Chris172
Member
- Joined
- 3 Feb 2018
- Messages
- 120
I was wondering as many 3rd rail EMUs have a max speed of 100mph, is there any stretches of line were the max speed is 100 mph for these units to obtain?
Presumably you’re referring to the Brighton line (VTB), because the Bournemouth line (the actual BML) does have 100 mph sections, albeit mostly east of Southampton…Not any on the BML if I remember rightly. Altough mostly 90 MPH limits/
The sectional appendix has a caveat that the 100 mph sections only apply to 442, 444, 450, 701, 707, but also anything that counts as an HST. Which would be 220/221 in this area.But isnt that because some of them have DMUs on them (Voyagers etc) which dont need 750v 3rd rail?
And yes I mean the Brighton ML
Cl 442 were 100mph capable.Presumably you’re referring to the Brighton line (VTB), because the Bournemouth line (the actual BML) does have 100 mph sections, albeit mostly east of Southampton…
Used to be a Stretch on the BML near Three Bridges on the Fast Lines, was put in for 319s I believe. Since Removed.I may be wrong, but I seem to remember 100mph on either side of a 90 mph limit through Gatwick station fast lines.
yes, I included them in the follow up post.Cl 442 were 100mph capable.
Yes you did. SorryDidn’t I list them?
They probably no sooner added them back in the SA than they were withdrawn again. Probably keeps someone in an office busy.Yes you did. Sorry
Really dredging my brain here but didnt the Cl442 pioneer some new Brecknell Willis shoegear to make sure current collection was Ok at 100mph?They probably no sooner added them back in the SA than they were withdrawn again. Probably keeps someone in an office busy.
I suppose though, given they all use similar shoe gear, any other suitable third rail EMU would manage 100 mph along there, they’ve just never been needed to be cleared yet.
It may have done, I wasn’t aware at the time, but I think it’s been posted here before.Really dredging my brain here but didnt the Cl442 pioneer some new Brecknell Willis shoegear to make sure current collection was Ok at 100mph?
Raising a speed limit from 90 to 100 is largely a waste of money unless the section it is clear of any speed restrictions for at least 20 miles. Allowing for 1 mile to accelerate to 100 and a similar distance to decelerate, that would save about 80 seconds, but would cost a considerable amount to set up and get clearance, and then there's the increase in energy costs and maintenance costs of both rolling stock and infrastructure.I was wondering as many 3rd rail EMUs have a max speed of 100mph, is there any stretches of line were the max speed is 100 mph for these units to obtain?
Isn’t the line down to Bournemouth the South West Main Line.Presumably you’re referring to the Brighton line (VTB), because the Bournemouth line (the actual BML) does have 100 mph sections, albeit mostly east of Southampton…
publically yes, but internal documents such as the sectional appendix it’s the “Bournemouth Main Line”.Isn’t the line down to Bournemouth the South West Main Line.
Raising a speed limit from 90 to 100 is largely a waste of money unless the section it is clear of any speed restrictions for at least 20 miles. Allowing for 1 mile to accelerate to 100 and a similar distance to decelerate, that would save about 80 seconds, but would cost a considerable amount to set up and get clearance, and then there's the increase in energy costs and maintenance costs of both rolling stock and infrastructure.
Even in good times it would be a very poor return on funding, and a totally irresponsible proposition for the next few years.
It's downhill from Earlswood to Gatwick and also Balcombe tunnel to Gatwick so 319s would have had no problem getting to 100 on those sections. I doubt they'd have got anywhere near 100 going the other way though. It was a PR stunt by Connex. Assuming instant acceleration and ignoring the 90 through Gatwick station the 100 mph section saved around 40 seconds.One wonders how worthwhile the 100mph section around Three Bridges / Gatwick was for the 319s, given how the 1980s EMUs tend to die once past 80-85 mph. I vaguely recall the 319/2s may have had modifications, but this would presumably only improve things by a nominal amount.
publically yes, but internal documents such as the sectional appendix it’s the “Bournemouth Main Line”.
Those are the Engineers Line References. BML is Waterloo to Bournemouth (Bournemouth Main Line) and VTB is Victoria to Brighton.All bridge / structure plates are listed as BML XX too.
I think the only mods that the 319s had that affected their performance was the raising of the braking of the early batches from 9% to 12%, (a standard for express trains in those days). The gradual change of AMBR pantographs to Brecknell-Willis high-speed types would have had a very minor speed impact in terms of their performance (under wires of course) but pointless south of the river.One wonders how worthwhile the 100mph section around Three Bridges / Gatwick was for the 319s, given how the 1980s EMUs tend to die once past 80-85 mph. I vaguely recall the 319/2s may have had modifications, but this would presumably only improve things by a nominal amount.
If you need an entire mile to get from 100 to 90 there's something seriously wrong with your brakes......Raising a speed limit from 90 to 100 is largely a waste of money unless the section it is clear of any speed restrictions for at least 20 miles. Allowing for 1 mile to accelerate to 100 and a similar distance to decelerate, that would save about 80 seconds, but would cost a considerable amount to set up and get clearance, and then there's the increase in energy costs and maintenance costs of both rolling stock and infrastructure.
Even in good times it would be a very poor return on funding, and a totally irresponsible proposition for the next few years.
If you mean SR, then none; if you mean BR(S) then 90mph was permitted between Tonbridge and Ashford from electrification, so it would be CEP/BEP/HAP/MLV. The regional limit was lifted to 90 from then.Which were the first "heritage" Southern 3rd rail emus to be allowed at 90mph, then 100mph?
I may be wrong, but I seem to remember 100mph on either side of a 90 mph limit through Gatwick station fast lines.
Yes I recall there being a rather small distance able to do it that seemed almost pointless to have. Presumably much more of the route could do 100mph were it not for the heavy traffic flows?Used to be a Stretch on the BML near Three Bridges on the Fast Lines, was put in for 319s I believe. Since Removed.
I believe its also possible to do 100mph on the old Eurostar connection from the SEML at Dollands Moor, which is third rail for a stretch while the transition to OHLE is made (seriously doubt anything does that now though there). Interestingly 90mph can be achieved all the way through Ashford on the through lines, but I do wonder how much that capability is utilised, as the freight that runs through won't do it, and every passenger service calls there.I think the 3rd rail routes passed for 100mph (for certain stock types) are:
- the SE former Eurostar route from Sevenoaks to Sandling (before the Eurotunnel/Dover routes separate) - about 40 miles
- the SW main line between Byfleet and Eastleigh - about 50 miles
There are lower limits through major stations/junctions (eg Tonbridge, Ashford, Basingstoke-Worting Jn).
On the SW route the 100mph is not always on both lines.
Cl 442 were 100mph capable.
Really dredging my brain here but didnt the Cl442 pioneer some new Brecknell Willis shoegear to make sure current collection was Ok at 100mph?
Not necessarily, the whole train needs to be clear of the start of the 100mph before increasing speed and fully down to the succeeding speed limit before passing the 90mph start (or whatever it is). So given that a mile only takes 40 seconds at 100mph, that's putting a load on the driver if it is any tighter.If you need an entire mile to get from 100 to 90 there's something seriously wrong with your brakes......
I do get your point though - at those speeds a 10mph speed improvement isn't going to make much difference - unless it's part of an overall package, and/or increasing the limit is more a paperwork exercise then something requiring much capital investment.