Search results

Please explain your point sir. Do you mean it could regularise travel prior to detection.

Thank you. Would you suggest that s.29 could be used to withhold all the information that is held on a particular data subject, even if in isolation certain items of data would be disclosable under an SAR?

Ladies and gentlemen, Considering the general case only, would we suggest that 'data' held by the prosecution department of a TOC for possible consideration of settlement offer/prosecution et al is likely to constitute: -sensitive personal data or -exempt data under section 29 of the...

Yes.... not saying you're wrong.

It was a question rather than a statement. But a ticket without a payment is surely not a valid one?

How much is the premium, and how much does travel on 32 dec 2017 and 1 & 2 jan 2018 equate to?

So has 'Sean' committed a byelaw offence? Could Southern have a surprise for him before the mags?

So what happened in court on the 21st?

I don't believe this to be correct.

Is that as an attachment from earnings order?

Just to emphasise that parking on railway land is backed up by railway byelaws and the magistrates court so NOT relevant to the parking eye/Barry Beavis supreme Court matter.

(2) A person shall hand over his ticket for inspection and verification of validity when asked to do so by an authorised person. This op did hand over their ticket for inspection on the train. 18(2) is therefore satisfied? Oh, you mean it actually should read "when asked to do so by one...

If that is what the letter says, send a copy of the ticket and railcard and see what happens next.

So telling them you're 5'6" with blue eyes won't really help?

Hmm. Few issues here: -a station isnt public (anyone seeking to rely on NRs recent accession to public authority note that we are going back to Nov 2014). -even stations that have a public right of way are still private land -in general there is no unfettered right of access to a concourse or...

I expect there will be a case management discussion and an order to appoint a joint expert. Barry is one option, and arguably someone from this forum could be another bet (doubtless everyone knows who I have in mind, though he hasn't posted in this thread yet). However, if it is about how...

I wonder if sealing that empty house letterbox up (tape on the outside) meaning that royal mail would return as 'address inaccessible) could be worthwhile?

I'd like to see some kind of QR code at these stations so that people can scan it and it proves that they were there. In reality a PAYG smart card scheme with touch in readers at the station and top up at some local cafe or corner shop is what we need.

They will certainly field a complaint. The issue is getting them (any pte) too be proactive and add value.

It's a rail industry thing. A friend had cause to complain to a division of First Bus, and was told that the errant bus driver had been moved from the route and given a final written warning.