16CSVT2700
Established Member
Basically you're saying the back ups would have been retrieved and all the fraudsters exposed by the CIA/FBI/WTFwhogivesacrap?
No, thats not how it works matey.
No, thats not how it works matey.
50149 said:Basically you're saying the back ups would have been retrieved and all the fraudsters exposed by the CIA/FBI/WTFwhogivesacrap?
No, thats not how it works matey.
50149 said:Basically you're saying the back ups would have been retrieved and all the fraudsters exposed by the CIA/FBI/WTFwhogivesacrap?
No, thats not how it works matey.
Ascot said:Without getting into an argument. Some THEORIES are been discussed about the hitting of the North Tower how there was an explosion Before the aircraft hit. http://911physics.atspace.com/Pages/Boeing.htm <-- backup claim.
Cockfosters said:BBC and ITV for example put out lots of different stuff. Television news, which I rarely see, differs: BBC will have quality reporting of the facts (though they are starting to be more populist now), whereas ITV will have whichever sensational story can get the most viewers. The BBC is meant to be totally free of bias whereas ITV is not. Don't beleive something just because it is on the news.
I know what iteration is...
Let us suppose that a rich banker wanted to get off the hook and decided to fly a plane into the World Trade Centre. Surely the Government would have picked up on this? Though I can see why they might want to blame it on Islamic terrorists, and where people have started their theories from. However flying a plane into a nearby building which might collapse and might just collapse in the right way to destroy some documents... is very far fetched.
I don't know if you've ever worked in system administration, but it is good practice to perform backups and put them offsite. This will especially be important in banking institutions, do you think the backup tapes are just put in the filing cabinet or something? They are usually taken to secure locations away from the main site. Hence should anything have happened to the hard disks on the machines in the WTC, the data should be on a backup tape elsewhere.
Ascot said:THey we're not normal hi-jacked aircraft that hit the towers. Unless ATC decided to just ignore them and not scramble any jets.
Plus the fact that convieniantly, a huge group of the USAF fighers had fecked off thousands of nautical miles away on a 'training mission'. This left 14 F-16s to cover the whole of the US.traveller1030 said:NORAD decided not to scramble jets once it had deviated from its expected flightpath, if I remember the reportage correctly. A fatal error caused by complacency or complicit action with the 'objective', I know not.
Sprog said:Plus the fact that convieniantly, a huge group of the USAF fighers had fecked off thousands of nautical miles away on a 'training mission'. This left 14 F-16s to cover the whole of the US.
Also, apparently NORAD where very busy anyway with a series of complicated training excercises etc, so they where probably rushed off their feet, again, very convieniantly....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_information_actlaverack222 said:Look Sprog, I personally found the documentary very interesting and for me cast a whole new light on the events of 9/11. Some of the things mentioned are in my opinion too very odd. It's just a shame that the US government think they can keep all inside workings a complete secret from the world. If only they had a freedom of information act
However, can we calm it down guys? I've had to delete what I percieve to be a completely ridiculous post considering the warnings from my colleagues. Everyone is entitled to their opinions, but just stop the flaming!