anthony263
Established Member
I think we can count ourselves lucky we haven't had any especially when you look at the damage to the Swr unit.
My stomach lurched when I saw it come up on BBC news. Thoughts with all the train crew
-
Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!
Collision and derailment near Salisbury (Fisherton Tunnel) 31/10/21
- Thread starter Monty
- Start date
My stomach lurched when I saw it come up on BBC news. Thoughts with all the train crew
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R
RailUK Forums
Bletchleyite
Veteran Member
It doesn't strike me as a hugely difficult IT problem (if built as an added failsafe on top), but the question would be more whether UK track circuit block signalling is built that way or not?
Can I just say that I think it's sickening that there's some railway/emergency services worker getting their rocks off at sharing images from the scene.
The BBC have got hold of 2 pictures from inside the tunnel
Salisbury train crash: Major incident as two trains collide
It is thought about 17 people are injured and a train driver was trapped.
www.bbc.co.uk
Or evacuated passengers? There’s allegedly a video on tiktok inside a carriage according to a Facebook comment I’ve just scrolled past!
anthony263
Established Member
They just broadcast a video of one of the trains outside the tunnel. The units headlights switching on and offThe BBC have got hold of 2 pictures from inside the tunnel
Salisbury train crash: Major incident as two trains collide
It is thought about 17 people are injured and a train driver was trapped.www.bbc.co.uk
Strathclyder
Established Member
Agreed. Best not to let this thread be a repeat of the Carmont one in this respect.
It could just be a passenger that was on the train, 99% of them will have a camera on their phone.
There's always going to be something on TikTok! People involved in any incident these days will want to let as many people as they can know, and hope it will go viral. Sad but true.
It appears so, I've seen an image that appears to be from a video of the inside of one of the units, which has a Tik Tok watermark. I won't be sharing it for obvious reasons.
bramling
Veteran Member
As a point of order, two passenger trains were involved, which by definition would have been carrying passengers. Nowadays pretty much everyone has a camera phone and the ability to share images instantly.
It could be I suppose, but that PlaneTrainHub chap on Twitter has said he got them from a railway source.
Nova1
Member
londonboi198o5
On Moderation
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 449
Those will be the headlights switched to hazzard to warn other trains
Probably got hazard mode switched on, which flashes them similar to the indicators on a car.
357
Established Member
- Joined
- 12 Nov 2018
- Messages
- 1,368
Hazard lights are a common feature on newer lighting units. Any train coming the other way should apply the emergency brake and contact the signaller immediately.
Mod note: Please keep speculation to a minimum here - particularly as this incident is being reported in the mainstream media, we need to ensure speculation posted here isn't picked up and reported as fact. Additionally, this is a fast-moving thread and thus the forum team can't keep on top of all posts in real-time. If you see anything that concerns you, please use the Report functionality.
Surreytraveller
On Moderation
- Joined
- 21 Oct 2009
- Messages
- 2,810
Indeed. That's what WhatsApp is for. Far more information on that than official sources
westcoaster
Established Member
I'm a bit confused, has that GWR unit split in half.
londonboi198o5
On Moderation
- Joined
- 28 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 449
it wouldnt be a rear cab the train is travelling on the left hand rail which is the rails it would be driving on in the direction. Just a thought.
RPI
Established Member
- Joined
- 6 Dec 2010
- Messages
- 2,751
Thats what I was thinking, the image show in the tunnel makes no sense
Broken70
Member
The unit in the photo in post #134 could be 1F27?
Gloster
Established Member
Signals should have batteries which would keep them lit if mains power is lost and the signal protecting the junction certainly did in 1980. If there are any problems, then they should go to red. I am not going to speculate further on something that is very odd.
David Stewart
New Member
- Joined
- 7 Oct 2017
- Messages
- 4
Sorry this is speculation but
Moderator note: This is not the case; it is a fixed diamond
Yes I was wondering that. Sorry for the speculation but I was wondering if the diamond crossing is a switched diamond then its possible that the second train was diverted onto the other line.
Moderator note: This is not the case; it is a fixed diamond
Last edited by a moderator:
It is possible and newer systems than that at Salisbury (the control system rather than the interlocking as I understand it) detect a track circuit occupying or clearing out of sequence. I don't know whether it puts signals back to danger though.
I'm assuming the driver should treat it as a red if the signal has lost power completely and is not lighting.
do they have any reflective stuff on them to help a driver see a unit signal. maybe the number plate?