• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

GTR passengers numbers

Status
Not open for further replies.

andystock22

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
124
Just received an email from my MP regarding GTR:

"Passenger numbers are still at only 74% of pre-covid levels"

No where near this 90% figure that I've seen quoted in the media over the past few days.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

zwk500

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
13,393
Location
Bristol
The numbers will vary depending on the length of samples, time of day, day of week, time in the year etc.
Also raw numbers do not tell the whole story. People's journeys have changed, and with that so has the revenue picture.
 

GordonT

Member
Joined
26 May 2018
Messages
493
Just received an email from my MP regarding GTR:

"Passenger numbers are still at only 74% of pre-covid levels"

No where near this 90% figure that I've seen quoted in the media over the past few days.
No surprise that GTR's turf will have significant numbers of employees now tooled up for home working for at least part of their week?
 

Peregrine 4903

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
1,456
Location
London
Just received an email from my MP regarding GTR:

"Passenger numbers are still at only 74% of pre-covid levels"

No where near this 90% figure that I've seen quoted in the media over the past few days.
90% was encompassing all TOC's, not specifically GTR.
 

skyhigh

Established Member
Joined
14 Sep 2014
Messages
5,324
No where near this 90% figure that I've seen quoted in the media over the past few days.
I haven't seen these figures, but if it's a countrywide figure an average of 90% doesn't necessarily mean that GTR can't be at 74%. Given commuting seems to be down that seems fairly reasonable to me.
 

ScotGG

Established Member
Joined
3 Apr 2013
Messages
1,375
Also I wouldn't have too much faith in the MPs reply. Is that 74 percent from a month ago or the end of May? Who told them that? The DFT who want to show their cuts are justified?
 

Jorge Da Silva

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2018
Messages
2,592
Location
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
Just received an email from my MP regarding GTR:

"Passenger numbers are still at only 74% of pre-covid levels"

No where near this 90% figure that I've seen quoted in the media over the past few days.


90% is the overall number across the industry

So actually they arent wrong, its just that some operators are above the 90% figure (like LNER) and other operates (GTR and GA) are below it. The average is 90% but some particularly where commuting was a big part are 20-30% lower than the 90% where as some are above it (particularly where it is leisure driven)
 

paulmch

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
97
Given that GTR were the largest TOC by passenger numbers before Covid, would it be reasonable to assume that if they're 15 percentage points below the national average that there will be some TOCs that have already passed through the 100% mark?
 

paulmch

Member
Joined
20 Dec 2018
Messages
97
LNER is one of them thats has surpassed pre-pandemic levels
They've certainly done a very good job over the last few years. Surely there has to be some more TOCs over a hundred to make the GTR 75%/national average 90% figure viable though? LNER's pre-pandemic passenger numbers were a fraction of what GTR were carrying.
 

Jorge Da Silva

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2018
Messages
2,592
Location
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
They've certainly done a very good job over the last few years. Surely there has to be some more TOCs over a hundred to make the GTR 75%/national average 90% figure viable though? LNER's pre-pandemic passenger numbers were a fraction of what GTR were carrying.

Yeah many long distance operators are well above pre-pandemic levels or operators which are leisure based markets.
 

andystock22

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
124
Also I wouldn't have too much faith in the MPs reply. Is that 74 percent from a month ago or the end of May? Who told them that? The DFT who want to show their cuts are justified?

The email included an email directly from GTR.
 

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
For clarity, the average is NOT 90%.

The average for May was in the high 70s.
 

Jorge Da Silva

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2018
Messages
2,592
Location
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
For clarity, the average is NOT 90%.

The average for May was in the high 70s.

basically before Bank holiday week it was 90% for the last 4-5 days according the DfT, but i except the average for the whole of May is around 80ish percent but its definetley now firmly in the high 80s between 85-93% in recent weeks according to DfT

Just did the average for May, and it was 84%
 
Last edited:
Joined
18 Apr 2009
Messages
193
Location
South East
Is it true that it's the middle-distance commuters who have been the slowest to come back? (I often see this assertion bandied about, without any real backup.) In the south east for example, has travel from zones 2-6 into central London recovered more quickly than from stations just outside Greater London? If it's the middle-distance commuters (who pay more than the shorter-distance commuters) who are dragging the average down, this will have more an impact on finances than the headline figures would suggest...
 

Jorge Da Silva

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2018
Messages
2,592
Location
Cleethorpes, North East Lincolnshire
Is it true that it's the middle-distance commuters who have been the slowest to come back? (I often see this assertion bandied about, without any real backup.) In the south east for example, has travel from zones 2-6 into central London recovered more quickly than from stations just outside Greater London? If it's the middle-distance commuters (who pay more than the shorter-distance commuters) who are dragging the average down, this will have more an impact on finances than the headline figures would suggest...

Revenue is behind I think because business travellers are very slow to recover. Not sure about middle distance commuters
 

paul1609

Established Member
Joined
28 Jan 2006
Messages
7,245
Location
Wittersham Kent
Given that GTR were the largest TOC by passenger numbers before Covid, would it be reasonable to assume that if they're 15 percentage points below the national average that there will be some TOCs that have already passed through the 100% mark?
GTR before Covid depending on how you measured it were something like LNER + AWC + 1/2 GWR.
LNER were (just) smaller than Southeastern which was the smallest of the SR dc tocs.

Is it true that it's the middle-distance commuters who have been the slowest to come back? (I often see this assertion bandied about, without any real backup.) In the south east for example, has travel from zones 2-6 into central London recovered more quickly than from stations just outside Greater London? If it's the middle-distance commuters (who pay more than the shorter-distance commuters) who are dragging the average down, this will have more an impact on finances than the headline figures would suggest...
From what I've seen in the Southeast the boundary is further out probably the first station outside the M25. HS1 and the Brighton Main Line have recovered well. Some of the others are basically ghost train lines.
Theres some oddities too the Eastern End of Marshlink from Rye to Ashford is the busiest I've ever seen it. I think the commuting to London has all but gone but incoming leisure traffic day trippers and stay cation particularly at the lower end of the market pontins/caravan parks/camping to Camber/ Romney have gone through the roof to the extent that the 4 cars 171s taken from Uckfield line since covid are now full and standing.
 
Last edited:

Bald Rick

Veteran Member
Joined
28 Sep 2010
Messages
29,209
basically before Bank holiday week it was 90% for the last 4-5 days according the DfT,

but that was comparing 2019, which was a BH week and depressed numbers, with 2022, which wasn’t.

May wasn‘t 84%. You can’t average the numbers on the DfT website due to different loadings on each.

Revenue is behind I think because business travellers are very slow to recover. Not sure about middle distance commuters

commuting from outside London into London is less than half of 2019.
 
Joined
18 Apr 2009
Messages
193
Location
South East
commuting from outside London into London is less than half of 2019.

Thanks Bald Rick, that's what I have heard too. Just to be clear, when you say "outside London", do you mean outside "Greater London" and/or outside the the travelcard zones? Has zone 2-5 to central London travel generally recovered more?
 

andystock22

Member
Joined
27 Dec 2013
Messages
124
On Monday evening at around 18:00 (tube strike day) I saw an Moorgate to Welwyn Garden City train between New Barnet (Zone 5) and Hadley Wood (zone 6) and the train was next to empty. Only 3 or 4 people in each carriage. It felt like we were back in Lockdown again!

I appreciate it was on a tube strike day and many commuters decided to work from home.

No surprise that GTR's turf will have significant numbers of employees now tooled up for home working for at least part of their week?

I expect this is the case, especially on the Great Northern metro routes which call at Old Street (tech sector) and Moorgate (financial services / legal sectors).
 

MikeWM

Established Member
Joined
26 Mar 2010
Messages
4,411
Location
Ely
Anecdotal and only covering a very small part of GTR's network, but my observations would be:

- Weekends are entirely back to normal on the London-Cambridge-Ely-Kings Lynn trains.

- My 'usual' morning late-commute train is probably seeing a similar number of passengers getting on at Ely as 2019, maybe a bit less. It's a little hard to tell as it is 8 carriages (up from 4) and starts from Ely rather than back at Kings Lynn.

- The 1739 Kings Cross-Kings Lynn usually looks rather cosy at 8 carriages now. It probably needs to go back to being 12 as far as Cambridge. Between Cambridge and Ely it probably has similar loads to 2019 (though also not 100% easy to tell - it used to split at Cambridge into an incredibly busy 4-car for Kings Lynn and an almost empty 8 car that terminated at Ely, but the overall numbers do appear similar).

- Cambridge North is seeing a *lot* more passengers board southbound/alight northbound than pre-2020, both on weekdays and weekends. It appears to have really taken off for leisure travellers, rather more so than commuters.

On an average week I'd have made 5 commuting round trips Ely-Cambridge and 1 leisure round trip Ely-London. Now it is probably 3 and 1, so 67% in terms of journeys made.
 

JonathanH

Veteran Member
Joined
29 May 2011
Messages
18,808
The 1739 Kings Cross-Kings Lynn usually looks rather cosy at 8 carriages now. It probably needs to go back to being 12 as far as Cambridge.
I'd imagine that GTR's seemingly long-term fleet plan for 35 units will be set up for there not to be any scope for trains to run with 12 car formations.

I wonder whether passengers will look at other options or continue to put up with the crowding. Removing the Letchworth and Royston stops might be the first step but that begs the question as to where those passengers go.
 

Nicholas Lewis

Established Member
Joined
9 Aug 2019
Messages
6,121
Location
Surrey
The real issue for the likes of GTR is season ticket revenue is sub 50% on many routes with increased use of trains after 9.30 off peak fare threshold supporting the increase in numbers of people using the trains but the revenue/passenger is lower. The other thing im seeing in the evening is how much busier the trains are into mid evening now compared to pre covid. How the industry squares the circle of reduced season ticket to its fixed cost base is yet to be fixed unless DfT is going to accept more support will be required for the foreseeable future.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top