ACE1888
Member
Tripe
I remember now.It was a quiz show with 15 contestants who were asked one question at a time (they basically went around in a semi-circle). They had three lives and lost one for every incorrect answer, but gained one back after three correct answers. Last man standing won. I think what I have just typed is correct. It was the boss in the early 2000s though. I do remember the questions being really tough though, maybe Mastermind level.
What was 15-to-1? I do distinctly remember watching a gameshow many years ago that I loved.
It has given us some good musicians, like Cher Lloyd.
Waste of time, have not watched it and won't be either. I have better things to do with my time, even watching paint dry when decorating.
I think its outgrown it's use and those judges who we picked for the others, how long have the girls been in music exactly ?
It has given us some good musicians, like Cher Lloyd.
It has given us some good musicians, like Cher Lloyd.
My favorite to win this year is Janet Devlin. She is fantastic!
Never heard of the TV channel Challenge it is devoted purely to gameshows including the Crystal Maze and Takeshi's Castle! (Freeview Channel 46).Bring back Richard O'Brian and Crystal Maze
....But then again I don't suppose for one minute I am in ITVs target audience !!
....It has given us some good musicians, like Cher Lloyd....
smoking something illegal last winter mate? she was truly terrible.
My definition of musician seems to be somewhat different to yours. A musician plays a musical instrument (even a triangle would count), but, whilst Cher Lloyd is certainly an instrument for the 'music industry' to extract hard earned from the dim-witted in society, that popularity contest pretends to be a singing competition.
If it follows the rules for popularity contests generally, they will have put through some good singers (about 2/3) and some not so good (about 1/3), even if they could have had 100% good singers. In the first few weeks half the 'good' contestants are 'voted out' before they start on the less good ones. The winner will be the one who gets to the final few (maybe 5 or 6), but has the least chance of getting a recording contract (infact they will all be signed up and have records out in a few months).
Oh, was the big twist this year something to do with voting out more than one person in week one? (about 12 weeks to Christmas and 15 finalists(?) means something like that had to happen).
I'm surprised the Big Brother/Lost effect hasn't kicked in yet. You know, you watch one series and it's okay, so you start watching the second, but you aren't bothered if you miss some, series three you barely watch and after that you really don't know if they did a fourth series or not.
....It is no accident that RATM got Christmas number one in 2009....
Are you over 16?
Do you have a brain?
If you answered yes to both these questions, you are not the target audience.
My definition of musician seems to be somewhat different to yours. A musician plays a musical instrument (even a triangle would count), but, whilst Cher Lloyd is certainly an instrument for the 'music industry' to extract hard earned from the dim-witted in society, that popularity contest pretends to be a singing competition.
If it follows the rules for popularity contests generally, they will have put through some good singers (about 2/3) and some not so good (about 1/3), even if they could have had 100% good singers. In the first few weeks half the 'good' contestants are 'voted out' before they start on the less good ones. The winner will be the one who gets to the final few (maybe 5 or 6), but has the least chance of getting a recording contract (infact they will all be signed up and have records out in a few months).
Oh, was the big twist this year something to do with voting out more than one person in week one? (about 12 weeks to Christmas and 15 finalists(?) means something like that had to happen).
I'm surprised the Big Brother/Lost effect hasn't kicked in yet. You know, you watch one series and it's okay, so you start watching the second, but you aren't bothered if you miss some, series three you barely watch and after that you really don't know if they did a fourth series or not.
I answered yes to the first but no to the second; nor am I the target audience they may think I am but they have utterly failed.Are you over 16?
Do you have a brain?
If you answered yes to both these questions, you are not the target audience.
I actualy thought she was realy good.
Either way she is better than One Direction. The one hit wonders
With a couple of exceptions, when record contracts are signed after the series, the winner is soon forgotten - usually after just one or two singles
You're all forgetting Cher Lloyd IS a cheryl Cole look a likeeee.....Which will please Heinz immensley if i'm not mistaken....
You are the forum CC fan are you not Heinz??
So true, Matt Cardle who won the last series has literaly only just started doing anythig. A whole year after he won. Rebecca Fergerson who came 2nd (The runner up usualy gets a record contract, and to my understanding she did get one) we havn't heard hide nor hair of her. Incidentaly, the most successful contestant from last years contest seems to be Cher, and she came 4th! She has now released two singles, one of which stormed straight to number one. Before the winner has actualy done anything
Amply illustrates what a farce the whole tortured, boring, laboured excuse for entertainment it is!
I answered yes to the first but no to the second; nor am I the target audience they may think I am but they have utterly failed.