• We're pleased to advise that our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk, which helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase, has had some recent improvements, including PlusBus support. Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

24 Jul Coventry-Berkhamsted - inconsistencies between sites

Status
Not open for further replies.

ashley84

Member
Joined
18 Jun 2021
Messages
31
Location
Birmingham
Hello,

I am trying to book some tickets between Coventry-Berkhamsted return, for 2 adults + 2 children on a family railcard, on 24 July. It is for a day trip so aiming to depart at 9-ish and leave at maybe 5-ish. We would prefer to have a flexible ticket although may use advance fares if there is a significant saving.

I'm getting oddly different fares from different websites. If I use the West Midlands Railways site, it tells me that the cheapest Off Peak return is £48.90, which tallies with what brfares.com says (2x £19.00 and 2x £5.45).

However, if I do the same search on Avanti's site, the cheapest return fare it offers is £116.30, and only shows options that involve some time on an Avanti train. I can force it to only show direct trains, which then offers me the WMR/LNWR only fares, but there are still discrepancies on the price - £67.65 for an off-peak return or £50.25 for a super off-peak return.

I was wondering if anyone knows the reason for this please? It has been a long while since I last booked some tickets beyond very local journies, but I was under the vague impression that in theory all sites should offer the same fares and see the same timetables?

Thank you for any help.



2.PNG


3.PNG
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,638
The Avanti website is rubbish, full of inaccuracies, and best avoided. Even for a simple journey such as London to Manchester - a route which you might think mattered to Avanti - it can't get things right: as well as direct trains, it shows unnecessary (no cheaper) itineraries via Sheffield, as well as completely incorrect itineraries via Grantham, including a tube journey on the itinerary, even though the ticket doesn't include a tube journey (so the customer would be rejected by London Underground staff, correctly).

You can get an Advance fare on the way out for £10.10, and a Super Off-Peak single (giving you flexibility) on the way back (but a bit later) for £23.50, total £33.60. That's pretty good. Try Railsmartr.co.uk for this.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
11,248
Location
UK
including a tube journey on the itinerary, even though the ticket doesn't include a tube journey (so the customer would be rejected by London Underground staff, correctly).
Incorrectly. If a customer is given an itinerary in conjunction with a particular ticket, the ticket is contractually valid on the stated trains. Even if not intended to be on the TOCs' end.
 

alistairlees

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2016
Messages
3,638
Incorrectly. If a customer is given an itinerary in conjunction with a particular ticket, the ticket is contractually valid on the stated trains. Even if not intended to be on the TOCs' end.
Of course. London Underground staff would doff their caps and accept it without question.

The issue here is not London Underground, but Avanti's poor booking engine.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
11,248
Location
UK
Of course. London Underground staff would doff their caps and accept it without question.

The issue here is not London Underground, but Avanti's poor booking engine.
I mean, we all know what the practical position is, but it doesn't mean LU are in the right.

As you say, the Pico engine underpinning Avanti's website (as well as c2c) leaves "something to be desired"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top