• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Blind man forced to sit on floor of Virgin train....

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
7 Oct 2015
Messages
590
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5093167/Blind-man-forced-sit-floor-Virgin-train.html

A blind man travelling on a Virgin train with his guide dog claims that he was forced to sit on the floor for two-and-a-half hours

Roger Debman says a train conductor pointed to the floor and instructed him to 'sit there' after he complained.

Debra, who is Roger's carer, as well as being a nurse at the Royal Liverpool University Hospital, said: 'As soon as we got on the conductor said the train was full. He came back to say there isn't anywhere to go....


Will Virgin be brave enough to get the CCTV out for this one!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,525
Is there a source for this that isn't the Daily Mail?

There appears to be a vacant seat on the third row of the VTEC picture and the 'return journey' looks like a 350...
 

TT-ONR-NRN

Established Member
Joined
30 Dec 2016
Messages
10,473
Location
Farnham
Just read the article and AGH! Why must people blame Richard Branson and his brand for the selfishness of passengers???
 

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,525
Just read the article and AGH! Why must people blame Richard Branson and his brand for the selfishness of passengers???
I think the question should be "why do people invent news stories to embarrass TOCs?". :rolleyes:
 

Bayum

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2008
Messages
2,905
Location
Leeds
Is there a source for this that isn't the Daily Mail?

There appears to be a vacant seat on the third row of the VTEC picture and the 'return journey' looks like a 350...

It makes direct reference to the return journey being via London Midland. The point raised is that on the return journey, the passenger was able to find a seat. Because it wasn't a disabled seat, there was no space for the dog without other customers getting irritated that the dog is in the aisle. Would VTEC have been happy to allow him to have a seat whereby the dog would be blocking their aisle? Who knows. But if the customer needs a carer to be with him, then should he have been expected to sit by himself with his dog ?
 

Starmill

Veteran Member
Joined
18 May 2012
Messages
23,393
Location
Bolton
This isn't really a reliable source, so unless there is a reliable source that has some facts I'd just ignore it.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,826
Location
Yorkshire
It sounds like the train was fully reserved when he bought the ticket, and knew of this, but decided to travel on the train anyway.

Obviously with a coach or plane, there is no option to board a fully reserved service, but with a train people can travel on such a service on the understanding there is no guarantee of a seat.

Given some of the sensationalist, and irrelevant stuff that has been said by the two passengers (e.g. reference to the cycle spaces, which are in the DVT!) make me believe that this is a non-story and there is rather more to it than claimed.

If you need a seat, don't take a train that is already fully reserved, surely?

This isn't really a reliable source...
Very true. They refer to "disabled seats" for a start. I don't think Daily Mail journalists are particularly bright.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,244
Location
No longer here
Reminds me of this:

http://metro.co.uk/2013/08/13/speci...dont-want-you-spoiling-their-journey-3922313/
The youngsters from the Stage Right Theatre Group, based in South Lanarkshire, Scotland, were on their way back from a trip to the Edinburgh Fringe festival when they found standard class packed to the brim...

Rebekah Aitken, 25, who runs the group at Carluke Leisure Centre every Sunday, was clearly angered by the treatment of her pupils, aged four to 11, on the service from Edinburgh Waverley.

She told the Daily Record: ‘We were discriminated against because of the disabled kids we had with us.

‘I’m embarrassed for the kids as they were paraded in front of the passengers and made to feel like an inconvenience.

‘The train manager thought they weren’t of the standard to be allowed to sit in the business carriage...


I recall that well, and even the likes of renowned bull****ter and egotist Stephen Fry retweeted a petition against XC. The TM in question was apparently distraught.

The complaint was a complete tissue of lies and XC earned my enduring respect by investigating it thoroughly and eventually issuing a statement blatantly calling the complainant a liar. Because that’s exactly what they were.
 
Last edited:

Tetchytyke

Veteran Member
Joined
12 Sep 2013
Messages
13,305
Location
Isle of Man
I think we've all had to sit on the floor of a Virgin Train because of their failure to reserve seats properly.

Maybe I sound callous, but does being blind mean you can't stand up?
 

tsr

Established Member
Joined
15 Nov 2011
Messages
7,400
Location
Between the parallel lines
I'm really not sure why the guide dog in the aisle was so much of a problem. I've seen countless dogs in or near train aisles, usually only attracting positive attention, and when they are reasonably intelligent (such as assistance/guide dogs) they tend to move when they sense there is a problem. It's not like it's an obstacle which won't move out of everyone's way of its own accord, like a bike or suitcase.

If the passenger had been travelling on a lot of TOCs, the designated priority seats may have little or no more space around them than others - it's merely a sticker and an expectation of consideration from fellow passengers.
 

Bayum

Established Member
Joined
21 Mar 2008
Messages
2,905
Location
Leeds
I think we've all had to sit on the floor of a Virgin Train because of their failure to reserve seats properly.

Maybe I sound callous, but does being blind mean you can't stand up?

I think it's more likely to be the fact that he's possibly blind because of the ream of issues leading up to the blindness.
 

Chrism20

Established Member
Joined
27 Feb 2013
Messages
1,347
Two and a half hours on the York to Peterborough train?

The York to London stopper does York to Peterborough in 95 minutes.

Without sounding heartless they have planned a trip on a service that had no reservations available and expected people just to jump. Surely for their own comfort they could have adjusted their travel times and made sure they got the seats they required.

Also doesn’t the EMT Liverpool to Norwich service stop at Peterborough? Surely this would have made more sense or am I missing something?
 

Tim R-T-C

Established Member
Joined
23 May 2011
Messages
2,143
There seems to be an endless rant on Twitter about trains being too busy, usually followed by people saying that the railways should be nationalised because that would fix it.

Even funnier when they complain that fares are too high at the same time. When BR's solution to this problem would have been to raise fares to reduce demand and stop overcrowding!
 

xc170

Member
Joined
9 Feb 2008
Messages
815
Controversial view point here maybe...

Everywhere you look, we're tied up with political correctness and equality. Blind or not, we've all sat on the floor of a busy train at one point because we couldn't find a seat.. that's only fair and equal, isn't it?

Get over it.
 

MG11

Member
Joined
4 Nov 2017
Messages
638
Controversial view point here maybe...

Everywhere you look, we're tied up with political correctness and equality. Blind or not, we've all sat on the floor of a busy train at one point because we couldn't find a seat.. that's only fair and equal, isn't it?

Get over it.
I am not having a go at Virgin here, trains do get busy and Virgin are already operating more coaches than say Hull Trains and Grand Central. But, I would imagine being blind causes a sense of being off balance, which can be made worse when in motion. I wonder if the priority seats were being used by passengers who required them though, and not just able bodied/minded passengers.
 

AlterEgo

Veteran Member
Joined
30 Dec 2008
Messages
20,244
Location
No longer here
Controversial view point here maybe...

Everywhere you look, we're tied up with political correctness and equality. Blind or not, we've all sat on the floor of a busy train at one point because we couldn't find a seat.. that's only fair and equal, isn't it?

Get over it.

No, it’s not equality.

That’s a bit like saying that “everyone has to manage steps so why should wheelchair users have a ramp?”

It still doesn’t mean Virgin have done anything wrong though and I’m sure there’s plenty we aren’t being told.
 

traintimemf

Member
Joined
6 Sep 2016
Messages
35
intersting one this one, as I hate what the new franchise has been doing on the east coast (complaints for another thread hah) but I honestly can't see the issue here

I don't see how being blind is a reason he shouldn't sit on the floor, were someone in his seats and the conductor wouldn't kick them out? if so, this is the issue Imo and nothing to do with blindness

also 3 hours, from York to Peterborough is he sure (sorry is the DM sure? there is a couple of time estimates in that piece) takes less time Newcastle to London lol
 

scrapy

Established Member
Joined
15 Dec 2008
Messages
2,092
I think we've all had to sit on the floor of a Virgin Train because of their failure to reserve seats properly.

Maybe I sound callous, but does being blind mean you can't stand up?

It means you can't easily locate handrails or places to brace yourself if the train suddenly brakes or moves sideways.
 

Redonian

Member
Joined
31 May 2014
Messages
95
Unsurprisingly, given it's a Daily Mail story, there are some very odd things about this. The blind man was travelling Liverpool - Peterborough but somehow seems to have been travelling on a train from York - Peterborough on VTEC yet returning with London Midland on a 350 which obviously go nowhere near Peterborough.
Unexplained is why he didn't use the hourly EMT Liverpool - Peterborough service.
 

Gemz91

Member
Joined
1 Feb 2013
Messages
678
Location
Garden Shed
This thread is Rail Forums Uk at its best "why can't blind people stand up like the rest of us?"

Use some common sense and have some heart. The guys blind, and either can't see, or has some form of lack of vision. Surely it can't be pleasant for a blind person to be sat on the floor, sensing people walk past you that you can't see.

If he's stood, he won't be able to easily know where hand rails are to hold onto, or see other hazards such as luggage, door ways or other passengers.

Football fans get a bad reputation on this forum, but there's plenty of times I've seen football fans give up seats for older passengers, or passengers feeling unwell when others have remained seated. Maybe rail enthusiasts are less pleasant travellers then football fans are?
 

Redonian

Member
Joined
31 May 2014
Messages
95
Those questioning the journey time, not using EMT's Liverpool-Peterborough direct services etc, see my earlier post, post #16...
I think I can see what went on.
On a weekday Virgin's journey planner does offer a Liverpool - York - Peterborough journey although why you would use it is beyond me when you could get an EMT train direct especially as changing trains for a blind man cannot be easy. The prices are no different.
If the return was on a Saturday then what is offered is Peterborough - Birmingham with Cross Country and onwards to Liverpool with London Midland hence the 350.
 

SS4

Established Member
Joined
30 Jan 2011
Messages
8,589
Location
Birmingham
I think the question should be "why do people invent news stories to embarrass TOCs?". :rolleyes:

The answer to that one is usually for compensation and/or exposure. What better way to get free tickets or publicity? Packed trains are far from a polarising issue especially outside the industry/enthusiast community.

In this case I wonder how many outlets did their due diligence and checked the veracity of the report given to them? Could explain why it's nowhere else.

disclaimer: I've not read the article because I refuse to give money from those who obtain it by spreading hate and fear.
 

yorkie

Forum Staff
Staff Member
Administrator
Joined
6 Jun 2005
Messages
67,826
Location
Yorkshire
Those questioning the journey time, not using EMT's Liverpool-Peterborough direct services etc, see my earlier post, post #16...
The story doesn't make sense either way.

Liverpool to Peterborough via York does make sense if the fast East Coast Main Line is open.

A lengthy journey time between York and Peterborough means it no longer makes sense to travel this way.

Also, why travel via this route, if the train is fully reserved and this fact was known when the tickets were purchased? There could be a reason, but it seems a bit odd.

Use some common sense and have some heart. The guys blind, and either can't see, or has some form of lack of vision. Surely it can't be pleasant for a blind person to be sat on the floor, sensing people walk past you that you can't see.
If you know if you need a seat, it doesn't make sense to travel via this route on what you know to be a fully booked service without a reservation.
 

Senex

Established Member
Joined
1 Apr 2014
Messages
2,754
Location
York
Without sounding heartless they have planned a trip on a service that had no reservations available and expected people just to jump. Surely for their own comfort they could have adjusted their travel times and made sure they got the seats they required.
Exactly so. If you need special conditions, then you need to make a reservation. If there isn't one to be had on the train you'd ideally like to use, then surely you have to modify your travel plans. You can't expect just to turn up and have space created for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top