• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

MML Electrification: progress updates

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
734
There not bothered DfT just pay their bills.
It's stupid, also EMR has spent money on nice shiny new staff uniforms but dirty filthy trains with 222s always dirty outside with steamy windows. I seen the oddball 222104 earlier with the different colour coach now it's had an extra coach, so messy and lazy not to paint that coach. Back on topic I'm glad progress with electrication is going well.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

KB59

Member
Joined
12 Apr 2019
Messages
13
Has Market Harborough’s useful pedestrian tunnel from the main entrance to the up platform been retained, or have we got to make a dogleg walk & climb via the new footbridge?
Tunnel still in place for those able bodied.
 

Kneedown

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2007
Messages
1,768
Location
Nottinghamshire
It's stupid, also EMR has spent money on nice shiny new staff uniforms but dirty filthy trains with 222s always dirty outside with steamy windows.
To be fair, the uniforms are long overdue. The old ones were literally falling apart and replacements exceedingly thin on the ground. I was down to three useable shirts and one pair of trousers.
Apologies for the OT reply.
 

DannyMich2018

Member
Joined
19 Dec 2018
Messages
734
To be fair, the uniforms are long overdue. The old ones were literally falling apart and replacements exceedingly thin on the ground. I was down to three useable shirts and one pair of trousers.
Apologies for the OT reply.
Yes that's okay. Let's hope trains improve now. Had my first journey for more than 10 years to Wellingborough. How different the station looks now after electrification.
 

Cowley

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Global Moderator
Joined
15 Apr 2016
Messages
15,766
Location
Devon
Let’s try and steer this back onto the subject of MML electrification updates before we go too far down the route of uniforms/where else needs electrifying etc…

Thanks everyone. ;)
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,489
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
Anyone know if Jubilee weekend is being used to do any electrification work or is it a total celebration and everyone is off?
There's plenty of work going on on midweek nights this week.
Over at Rushton, looks like work's complete to put up the masts heading west from O/B 42 to beyond U/B 41...
Earth Wire brackets have started to appear now.
 

adamedwards

Member
Joined
4 Apr 2016
Messages
796
This may already have been reported so apologies if duplicating.

There is now a row of 4 (?) extra tall masts on the west side of the MML at Napsbury opposite the new feeder station under construction. I am assuming designed to take the feeders over the existing traction wires and into mast mounted kit on for the fast lines.
 

Edvid

Established Member
Joined
7 Feb 2008
Messages
1,323
Yes, that sounds about right. Though I should add Napsbury is a sectioning site and not a feeder station (the latter requires a National Grid or DNO connection, like the under-construction facility at Braybrooke).
 

John Webb

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2010
Messages
3,066
Location
St Albans
This may already have been reported so apologies if duplicating.

There is now a row of 4 (?) extra tall masts on the west side of the MML at Napsbury opposite the new feeder station under construction. I am assuming designed to take the feeders over the existing traction wires and into mast mounted kit on for the fast lines.
Masts not visible when I passed yesterday due to tree growth between Napsbury Lane and the railway line. Will try later in week to get photo. Probably explains why there were two road-rail platforms and road-rail crane parked outside St Albans South box during part of the past week and which had disappeared by Sunday afternoon.
 

bnc2018

Member
Joined
14 May 2021
Messages
21
Location
Banbury, Oxfordshire
Not sure how much of this is already known, but New Civil Engineer have an article on a market engagement briefing next month. The event page says
Part of the electrification programme has already been procured and is ’in delivery’ comprising electrification between Kettering and South Wigston.
The next stage of procurement for the Midland Main Line Electrification programme is split into the following route sections:
• Route Section 2 (RS2) – Wigston South to Syston 19.5km

• Route Section 3 (RS3) – Syston to Trent Junction 28.7km

• Route Section 4 (RS4) – Sheet Stores Junction to Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) 15.7km

• Route Section 5 (RS5) – Trent Junction to Nottingham 13.1km

• Route Section 6 (RS6) – Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) to Toadmoor Tunnel 16.7km

• Route Section 7 (RS7) – Toadmoor Tunnel to London Road 43.3km

• Route Section 8 (RS8) – London Road to Sheffield North 2.5km
Article:
Event:
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,096
Location
Surrey
Wow -that is major.
Depends if its one route section a year or the whole lot. So thry report section upto Syston Jcn now in delivery Shapps has yet to claim "he's getting on with electrifying the MML" by formally announcing this section unless ive missed it.
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,335
Location
Bristol
I think the trend is just to quietly do it - I know that goes against the grain for politicians
I think the politicians are now equally concerned about the bad publicity that comes from making big promises and then failing to deliver as they are about the good publicity that comes from a press event. When the big switch-on comes for Harborough though I wouldn't be surprised to see a minister turn up and cut the ribbon.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,096
Location
Surrey
I think the politicians are now equally concerned about the bad publicity that comes from making big promises and then failing to deliver as they are about the good publicity that comes from a press event. When the big switch-on comes for Harborough though I wouldn't be surprised to see a minister turn up and cut the ribbon.
I don't know if the 810's aren't running would be an embarrassment which is why they've bought themselves extra time by making this section now Kettering to Syston Jcn Wigston |Jcn
 
Last edited:

Nottingham59

Established Member
Joined
10 Dec 2019
Messages
1,640
Location
Nottingham
The current "in delivery" section is Kettering to Wigston Jct. Going on to Syston would include Leicester Station, which I think is in the next stage of procurement, as "Route Section 2"

EDIT: See post #5169 for more details
 
Last edited:

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,870
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
I think the politicians are now equally concerned about the bad publicity that comes from making big promises and then failing to deliver as they are about the good publicity that comes from a press event. When the big switch-on comes for Harborough though I wouldn't be surprised to see a minister turn up and cut the ribbon.
Exactly +1
 

Mikey C

Established Member
Joined
11 Feb 2013
Messages
6,845
Has the section from MH to Wigston South actually been announced yet? We're past the local elections etc

Either way it's good news. The cynic in me suspects that the government are desperate to get this progressing quickly with "spades in the ground" before the next election, to shore up some of their Northern seats
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,870
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
Has the section from MH to Wigston South actually been announced yet? We're past the local elections etc
As far as I am aware, no politician or DfT has announced it, but it has been on Twitter feeds, railway press, LinkedIn and New Civil Engineer.

As I say, it seems the trend is just to get on with it without big fanfare and announcements.
 
Joined
24 Jun 2014
Messages
432
Location
Derby
A similar report to the New Civil Engineer one has been published today on the RTM website, the main difference being that it suggests that the outstanding work will cost £1bn.

Another main difference between the two reports is that the civil engineering one's head illustration is of British OHL, the RTM one is of OHL in some far flung foreign land!
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,870
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
So to clarify:

Route Section 1 (RS1) - Kettering-MH-Wigston South ( in delivery)

Route Section 2 (RS2) – Wigston South to Syston 19.5km

Route Section 3 (RS3) – Syston to Trent Junction 28.7km

(Bolding mine but am I overthinking this? There seems to be a bit missing here)

Route Section 4 (RS4) – Sheet Stores Junction to Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) 15.7km

Route Section 5 (RS5) – Trent Junction to Nottingham 13.1km

Route Section 6 (RS6) – Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) to Toadmoor Tunnel 16.7km

Route Section 7 (RS7) – Toadmoor Tunnel to London Road 43.3km

Route Section 8 (RS8) – London Road to Sheffield North 2.5km
 
Last edited:
Joined
24 Jun 2014
Messages
432
Location
Derby
So to clarify:

Route Section 1 (RS1) - Kettering-MH-Wigston South

Route Section 2 (RS2) – Wigston South to Syston 19.5km

Route Section 3 (RS3) – Syston to Trent Junction 28.7km

(Bolding mine but am I overthinking this? There seems to be a bit missing here)

Route Section 4 (RS4) – Sheet Stores Junction to Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) 15.7km

Route Section 5 (RS5) – Trent Junction to Nottingham 13.1km

Route Section 6 (RS6) – Chaddesden Sidings (Derby) to Toadmoor Tunnel 16.7km

Route Section 7 (RS7) – Toadmoor Tunnel to London Road 43.3km

Route Section 8 (RS8) – London Road to Sheffield North 2.5km
Correct - two sides of the Trent triangle (only the East Midlands Parkway - Nottingham side is mentioned above)
 

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,335
Location
Bristol
I'm not sure if that isn't a semantics thing, as 'Trent Junction' no longer exists, there being Trent South and Trent East Junctions. There's 2 possible scenarios to me: 1. NCE have fudged it slightly and Trent South Jn to Sheet Stores is included, no idea if Sheet Stores to Trent East would be too for ECS moves, or 2. There exist plans for a large-scale remodelling of the Trent Jns/Sheet Stores area and so a section has been omitted whilst further work is carried out.

Somebody may be able to add the various KMs up and work out how it all reckons against the MML mileages.
 

Top