• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 323 issues - the Reprise!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Having travelled years ago on a 323 on the Birmingham Cross City line, they are very good trains and if they were 3rd rail capable I would ask if they could replace the Class 458's on the local Reading - London Waterloo route. I think if you were given the choice between a Class 313, 458 or 323, you would pick the 323 any day of the week.
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Having travelled years ago on a 323 on the Birmingham Cross City line, they are very good trains and if they were 3rd rail capable I would ask if they could replace the Class 458's on the local Reading - London Waterloo route. I think if you were given the choice between a Class 313, 458 or 323, you would pick the 323 any day of the week.

I wouldn't. 458s may not be anything special but - the hideously loud door alarm sounds aside - there's nothing wrong with them in my perspective. The Waterloo to Reading route can keep them (and the 450s before anyone suggests as much).

As for 313s? They're better than 323s in my opinion (which I know isn't valued in this thread but oh well :roll:), but not much else.
 

gnolife

Established Member
Joined
4 Nov 2010
Messages
2,028
Location
Johnstone
The 444s and 450s come a close 2nd on traction noise though...

[youtube]osG8r2tEGWg[/youtube]

Based on that video (having never heard a 444 or 450 depart from the outside - I couldn't hear it when I was on the inside of either of them), the 450 has a pretty good traction noise, and the acceleration of them seems pretty damn good as well.
 

60163

Member
Joined
11 Jan 2011
Messages
515
Location
All around Sloane Square
323s are my local branch line, love them.

Toilets ain't amazing (they're just toilets), floor sometimes has bubbles underneath (!), but very zippy, smooth, ideal for 30-min trips. Great acelleration too.
 

Nym

Established Member
Joined
2 Mar 2007
Messages
9,163
Location
Somewhere, not in London
Based on that video (having never heard a 444 or 450 depart from the outside - I couldn't hear it when I was on the inside of either of them), the 450 has a pretty good traction noise, and the acceleration of them seems pretty damn good as well.

That is the next evolution of the GTO Thyristor systems used in the 323s and Networkers, but it does not use GTOs, uses IGBTs IIRC, the Alstom system just squals.
 

NXEA!

Member
Joined
22 Oct 2009
Messages
482
The 444s and 450s come a close 2nd on traction noise though...

[youtube]osG8r2tEGWg[/youtube]
They do sound good, but I don't care what anyone says, the best Traction Motor scream of any EMU's is the Class 319! Absolute monsters. Followed by 317's and 321/322's, and the EE507 Traction Motor as fitted to the 411 Cep's, 421 Cig's and 423 Vep's. :D
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
They do sound good, but I don't care what anyone says, the best Traction Motor scream of any EMU's is the Class 319! Absolute monsters. Followed by 317's and 321/322's :D

At least those things sound like an EMU should, unlike 323s. Not much else is interesting about them though - I'm not particularly keen on them either.

Come to think of it, I'm not keen on anything between 313 and 323 inclusive. Or their third rail equivalents.
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,253
Location
Yorkshire
I'm afraid I again can't agree with you Ivo :P

The 323's are brilliant little units, even the unrefreshed Northern ones. I got something of a shock to find the loos on board had running HOT water onboard :shock:

The refresh of the Northern units is a definite marked improvement and they look rather smart. Just don't let Lampshade anywhere near them else there may not be any seat handles left <D
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
I can't get away from you lot saying 323s are good can I? I've just received a PM (replying to something else I sent) saying they are good units :roll:
 

Crossover

Established Member
Joined
4 Jun 2009
Messages
9,253
Location
Yorkshire
I can't get away from you lot saying 323s are good can I? I've just received a PM (replying to something else I sent) saying they are good units :roll:

Nope :D

After your reminder, I have partly updated my signature too...the rest is to follow :P
 

Turbostar

Member
Joined
15 Aug 2006
Messages
1,039
Location
Plymouth, Devon
Are you for real Ivo, or are you just on a complain streak??? More to the point, is there any real benefit of this thread, only just for you to have a rant about trains you dislike???
 

RobShipway

Established Member
Joined
20 Sep 2009
Messages
3,337
Are you for real Ivo, or are you just on a complain streak??? More to the point, is there any real benefit of this thread, only just for you to have a rant about trains you dislike???

We all have our points of view on the different types pf train and this should be accepted as should Ivo having a different point of view from most of us in this forum.
 

swt_passenger

Veteran Member
Joined
7 Apr 2010
Messages
31,382
We all have our points of view on the different types pf train and this should be accepted as should Ivo having a different point of view from most of us in this forum.

Did you read the first post thoroughly?

It isn't a point of view, it's a total rant without any justification - and Ivo explicitly invited any criticism he's getting within that post anyway...
 

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
Isn't half of the point of discussion forums to encourage debate?

I know I am in the minority but I absolutely abhor the things and wish to discuss this (as was done some time ago; note the lack of long-term lack of journeys I had had until Saturday). If those who disagree feel the need to respond, let them do so also.

Oh, and given the day I should be allowed a rant. I've deliberately avoided complaining about it being Valentine's Day so this will do instead.
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,576
Location
Glasgow
All I can say is the 323s are excellent by Northern 'West' standards. I don't want to start the Pacer wars here but as a Pacer commuter and I think they are great compared to the downright dinginess and sluggishness of a 142's acceleration, interior and general quality. Perhaps it's different for those who see 142s with 'bus seats' as a novelty.

The interiors may not be luxurious, but it would be inappropriate for them to be so. Maybe you are associating them with the Cross City line or something?
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
The doors. The floor. The walls. The seats. The toilets. The capacity. The lack of tables. The stupid noises. The speed. The interior layout. The... well, everything! Isn't ten a sufficient number?
.

Doors seem fine to me. Walls are not objectionable. Seats are much better than anything provided by an ex-FNW or Merseytravel 142. Toilets are OK - better than this on a Pacer. Most local stock on Northern at least doesn't have tables - none on 142/144/150/153/155/333/332. Noises are unique (reminds me of the LU '96 stock - do you loathe that too?). 90mph is good. Layout far better than most Northern 'West' Pacers.

Since you mentioned them being much worse than Pacers, I have tried to compare them.
 
Last edited:

Ivo

Established Member
Joined
8 Jan 2010
Messages
7,307
Location
Bath (or Southend)
The interiors may not be luxurious, but it would be inappropriate for them to be so. Maybe you are associating them with the Cross City line or something?

Everyone knows I don't like the Cross City ;)

Noises are unique (reminds me of the LU '96 stock - do you loathe that too?).

The 1996 Stock sound much better. None of this F1 wannabe stuff, even though it reaches much higher pitches far more easily. Further, it only changes frequency a couple of times before hitting typical travel speed, as opposed to about 10 low-frequency shifts which sounds far worse. I am a little bored of the 1996 Stock though, having used them countless times between West Ham and Waterloo...
 

WestCoast

Established Member
Joined
19 Jun 2010
Messages
5,576
Location
Glasgow
The 323s aren't my favourite type of provincial EMU - that would have to be the 333s, but I really don't see the objection. However, you're entitled to your opinion and even in a true democracy it's the majority's voice that is heard the most.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Everyone knows I don't like the Cross City ;)

Is this also contributing to your dislike of them?
 

Robinson

Member
Joined
1 Aug 2010
Messages
623
Location
Helensburgh
I spent 6 years at boarding school in Manchester, travelling home and back every quarter term. Many of those journeys involved using Northern between Manchester Piccadilly and Preston, especially after direct Manchester-Scotland Voyagers ceased when Virgin lost CrossCountry.

You have no idea how many times I wished that line was electrified so we could have 323s to Preston, while I was stuck on a 150...
 

Lampshade

Established Member
Joined
3 Sep 2009
Messages
3,714
Location
South London
You have no idea how many times I wished that line was electrified so we could have 323s to Preston, while I was stuck on a 150...

This. I'm pretty sure the journey times on the stoppers would be at least ten minutes quicker with 323s over 150s; and the extra carriage would always be welcome.

The refresh of the Northern units is a definite marked improvement and they look rather smart. Just don't let Lampshade anywhere near them else there may not be any seat handles left <D

Ahem :oops:
 

150222

Member
Joined
9 Jul 2011
Messages
1,002
WestCoast all class 153's and class 155's have tables and FGW/ATW examples of class 150/2's do as well!
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,337
Ivo, sounds like your expecting 323s to be Intercity trains. The interior whilst not the most pleasant, is good enough, and is suited for the day to day work they do. Seats are quite fine as well.
As for speed. Thats unfair because they never get the chance to really speed up. However they have got a good top speed, and acceleration wise, they put a lot of EMUs to shame.
Well - they did used to work some Birmingham - Liverpool services, and that required lively running, although the 2+3 seating was less than ideal for such journeys.
 

Techniquest

Veteran Member
Joined
19 Jun 2005
Messages
21,674
Location
Nowhere Heath
They maintain a solid 90mph run between Macclesfield, Congleton, Kidsgrove and Stoke.

Think it's Macclesfield to Congleton where they really get going though. Did Macc to Stoke in August last year on a 323 and I was amazed how fast they could go. Need to do that run again sometime, or at least Stoke to Kidsgrove next time I do a WMDR. Nice to be able to scoop Northern units on a WMDR...

Anyway, Ivo clearly dislikes the 323s. Sadly, nothing we say can change his mind there. One day he may end up getting on one and having a brilliant journey on one and completely change his views. The exact opposite has happened to me before now...
 

150001

Member
Joined
24 Jul 2011
Messages
492
The 323s are excellent; never had any problem with them yet and they are quick and comfortable but the interiors aren't suited to intercity trips.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top