Good Afternoon,
I got the delayed 11.56 'stopper' from Barnes to Waterloo today that was altered to go non-stop to Waterloo, I presume to try and make time. It was expected at 12.05, which in turn would have delayed another stopper at 12.04, until this was routed in first. Therefore at 12.06 we departed but immediately before Putney slowed down due to the stopper just in front of us. This happened all the way to just before Clapham Junction where we put on to the fast line, which meant we got in the way off a fast service which had to wait for us. Eventually we passed the stopper at Queenstown Road.
My point is surely it was more sensible to put us on the fast line immediately after Barnes so that we could of overtaken the stopper and made up more time rather than go at half speed the majority of the way; it just seems silly to make the service fast to Waterloo then have it go so slowly most of the way?
I got the delayed 11.56 'stopper' from Barnes to Waterloo today that was altered to go non-stop to Waterloo, I presume to try and make time. It was expected at 12.05, which in turn would have delayed another stopper at 12.04, until this was routed in first. Therefore at 12.06 we departed but immediately before Putney slowed down due to the stopper just in front of us. This happened all the way to just before Clapham Junction where we put on to the fast line, which meant we got in the way off a fast service which had to wait for us. Eventually we passed the stopper at Queenstown Road.
My point is surely it was more sensible to put us on the fast line immediately after Barnes so that we could of overtaken the stopper and made up more time rather than go at half speed the majority of the way; it just seems silly to make the service fast to Waterloo then have it go so slowly most of the way?