Search results

This is one of, if not the best example of NR project communications. Of course real test is that the local residents receive and are aware of it and find it useful. From the outside it does seem that many other projects are not very good at this sort of thing

The Mayor's proposal must be also taken with the revised HS2 proposal, from one of the same Mayor's, which would link into it. I.e mostly back to the previous scheme

Anyone know why it wasn´t done?

What's HOTNAT?

Is this within the local mayor remit or with National Government? Also I suspect had the budget for electrification been broken even more it may have reached Temple Meads some years ago before being almost immediately modified for other works not in the original plans

As a German colleague said about Stuttgart 21: "Don't include the year in which you intend to finish in the project name as it then becomes very obvious when it's late"

What are the 'Stafford bypass' option(s) mentioned and how do they differ from 2a?

Could a separated departure hall, wherever it is either downstairs or upstairs, be dedicated first class & business?. Presumably takes less space and might free up a lot of capacity in the current area?

what route will they take in Italy, and do they have indicative journey times?

there is a dedicated thread to these engineering works https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/engineering-works-between-manchester-and-bolton.260514/

within the last year NS accept contactless from your bank card, so you can avoid the 1€ that way

Looking at 1st Jan, which I think is a Sunday timetable. I was under impression this is not so much of a one-off though

If I read it correctly the Peterborough line Sunday service terminates at KX and does not go through the core, at least in early January. Yet other services from ECML do go through the core. Anyone know why?

Better stop covering the countryside in housing then

Ah ok, so that could be a trial, but if success main use would still be as I described? Would make a lot of sense to trial on already existing infrastructure

I thought the idea was based around using them for trams and trying to avoid the costly need to have to divert every utility in the road as with the reduced weight the risk of damage to said utility was sufficiently reduced. So really to open up new tram possibilities rather than anything on the...

Not between Manchester & Leeds! NPR (any version) maybe. More seats could be relatively easily solved fairly quickly with longer trains

This is true, but the problem is this seems to happen a lot of the time and makes a poor case for rail travel vs alternatives. Whichever way you look at it the timekeeping of DB both locally and nationally is awful

they have a more, to my mind, sensible way of doing it by building relatively short sections at a time. But that's probably not a topic for this thread 1700771593 I suspect Stuttgart 21 will unlock a lot of to be ex railway land for very profitbale development

As they haven't got anywhere near starting it you cannot possibly say that