. What does "learnt their lesson" mean? Unless he means the earlier GWR refurbishments of these sets.

Already explained. See route above and photos in post #68. The same lesson learnt from 166205 as well.
 

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,624
Location
First Class
The best must surely be the SWT CIGs and BIGs, followed by the VEPs, and then the CEPs and BEPs.... None of this slidey door nonsense thank you! :D
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
The best must surely be the SWT CIGs and BIGs, followed by the VEPs, and then the CEPs and BEPs.... None of this slidey door nonsense thank you! :D
We're talking refurbishments. None of those were refurbished after privatisation.

They were terrible anyway.
 

Journeyman

Established Member
Joined
16 Apr 2014
Messages
6,295
Define refurbishment?

I liked pretty much everything about them!
As the thread title says - best and worst post-privatisation refurbishment. None of them were refurbished after privatisation. SWT did re-cover some seats, but I'm not sure that counts. Connex generally just let theirs rot.
 

DustyBin

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2020
Messages
3,624
Location
First Class
As the thread title says - best and worst post-privatisation refurbishment. None of them were refurbished after privatisation. SWT did re-cover some seats, but I'm not sure that counts. Connex generally just let theirs rot.

I would count the SWT effort as a refurbishment, albeit a light one. A refurb doesn’t need to involve wholesale replacement of seats, changes to layouts etc., not for me anyway. I’m pretty sure all of their slam door units received similar treatment incidentally.

Edited to add: Agreed in regard to Connex!
 

mightyena

Member
Joined
13 Aug 2011
Messages
51
It certainly is. When I used the EMR Angel set last December, it was probably the first time I'd used an IC70 in a HST Vehicle since the end of the FGW Barbie Era. And I remembered why they should have stayed in the past. I'm a reasonably tall person, and I'd forgotten what it was like to stick my head against the headrest and feel the top of the seat in the back of my head. As well as the equally irritating fixed arm-rests and the table that felt like it was a foot away from your lap. Give me an FGW or ScotRail HST every time, and a second best case scenario of the ex EC HST set (the ones with the modified bases). IC70s have had their day, that's for sure. It was rather nicer to come back in the ex GW 402 buffet coach instead, both to bring back memories of travelling them in the south west, and to avoid the IC70s in standard again. The pseudo GWR GC ones weren't bad, but I can sink into the Primarius more.

Another nomination for the worst category in my opinion is the prototype GWR refurb 166205. That didn't take long to look dirty or feel tired either! (Suffered the same issue as LA15/16 for the reasons I've outlined in that post above).
Quite. Chiltern's Mk3 refurbishment was excellent apart from the retaining of IC70s, which took it from "fantastic" to "Avoid, if at all possible" in one fell swoop.

In the spirit of the "Ironing Boards", I've taken to calling IC70s "deckchairs", since their seating position is somewhat similar. I'm not even that tall (I'm pretty much exactly the average height for the UK) and I have the same problem you do, combined with the fact that they make the small of my back start to hurt after about 20 minutes in one.

I'd honestly rather do a journey on a 700-style ironing board than an IC70. Ironing boards are just a bit uncomfortable. IC70s actually hurt me to sit in for long periods.
 

yorksrob

Veteran Member
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Messages
38,957
Location
Yorks
The best must surely be the SWT CIGs and BIGs, followed by the VEPs, and then the CEPs and BEPs.... None of this slidey door nonsense thank you! :D

Agree completely. The SWT refurb was more of a facelift, however it worked very well and their units were well kept to the end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top