• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Blackpool - Manchester Electrification

Status
Not open for further replies.

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,711
Location
Leeds
I expect because electrification supply areas and switching/isolation boundaries don’t map onto ELRs 1:1 so it is much safer to have dedicated codes.
But the codes they do use seem to be entirely about routes, not switching/isolation boundaries.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,874
Location
Nottingham
Yes, the number part of the codes originally related to mileposts although more recent schemes use the metric equivalent. Since ELRs are closely tied to mileage it would make perfect sense. There is also a safety benefit, because the structure numbers are used to identify position when making an emergency call and having a uniform set of position references makes it more likely that everyone will correctly interpret that information.

You don't want to make the codes dependent on feeding arrangements, otherwise changing them would mean changing all the plates too.
 

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK
I've added Chris's shots to a new album for him here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/127646831@N03/albums/72157696677201640

and added Reg's shot to his album here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/127646831@N03/albums/72157671732263863

All three can be found in the Combined Volume here:

https://www.flickr.com/photos/127646831@N03/albums/72157661069863633

Thanks to both of you.

Please note that many more of Chris's shots can be found by clicking on the very first image in the Combined Volume then looking down the Comments below. Chris is one of several people who have kindly linked their own albums for us all to share.
 

snowball

Established Member
Joined
4 Mar 2013
Messages
7,711
Location
Leeds
From the caption to some of the pictures:

The Mast references from Deal Street Junction, Salford to Euxton Junction are of the form MG nn xx where "MG" mnemonically refers to the Manchester-to-Glasgow line (Manchester to the WCML). nn and xx are typically pairs of numbers, so "MG13 21" means mast 21 in section 13 of the line MG". The ELRs for Deal St to Euxton Jct are MVE1 as far as Bolton then MVE2 the rest of the way to Euxton.
I'm pretty sure the "sections" are kilometres.

On the original 1960s WCML electrification they are miles from Euston, and change at mileposts. On the 1970s extension (e.g. north of Weaver Junction on the route to Glasgow) they are kilometres from Euston. On the ECML they are kilometres from King's Cross throughout.

Since a kilometre is less than a mile, the numbers just north of Weaver are substantially bigger than those just south (both with prefix G), so there are no ambiguous numbers.
 
Last edited:

edwin_m

Veteran Member
Joined
21 Apr 2013
Messages
24,874
Location
Nottingham
I'm pretty sure the "sections" are kilometres.

On the original 1960s WCML electrification they are miles from Euston, and change at mileposts. On the 1970s extension (e.g. north of Weaver Junction on the route to Glasgow) they are kilometres from Euston. On the ECML they are kilometres from King's Cross throughout.

Since a kilometre is less than a mile, the numbers just north of Weaver are substantially bigger than those just south (both with prefix G), so there are no ambiguous numbers.
Yes, the electrification engineers went metric sometime around 1970.

Another complication for the northern WCML and ECML is that the mileage re-starts from zero in various places reflecting the historic ownership by different companies. So just using the mileposts would have been ambiguous or needed yet another set of prefixes to distinguish.
 

reg

Member
Joined
15 Mar 2015
Messages
70
Location
Bolton
Bolton-seems to be an all out effort to complete the ATF troughing to the nw of Bolton station (Bolton west/Bullfield area).2 teams working this morning to join up the gaps.Photo to follow
 

LDECRexile

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2014
Messages
2,149
Location
Southport, UK

John Boy

Member
Joined
23 Jan 2016
Messages
22
I took the opportunity to speak to somebody in the know.

Ask if they were snagging. The response was its far from finish.

Big programme of works scheduled for this weekend
Engerisation due week 31 which is 2 weeks off
9 day blockade at Victoria over xmas
£75 million fine for Network rail if they don't meet they deadline
 

59CosG95

Established Member
Joined
18 Aug 2013
Messages
6,488
Location
Between Peterborough & Bedlington
I took the opportunity to speak to somebody in the know.

Ask if they were snagging. The response was its far from finish.

Big programme of works scheduled for this weekend
Engerisation due week 31 which is 2 weeks off
9 day blockade at Victoria over xmas
£75 million fine for Network rail if they don't meet they deadline
Eeesh. Things looked so rosy for a couple of weeks. At least there's a firm date for energisation now. @Joseph_Locke - would the works at Man Vic over Christmas be owt to do with the "Great Extension Lead" from Heyrod?
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,649
Location
Mold, Clwyd
It will be the ORR threatening a penalty.
But the money usually stays in the railway system - may go to pay for the disruption to Northern/TPE.
But the target date is unclear (to me, anyway), now that the timetable change has been put off till May 2019.
 

Joseph_Locke

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2012
Messages
1,878
Location
Within earshot of trains passing the one and half
Eeesh. Things looked so rosy for a couple of weeks. At least there's a firm date for energisation now. @Joseph_Locke - would the works at Man Vic over Christmas be owt to do with the "Great Extension Lead" from Heyrod?

I'll get back to you

4th november is'nt it?
Is it an april-april calendar they go off like the bus companies?

NR has its own that (typically) starts with week one beginning the first Saturday in April, but it isn't always true and some years have to have 53 weeks ...
 

driver_m

Established Member
Joined
8 Nov 2011
Messages
2,248
If it's not already posted. Weekly notices have the line between Salford Crescent and Buckshaw from Sat 27th Oct. 0400hrs to be treated as live . Including offshoots at Bolton & Lostock.

Also quite a few speed changes too. Including some 100mph sections.
 

GRALISTAIR

Established Member
Joined
11 Apr 2012
Messages
7,865
Location
Dalton GA USA & Preston Lancs
If it's not already posted. Weekly notices have the line between Salford Crescent and Buckshaw from Sat 27th Oct. 0400hrs to be treated as live . Including offshoots at Bolton & Lostock.
Also quite a few speed changes too. Including some 100mph sections.

Now to me that is real progress. Obviously plenty of snagging still to be done and the Stretch east of Man Vic. Still great news IMHO.
 

td97

Established Member
Joined
26 Jul 2017
Messages
1,298
Also quite a few speed changes too. Including some 100mph sections.
Do any services currently get a 158 on the line? IIRC not all Barrow services have been 185 operated since May. The 185 Barrow service might benefit, depending on whether the non-MU limits have also been raised. Might not make too much difference for the 142/150/156 services.
Definitely encouraging progress though!
 

Magicake

Member
Joined
25 Aug 2009
Messages
121
Engerisation due week 31 which is 2 weeks off

Week 31 is only one week off, it starts next Saturday 27th.

@Joseph_Locke - would the works at Man Vic over Christmas be owt to do with the "Great Extension Lead" from Heyrod?

I don't think so, I think it's the final works and energisation on the new OLE from Victoria towards Miles Platting (East)

What date is this final deadline for all works to be completed etc.?

The electrification needs to be ready for the 15th December timetable change. Needs to be completed before then of course for testing and so the ORR can check it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top