• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

1959 ECML Electrification Report

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rich Brown

New Member
Joined
13 Feb 2019
Messages
1
Whilst going through a large amount of rail related things after my father's death last year I came across an interesting document titled 'Report on the Modernisation and Elctrification of the East Coast Main Line between Kings Cross and Newcastle and Certain Associated Lines'. Published by the E & NE Regions in June 1959. Nice snappy title but fairly common in those days I think. My father worked in Newcastle at the time and had a few friends on the railways so I guess this was how he came by it. Its been a struggle to find much online about this study (I wouldn't go as far as to call it a scheme) but it does make for interesting reading and I've noticed a few references to early BR plans for the ECML on this forum. If anyone has any more light to shed into the shadowy world of the ECML in the time of the modernisation plan I'd be most interested.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

delt1c

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2008
Messages
2,125
It has been well documented in many publications that the original proposal was to electrify both the WCML and the ECML, however at the time the ECML electrification was dropped. The Deltics were introduced to the ECML as an alternative
 

Taunton

Established Member
Joined
1 Aug 2013
Messages
10,084
There was quite a lot of work done on the ECML electrification project at the time, including some publicity. I recall a colour poster promoting it, portraying Grantham station, wired, with an E3001 electric loco, in blue, approaching from one direction, and a Clacton-style express emu, in maroon, going the other way.
 

Helvellyn

Established Member
Joined
28 Aug 2009
Messages
2,013
I recall a colour poster promoting it, portraying Grantham station, wired, with an E3001 electric loco, in blue, approaching from one direction, and a Clacton-style express emu, in maroon, going the other way.
I am sure I recall that the 309s were designed as an InterCity style unit and were seen as planned with for London to Leeds services.
 

High Dyke

Established Member
Joined
1 Jan 2013
Messages
4,281
Location
Yellabelly Country
Not quite the era of the OP, but found this article regarding the ECML electrification project that we are probably familiar with these days. Of note is the work carried out on the bridge South of Doncaster station; I hadn't realised the engineering project that was undertaken on that one bridge alone.
At Doncaster, the Nine Arch bridge required increased clearance beneath the arches that carried five running lines to the south. Alongside these tracks, there was space in the adjacent arches which enabled concrete buttresses to be built so that structurally the bridge was split into three sections. The buttresses enabled the central section to be demolished without impacting upon the other two sections.

By dint of sawing the bridge into two halves longitudinally, it proved possible to keep the bridge open to road traffic while the central section was reconstructed. This feature was much appreciated by the local authority, which had intimated that there was no way they could agree more than a long weekend closure of such an important road within their city centre.

https://www.railengineer.co.uk/2017/11/27/ecml-electrification-as-it-used-to-be/
 

delt1c

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2008
Messages
2,125
I am sure I recall that the 309s were designed as an InterCity style unit and were seen as planned with for London to Leeds services.
The 309's were designed as an Intercity Unit for West Coast and East Coast services, have a look at the design speed and the GER maximum speed speed at the time and ask why?
It is a shame that the design was not taken forward as they had so much potential
 
Last edited:

RLBH

Member
Joined
17 May 2018
Messages
962
It would certainly be fascinating to see more about BR thoughts on electrifying the ECML in the Modernisation Plan era. It's a subject that's rife with rumours and speculation, but clearly one that was seriously considered.
The 309's were designed as an Intercity Unit for West Coast and East Coast services, have a look at the design speed and the GER maximum speed speed at the time and ask why?
There are quite a few services where the 309s could easily have found a niche; they were basically a 25kV AC version of the 4Cig and 4Big that Southern Region was building at the time. One obvious one that I've come across is that early studies for the Class 123/124 DMUs listed Manchester and Liverpool to Wolverhampton, Birmingham and Coventry as a potential route, dropped due to electrification.
 

2392

Member
Joined
7 Apr 2015
Messages
248
Location
Felling on Tyne
The North Eastern Railway had planned to electrify half their section [York - Berwick upon Tweed] of the East Coast Mainline in 1920, Sir Vincent Raven even went to the extent of building a prototype electric express locomotive the ill fated 13. They already had a dozen electric locos 1-2 worked on Tyneside running from Manors to the Newcastle quayside and No. 3-12 on the Newport [Thornaby] - Shildon line, hence the next loco being No. 13. Anyway the plan was to electrify between York and Newcastle at first.
 

delt1c

Established Member
Joined
4 Apr 2008
Messages
2,125
It would certainly be fascinating to see more about BR thoughts on electrifying the ECML in the Modernisation Plan era. It's a subject that's rife with rumours and speculation, but clearly one that was seriously considered.

There are quite a few services where the 309s could easily have found a niche; they were basically a 25kV AC version of the 4Cig and 4Big that Southern Region was building at the time. One obvious one that I've come across is that early studies for the Class 123/124 DMUs listed Manchester and Liverpool to Wolverhampton, Birmingham and Coventry as a potential route, dropped due to electrification.
Hence why the 309's were built with a design speed of 100mph, when the GE had no such stretches
 

Sad Sprinter

Established Member
Joined
5 Jun 2017
Messages
1,829
Location
Way on down South London town
This post interested me, as it could give me an idea for an alternate history timeline on the alternatehistory.com forums so I did a little more digging. Found this little document from 1955 with a handy map at the end showing that electrifcation only as far as York was to be electrified. Was wiring all the way to Newcastle a later plan?

Also, would Broad Street have been electrified to 25kv overhead in this plan?
 
Last edited:

coppercapped

Established Member
Joined
13 Sep 2015
Messages
3,099
Location
Reading
This post interested me, as it could give me an idea for an alternate history timeline on the alternatehistory.com forums so I did a little more digging. Found this little document from 1955 with a handy map at the end showing that electrifcation only as far as York was to be electrified. Was wiring all the way to Newcastle a later plan?

Also, would Broad Street have been electrified to 25kv overhead in this plan?
The 1955 Modernisation Plan had this to say about electrifying the major trunk routes:

43. It is the intention to electrify two major trunk routes, and one of lesser traffic density, under the Plan. The main line of the Eastern and North Eastern Regions from King's Cross to Doncaster, Leeds and (possibly) York, and the main line of the London Midland Region from Euston to Birmingham, Crewe, Liverpool and Manchester, will comprise the two major schemes. The subsidiary main- line scheme will consist of the extension of the existing electrification from Liverpool Street (which will soon reach Chelmsford) to Ipswich, including the Clacton, Harwich and Felixstowe branches. By these schemes there will be a virtual elimination of steam from important areas of the country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top