Search results

Genuinely baffled by this. A driver taking off his coat whilst departing isn't a great look for a business? Have we hit that level of madness now?

If a move is being top and tailed with a slow speed limit that would dictate thru piped loco to loco with the unit being unbraked so translation isn't required.

Black box shows 508126 & 507026 for today's move to Newport.

It was top and tailed with 2 class 37s so the liklihood that this is an unbaked move. I don't believe LO 710's have the ability to translate unlike 720's and 730's.

Whilst that is a logical assumption cancellation of tenders can be one or more of multiple situations. Perhaps the tender bidders didn't hit the threshold DRS was after? The winning bidders didn't have a capital to pay for their bid? With the info that more class 37's are to be added it may of...

221142 resides at Holbeck.

There must be an issue with RTT it's not a RailAdventure operated service.

The only tightlock fitted locos in ROG's fleet is 37800 & 37884.

Will they?

Don't expect a quick fix to return the sets into traffic.

East Anglian RHTT.

The TPE one has been a long standing rumour and gathered pace when it was announced the Trans Pennine route would be electrified.

Who says the 93's are replacing the class 37's? The CEO has been very public about their continued use even with the 93's coming on stream.

That's for the GBRf/Stadler contract. It has never been mentioned by ROG its being based at Leicester. Their original testing plan had Crewe as a mainline testing base. Whether that comes to fruition is anyone's guess however.

It's not moving by rail from Portbury to Leicestershire. It's going by road as per WNXX post.

93001 has finally made it to Portbury Docks.

Apparently they have customers from recent photos, but it doesn't really show high loadings.

On the back of a lorry.

43170, 48815, 48125 & 49107 according to TOPS.

I am lead to believe that is just one of the many things they will be doing with ROG.