What is it now, 4th female & 2nd non-white leader. Some of the other, lets say more traditional, parties have some catching up to do
Glad it was her, really didn't like the other guy.
Diversity attitudes seem to be an area filled with hypocrisy among the political class; while it will be present everywhere, the Tories are where it's most visible. They happily promote the diversity of the party leaders they've had in their history and put down other parties for apparent lack of it. However when it comes to identity politics/diversity policy in general, they make arguments like "I prefer they appoint/award the best person for the job, regardless of ethnicity/sex/background", and/or "the civil service/NHS/BBC could save money not appointing diversity officers".
If I was to assess all the Tory party leaders who were not white males, the only one who I'd argue had a good degree of competency was Thatcher, considering her long premiership, electoral success and some other policy areas (even though there are plenty of other policies she's rightly loathed for). May was weak and incompetent, Truss was, well, no explanation needed there, while Sunak was also weak and very poor at finding the right advice, with the worst ever election result for the Tories to his name. Of course Boris Johnson also shows that being a white male does not on its own make one good for the job either.
While talking about diversity policy, perhaps it's a good time to recall this Yes Minister Classic: