• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Arriva Rail North DOO

Status
Not open for further replies.

Halifaxlad

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
1,373
Location
The White Rose County
Surely the intention of these strikes isn't to make any kind of point but to cause financial losses to Northern.

Labour or at least their leader does occasionally call for the railways to be re-nationalized no-doubt the RMT follow suit. Here is the latest tweet from Jezza...

https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1078558167049687041
Jermy Corbyn / Twitter / @jeremycorbyn / 11:48 PM - 27 Dec 2018
 
Last edited:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Carlisle

Established Member
Joined
26 Aug 2012
Messages
4,129
This point has been made by so many of us, time after time. I don't think there's an answer that follows any logic.
Presumably (bar a sudden change of RMT policy or northern’s capitulation) there’ll be a proportion of members who support continued strikes for as long as there’s a workable possibility of the dispute being concluded on a GWR or Scotrail (Ie driver release guard close) model rather than a Southern one
 
Last edited:

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,518
Surely the intention of these strikes isn't to make any kind of point but to cause financial losses to Northern.

Labour or at least their leader does occasionally call for the railways to be re-nationalized no-doubt the RMT follow suit. Here is the latest tweet from Jezza...

https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn/status/1078558167049687041


I'm sure even the RMT knows that the strikes cause little financial concern for Arriva as it appears that the DfT pick up the bill.
Those who seek re-nationalisation of the railways do, presumably, realise that state funding is more likely to go towards schools, the elderly, policing, and the health service in preference to the railways ?
 

Bevan Price

Established Member
Joined
22 Apr 2010
Messages
7,337
This point has been made by so many of us, time after time. I don't think there's an answer that follows any logic.

There is a sort of logic, and I regret to say that there seem to be some in RMT who may be too dim to recognise that, like Scargill and NUM, they are never going to be allowed to win - well not while we have a tory government -- and that militant union activity only increases the probability that tories will win the next few general elections - despite the mess the tories are making of Brexit, etc.
 

Puffing Devil

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2013
Messages
2,766
The two losers here appear to be the Guards, who are down 20% of income and the passengers who need to get to work or play.

Neither the government nor Arriva seem to be overly unhappy, or taking a hit that is as personally painful as that of the Guards or the pax.

Hence the strikes continue until someone at the top feels some pain.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,784
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
If the guards were bothered about that, they'd stop striking. AIUI many of them are making it up via overtime.

Maybe if Arriva want to force their hands they could cease offering overtime, but that of course would require getting a *lot* of buses in.
 

Halifaxlad

Established Member
Joined
5 Apr 2018
Messages
1,373
Location
The White Rose County
I'm sure even the RMT knows that the strikes cause little financial concern for Arriva as it appears that the DfT pick up the bill.

Surely the fact that the government picks up the bill and is therefore loosing money only further supports calls for the franchise to be taken under government control, indirectly supporting re-nationalization.

Those who seek re-nationalisation of the railways do, presumably, realise that state funding is more likely to go towards schools, the elderly, policing, and the health service in preference to the railways ?

You have to remember that a lot of people have claimed that getting rid of the guard is about saving money, pushed by the government who ironically the RMT presumably want to run our railways.
 

superkev

Established Member
Joined
1 Mar 2015
Messages
2,686
Location
west yorkshire
Friend of mine did Soweby Bridge Manchester Sheffield Leeds Sowerby the other day and didn't encounter a single ticket check. Am I alone in wondering what guards are paid to do.
K
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,764
Location
Yorkshire
Friend of mine did Soweby Bridge Manchester Sheffield Leeds Sowerby the other day and didn't encounter a single ticket check. Am I alone in wondering what guards are paid to do.
The primary role of a Guard is to do stuff like train despatch etc, and not revenue.

On some TOCs Guards do not ever do revenue (e.g. SWR have non-commercial Guards for their inner suburban routes). Revenue is pretty much last on the list of priorities. Several Northern Guards don't seem to do much in the way of revenue collection, and it's very rare to see revenue be collected on an evening on almost any route I've travelled on.

The new role is very different; the staff would not be allowed to remain in the cab and must instead be in the passenger accommodation, and the main purpose of their role is to provide customer service and revenue collection.

Not everyone likes the idea of having their role changed so that they can no longer remain in their own private compartment and instead have to be with the general public, so obviously this change isn't welcomed by them.

But it is arguably a good move for passengers, as it will reduce instances such as your experience, and will bring Northern up to the level of service customers can experience in other areas.
If the guards were bothered about that, they'd stop striking. AIUI many of them are making it up via overtime.
.
True, many of them aren't bothered, and clearly the wages they get despite not working Saturdays is sufficient for them for the foreseeable future.

I am lucky in that I can get alternative operators for almost all my journeys, and it doesn't really affect me. I've sometimes got to places quicker, and more cheaply, due to ticket acceptance. There have been times I've planned to do something in somewhere like Bradford and we've taken our business to somewhere else e.g. Wakefield instead but it had no negative impact on me.

It's the people who rely on the service at the smaller stations who are most affected.

It's probably good for bus companies!
I mean that simply striking every Saturday is utterly pointless for everyone. The Government/Northern aren't going to budge, the guards get their Saturdays off but lose a day's pay indefinitely and the passengers either use alternative methods of travel or just stay in the house/local area on a Saturday. For all the background noise this pathetic cold war of Saturday strikes could go on all next year with nobody budging an inch.

I'm not saying more strikes will achieve anything but if strikes are their way of trying to win (which is the intention) then why not strike through the week as well? Either that or knock the strikes on the head.They're getting nowhere as they are.
Yes it will achieve nothing, but the RMT aren't exactly the brightest of sparks, and they are not going to change their ways. They can't strike all through the week as Guards couldn't afford to do that.

Saturdays are the best day for them as Guards are more likely to want to have the day off as there will be other things they can do on Saturdays.
Surely the more moderate guards must be feeling the pinch by now and are thinking of asking their union to reduce the number of strikes? Most people with a family and a mortgage can't afford to take an indefinite 20% pay cut.

Maybe I'm being naive but striking say every other Saturday would enable RMT to keep up the pressure without their members suffering as great a financial loss?
It is a very well paid job when compared to many of the other jobs people with the necessary skills would otherwise be able to get, and they can claw back some (most?) of the amount back by working overtime.

I agree moderates probably would want to work but some depots probably have the sort of atmosphere where they would be criticised and ostracized by the more vocal ones; I've heard some stories about the culture at some mess rooms and it's not always good.
My point is that 40 strike days have achieved nothing, so 50, 80 or 100 are also very unlikely to change anything.
True but the RMT don't have the intelligence to realise this, and even if they did, they wouldn't care.
When the strikes first started though, they were relatively infrequent and on differing days so didn't cause too much inconvenience. Now, some lines haven't seen a service on a Saturday since August 18th which becomes more inconvenient. I do wonder if the strikes had started out at every Saturday back in March 2017 whether we would have had a conclusion by now
For people who rely on service at local stations, I agree it is worse. But RMT members will prefer Saturdays off, so I doubt we will go back to how things were before. For me, it's not an issue, as I just plan accordingly.
 
Last edited:

Mogster

Member
Joined
25 Sep 2018
Messages
905
The only group really suffering seems to be the pax as usual...

As most people work Monday-Friday then I’d say the weekday strikes were more inconvenient. I do work some Saturdays but car usage is more practical as the traffic isn’t as bad. Living in Wigan if I go for a night out in Manchester now the only option for getting home is an expensive taxi or hotel. The city centre hotels must be doing roaring trade, I’d suggest they’ve even put their prices up. I wonder if there’s any indication drinking and driving has increased? I wouldn’t be surprised.
 

a_c_skinner

Established Member
Joined
21 Jun 2013
Messages
1,585
There is a faintly odd thread running through traditional socialism in this country that is some way the "struggle" is worthy in itself, perhaps more worthy than any result. I wonder if this dispute has fallen into that mindset? Has the objective become a dispute, not a resolution?
 

gazzaa2

Member
Joined
2 May 2018
Messages
830
If the guards were bothered about that, they'd stop striking. AIUI many of them are making it up via overtime.

Maybe if Arriva want to force their hands they could cease offering overtime, but that of course would require getting a *lot* of buses in.

This is why it's a cold war. Nobody is suffering apart from the passengers ergo there's no end in sight.

It's great for the guards. They get their Saturdays off and if they want can make the money up elsewhere - they're hardly like the miners in the 80s. They could strike every Saturday into the 2020s as it stands. Stop their overtime and it might be different but Arriva can get by as things stand.

Yes it will achieve nothing, but the RMT aren't exactly the brightest of sparks, and they are not going to change their ways. They can't strike all through the week as Guards couldn't afford to do that.

Saturdays are the best day for them as Guards are more likely to want to have the day off as there will be other things they can do on Saturdays.

Not even a day or two while they still get overtime? So in effect the guards will take the easy option but aren't prepared to do what's necessary to try and bring things to a head. if you really want to win industrial action then wouldn't you have to make sacrifices if it's a cause you want to win at all costs? Surely that's the whole point. Taking the easy option of not working a day you'd rather have off anyway, in a lot of cases, is no sacrifice and if it's no sacrifice then it's not going to win you the dispute because the impact on the company won't be big enough. It's put up or shut up time for RMT/guards, this Saturday nonsense is just a half measure and it's only passengers that suffer. If it's not getting you the desired result then it's time for a rethink, whether that's more strike days or a stop on them.

In reality the RMT are settling on the Saturdays because they know the guard will back it. Start striking on random Tuesdays instead, or in addition, and they might not.
 
Last edited:

DaveB10780

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2015
Messages
210
Friend of mine did Soweby Bridge Manchester Sheffield Leeds Sowerby the other day and didn't encounter a single ticket check. Am I alone in wondering what guards are paid to do.
K
We went in to Manchester on the Buxton line on Thursday evening. Guard stayed in the cab the whole journey both ways even on a 2 car train. The plus side was that the train was dispatched with no delays!
 
Last edited:

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,370
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
Two of my wife's octagenarian friends from the Heald Green and Gatley areas with no car, but with three-year Senior Citizens Railcards, have an even more elderly relative they have visited each Saturday for the last four years, allowing for those times when the electrification work meant the service was "in limbo" up to the commencement of these Saturday strikes at her nursing home on the Rossall side of Fleetwood, as that is the day when the nursing home have made Saturday a special visiting day with "family visitor" events being laid on, as many visitors with elderly relatives at the nursing home who work Monday to Friday obviously cannot make regular visits in mid-week days.

They used to travel by rail to and from Blackpool North station then make the short walk to the bus stop outside the large Wilko store on the next block to the railway station to catch the number 14 Blackpool Transport bus that has bus stops on both sides of the road in front of the nursing home, but these Saturday strikes over the last few months have made alternative journey arrangements far too onerous for them.

Of course, as one of them is always at pains to state, "this never happened when TPE ran the rail service" in the "old days".
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
There is a faintly odd thread running through traditional socialism in this country that is some way the "struggle" is worthy in itself, perhaps more worthy than any result. I wonder if this dispute has fallen into that mindset? Has the objective become a dispute, not a resolution?
I think you're right. "We're sticking it to the Tories!" "Yeah but what about ordinary passengers?" "THE TORIES!" "I know, I know, is just you're not really achie..." "Can't you just accept that we're sticking it to the Tories?"

The beat goes on, as does this thread...
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Not everyone likes the idea of having their role changed so that they can no longer remain in their own private compartment and instead have to be with the general public, so obviously this change isn't welcomed by them.
Months of disruption because of this really does make you cry. Job roles change all the time, I don't have the luxury of telling my boss that I won't do what he asks of me!
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,432
Location
UK
Months of disruption because of this really does make you cry. Job roles change all the time, I don't have the luxury of telling my boss that I won't do what he asks of me!

Maybe you should join a Union.
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,518
Months of disruption because of this really does make you cry. Job roles change all the time, I don't have the luxury of telling my boss that I won't do what he asks of me!

To me, this is one of the frustrations of dealing with a dinosaur union. I would guess that most employees, in most organisations, are used to the need for considerable flexibility during their everyday working life. They are, usually, happy to go along with the varied needs of their employer, and know that any organisation needs a flexible workforce to survive and thrive.

Then you get the RMT.......

Not only does flexibility not appear in their dictionary but they fall back on 1980s-style strikes at the very earliest opportunity. It's no wonder that Arriva/DfT see little point in discussing anything with them.
 

DaveB10780

Member
Joined
10 Sep 2015
Messages
210
Months of disruption because of this really does make you cry. Job roles change all the time, I don't have the luxury of telling my boss that I won't do what he asks of me!
Clearly it is because the strikers are now thinking we can keep our jobs and have Saturdays off with minimal loss of pay. If not they would be trying to find a way to return to work rather than make every effort to prolong the agony. A sad state of affairs for those of us who just wish to travel (and probably those guards who do actually wish to do their jobs but cannot). Hence the only long term answer seems to be to hire some new people with different T&Cs.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
Maybe you should join a Union.
And do what? Say "no" to my manager at every turn? Stop working until I am absolutely satisfied with each and every detail of my job description?

I work in a medical records dept. within an NHS hospital. Things change all the time, hospitals are ever changing places where each day is different from the last. All those who work with me are used to being asked to add (and remove) certain parts of their job as and when required. It's the nature of the dynamic workplace we go to every day, there can't be an absolutely solid and fixed way of doing things. When I'm asked to collect patient notes in the morning because somebody is absent or sick (which is not in my job description) I say yes, of course, because if patient notes aren't collected and processed as soon as possible there are serious potential consequences down the line.
 

ComUtoR

Established Member
Joined
13 Dec 2013
Messages
9,432
Location
UK
And do what? Say "no" to my manager at every turn? Stop working until I am absolutely satisfied with each and every detail of my job description?

I do a lot of things that are not in my job description and I'm more than happy to do so. What I do not do is lay down like a carpet or bend over the table. Management often uses the term 'flexibility' to force and pressure people to do something outside of their terms. It also makes up for inadequacies in the workplace; especially where there is widespread under staffing.

'Flexibility' is also used to bully staff and to push them out or prevent promotion. Way back when discrimination was rife. Mothers were not employed or encouraged into the workplace because they weren't 'flexible' People got passed over because they weren't putting in the hours etc etc etc. Thankfully the law changed to better protect employees and push employers to have better working practices. Sadly, we are still in a place where there is a belief that the workers should shut up and do as their told, often to their detriment.

As I've said many times before. I've been that Manager who puts pressure on their staff and very much abused poor employment practices all for the sake of "the company" I've also been there in terms of working 70hr weeks for no reward or recognition. I've also been in a role where abusing the employees and circumventing employment law and doing some very disgraceful things was commonplace being on the receiving end of that was the final straw for me. Joining a Union put a stop to it overnight.
 

HowardGWR

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2013
Messages
4,983
It is said here that guards are making up their wages with overtime. Is that paid at premium rates (time plus quarter, half, etc)? If so, it seems to me that, if in the week that one day is struck, then any making up time element should be paid at normal rate, as it isn't overtime any longer. Stress 'if'. What is the case, anyone know?
 

Xenophon PCDGS

Veteran Member
Joined
17 Apr 2011
Messages
32,370
Location
A semi-rural part of north-west England
And do what? Say "no" to my manager at every turn? Stop working until I am absolutely satisfied with each and every detail of my job description?

Just wait until we leave the EC when most firms will have the opportunity to relocate away from the "British" socialist dogma of the type so well espoused of the RMT (remember that recent picture of what looked like a load of "bouncers" with hands raised with fists clenched) if they chose to do so.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
Months of disruption because of this really does make you cry. Job roles change all the time, I don't have the luxury of telling my boss that I won't do what he asks of me!

Maybe you should join a Union.

I don't know exactly what is being referred to in this case but I wouldn't want to be paid to be doing something which has no constructive value and if one of my duties is no longer required I would want it to be replaced by something else which has constructive value.
 

pemma

Veteran Member
Joined
23 Jan 2009
Messages
31,474
Location
Knutsford
As I've said many times before. I've been that Manager who puts pressure on their staff and very much abused poor employment practices all for the sake of "the company" I've also been there in terms of working 70hr weeks for no reward or recognition. I've also been in a role where abusing the employees and circumventing employment law and doing some very disgraceful things was commonplace being on the receiving end of that was the final straw for me. Joining a Union put a stop to it overnight.

We shouldn't need trade unions to deal with abuses of employment law, the government should make it easier for employees to report such employers and take action against such employers.
 

PR1Berske

Established Member
Joined
27 Jul 2010
Messages
3,025
I do a lot of things that are not in my job description and I'm more than happy to do so. What I do not do is lay down like a carpet or bend over the table. Management often uses the term 'flexibility' to force and pressure people to do something outside of their terms. It also makes up for inadequacies in the workplace; especially where there is widespread under staffing.

'Flexibility' is also used to bully staff and to push them out or prevent promotion. Way back when discrimination was rife. Mothers were not employed or encouraged into the workplace because they weren't 'flexible' People got passed over because they weren't putting in the hours etc etc etc. Thankfully the law changed to better protect employees and push employers to have better working practices. Sadly, we are still in a place where there is a belief that the workers should shut up and do as their told, often to their detriment.

As I've said many times before. I've been that Manager who puts pressure on their staff and very much abused poor employment practices all for the sake of "the company" I've also been there in terms of working 70hr weeks for no reward or recognition. I've also been in a role where abusing the employees and circumventing employment law and doing some very disgraceful things was commonplace being on the receiving end of that was the final straw for me. Joining a Union put a stop to it overnight.

You do make some good points and I agree with you on many things. I am not standing here wanting to promote management running roughshod over everybody and damn the consequences. From where I stand, and from my experience in the NHS, there are times when being the one employee refusing to budge from their understanding of the job role is the wrong thing to do for the department as a whole. Sometimes you have to have your job role expanded or reduced, and sometimes technology will redefine your purpose and things develop and change. Of course any bending over the table should be resisted, of course exploitation should be identified and stopped. Where I disagree with people on the pro-RMT side of this thread is proportion: striking for 6 months+ over a moderate change in a job description looks to me as being madness, particularly when passengers on far less money than the guards are so unfairly disrupted as a result. It would not be tolerated at my workplace.
 

Dave1987

On Moderation
Joined
20 Oct 2012
Messages
4,563
You do make some good points and I agree with you on many things. I am not standing here wanting to promote management running roughshod over everybody and damn the consequences. From where I stand, and from my experience in the NHS, there are times when being the one employee refusing to budge from their understanding of the job role is the wrong thing to do for the department as a whole. Sometimes you have to have your job role expanded or reduced, and sometimes technology will redefine your purpose and things develop and change. Of course any bending over the table should be resisted, of course exploitation should be identified and stopped. Where I disagree with people on the pro-RMT side of this thread is proportion: striking for 6 months+ over a moderate change in a job description looks to me as being madness, particularly when passengers on far less money than the guards are so unfairly disrupted as a result. It would not be tolerated at my workplace.

Can I ask you one very simple question? Do you actually know what the ordinary members are striking over? Let’s take out all the utter utter nonsense that this thread has descended into from certain forum contributors with utterly ridiculous suggestions about motives. Have you ever spoken to an ordinary person on the shop floor so to speak to ask them why they support the strike action? Because if you have not how can you possibly pass judgment?
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,764
Location
Yorkshire
Let’s take out all the utter utter nonsense that this thread has descended into from certain forum contributors with utterly ridiculous suggestions about motives.
I really wish we could! Or you could just not post it in the first place....
You do make some good points and I agree with you on many things. I am not standing here wanting to promote management running roughshod over everybody and damn the consequences. From where I stand, and from my experience in the NHS, there are times when being the one employee refusing to budge from their understanding of the job role is the wrong thing to do for the department as a whole. Sometimes you have to have your job role expanded or reduced, and sometimes technology will redefine your purpose and things develop and change. Of course any bending over the table should be resisted, of course exploitation should be identified and stopped. Where I disagree with people on the pro-RMT side of this thread is proportion: striking for 6 months+ over a moderate change in a job description looks to me as being madness, particularly when passengers on far less money than the guards are so unfairly disrupted as a result. It would not be tolerated at my workplace.
Agreed.

It just wouldn't happen at any workplace I've worked in. The suggestion of "join a Union" isn't applicable as many of us are already in Unions, but the difference is that our Unions are more pragmatic and sensible, the attitude of workers is more reasonable, and the workplace environment is more contemporary and less hostile.

The railways are stuck in the dark ages in many respects and it is down to the militancy of the Unions.

I would not want to work in an environment where a Union and its supporters was instructing me to be so militant and hostile towards my employer, with threats of being ostracized if I came in to work and accepted that job roles change.
 

Robertj21a

On Moderation
Joined
22 Sep 2013
Messages
7,518
Can I ask you one very simple question? Do you actually know what the ordinary members are striking over? Let’s take out all the utter utter nonsense that this thread has descended into from certain forum contributors with utterly ridiculous suggestions about motives. Have you ever spoken to an ordinary person on the shop floor so to speak to ask them why they support the strike action? Because if you have not how can you possibly pass judgment?


I look forward to hearing the clear view from the shop floor........
 

johntea

Established Member
Joined
29 Dec 2010
Messages
2,600
The only group really suffering seems to be the pax as usual...

As most people work Monday-Friday then I’d say the weekday strikes were more inconvenient. I do work some Saturdays but car usage is more practical as the traffic isn’t as bad. Living in Wigan if I go for a night out in Manchester now the only option for getting home is an expensive taxi or hotel. The city centre hotels must be doing roaring trade, I’d suggest they’ve even put their prices up. I wonder if there’s any indication drinking and driving has increased? I wouldn’t be surprised.

I don't think the weekday strikes were that effective, other than if you lived in an area where there is no train service at all during the strikes, generally there would still be a morning train to get you to work at some point and an early evening one to get you home even if you had to leave slightly earlier, my employer certainly had no issue with this as I could then either do some work from home or make up the hours another day in the week.

With a Saturday strike I can't plan a day out as I would have to think about getting home mid afternoon, so I tend not to bother at all now! The saving grace for me I suppose is I can get home from Leeds via an Arriva bus if I need to so that gives me options, but appreciate other areas won't be so lucky!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top