• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Boundary between northern and southern England on WCML

Status
Not open for further replies.

Western Sunset

Established Member
Joined
23 Dec 2014
Messages
2,509
Location
Wimborne, Dorset
I always felt that seeing the large base-load power stations such as Rugeley, Ratcliffe and West Burton, heralded the arrival of the "north". Of course, Didcot was the outlier...
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Meerkat

Established Member
Joined
14 Jul 2018
Messages
7,529
The entire WCML is North of the Thames, so it’s all northern!
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,668
Location
Mold, Clwyd
Chester is barely in England. Some of its suburbs are in Wales.
And its football ground... ;) (though I think the access and public facilities are in England).
Saltney station and junction was in England, while the urban area was/is in Wales.
Chester PSB controls the railway across the border as far as the outskirts of Wrexham, and as far as Connah's Quay on the North Wales Coast line.
Carlisle PSB controls a little way across the border into Scotland.
Borders are funny things.

The BBC North Region was always defined as including "north Derbyshire, north Nottinghamshire and Lincolnshire".
Which was presumably the reach of the original Holme Moss transmitter.
 
Last edited:

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
1,922
Location
Crewe
Traditionally on the WCML the boundary between West Midlands and North is at Madeley, the summit (and watershed) between Crewe and Stafford.
 

CW2

Established Member
Joined
7 May 2020
Messages
1,922
Location
Crewe
Isn't Whitmore (just north of the site of the old station) the actual summit of the line?
Around MP 148.
Yes, Whitmore is the actual summit but Madeley is the nearest operating location, and hence the administrative boundary.
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
Presumably, it's Crewe or just south thereof. That is, the boundary between the Network Rail routes and where the Manchester & Rugby ROCs areas of operation are slated to meet.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,953
Presumably, it's Crewe or just south thereof. That is, the boundary between the Network Rail routes and where the Manchester & Rugby ROCs areas of operation are slated to meet.
There are different boundaries depending on what department you talk to. Planning was at Madeley and Mow Cop/Congleton, LNW south and north is at Armitage, Rugeley and Penkridge, the sectional appendix routes won't change for internal NW&C route boundaries.

How does that fit with the old Sectional Appendices and WTTs being "LMR [Western Lines] Crewe and South Thereof" and "Crewe and North Thereof?"
Nothing alters there, no one will change them.
 

Philip

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2007
Messages
3,648
Location
Manchester
North of Milton Keynes and south of Crewe is Midlands. North of Crewe is North. South of Milton Keynes is south.

I find the accent can be a good non-official indicator. If we're to include the West Midlands then I think my initial suggestion of Kilsby is quite accurate between the Southern/RP accent turning into West Midlands. Both in railway, canal and urbanization terms I find Stafford and Stone the most northern points to hear a predominantly West Midlands accent.

Cheshire East might be geographically and officially in the north, but the accent certainly isn't 'northern'.
 

eMeS

Member
Joined
12 Jun 2011
Messages
954
Location
Milton Keynes, UK
North of Milton Keynes and south of Crewe is Midlands. North of Crewe is North. South of Milton Keynes is south.
Just to confuse matters, Milton Keynes seems to have been joined to Bedford (18 miles to the east) for NHS grouping purposes; and on TV yesterday (I think) I saw the first recognition of this new grouping.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,673
Location
Northern England
Heading north from London:
- Anything served by GTR, I consider to be the south, so I would say Milton Keynes is towards the north of the south
- Roughly between MK and Stoke , the local stopping services are primarily provided by West Midlands Trains, so you're in the Midlands
- Between Stoke and the Scottish border, the local stopping services are primarily provided by Northern, so you're in the North
- After that, you're in Scotland.

No idea if this is a sensible way to think about at all, but that's the way it is in my brain...
 

Mcr Warrior

Veteran Member
Joined
8 Jan 2009
Messages
11,814
Heading north from London:
- Anything served by GTR, I consider to be the south, so I would say Milton Keynes is towards the north of the south
- Roughly between MK and Stoke , the local stopping services are primarily provided by West Midlands Trains, so you're in the Midlands
- Between Stoke and the Scottish border, the local stopping services are primarily provided by Northern, so you're in the North
- After that, you're in Scotland.

No idea if this is a sensible way to think about at all, but that's the way it is in my brain...
That's both as logical and as arbitrary as any analysis we've had so far.

So that would presumably place both Rugby and Stafford as in the "Midlands"?
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,673
Location
Northern England
That's both as logical and as arbitrary as any analysis we've had so far.

So that would presumably place both Rugby and Stafford as in the "Midlands"?
Yes... it probably doesn't make a lot of sense, but honestly drawing a figurative line like this is always going to create some issues. In reality it's more of spectrum from northern to southern england - with Stafford clearly being more "northern" than Rugby, but neither being definitely in the North or the South.

To someone living in Cumbria, it likely feels that they're a long way into the south by the time they reach Rugby, but for someone living in Birmingham or Coventry possibly less so.
 

73128

Member
Joined
8 Dec 2019
Messages
420
Location
Reading
When I was younger, and lived south of the Thames (and was roaming around the country on all-line rovers), I always considered that Watford tunnel led to the north. oh for the 0745 Euston to Glasgow and 1730 back (due Euston 2237) and the Electric Scots....
 

LNW-GW Joint

Veteran Member
Joined
22 Feb 2011
Messages
19,668
Location
Mold, Clwyd
North of Milton Keynes and south of Crewe is Midlands. North of Crewe is North. South of Milton Keynes is south.
In railway terms, HS2 will eventually dictate boundaries.
Assuming it reaches Crewe in essentially one bound (combining Phases 1 and 2a), that will put HS2 and its ETCS operation south of Crewe in the "south".
You'd maybe expect the current WCML south of there* to also be "south" (but probably under a different management), and that leaves everything north of Crewe as "north", as per ROC plans.
How HS2b north of Crewe and the linked NPR will be managed, is for the future.
And Crewe itself - under NR "north" I would guess.
We still don't know who will be controlling/maintaining HS2, and under what contractual basis.
(HS1 is operated by NR under contract to London & Continental, and the route is differently regulated to the classic network).

* Presumably the section around Colwich currently controlled from Stoke will eventually migrate to Rugby, making the 135 miles Watford-Crewe (exclusive) controlled from Rugby.
 

The Planner

Veteran Member
Joined
15 Apr 2008
Messages
15,953
In railway terms, HS2 will eventually dictate boundaries.
Assuming it reaches Crewe in essentially one bound (combining Phases 1 and 2a), that will put HS2 and its ETCS operation south of Crewe in the "south".
You'd maybe expect the current WCML south of there* to also be "south" (but probably under a different management), and that leaves everything north of Crewe as "north", as per ROC plans.
How HS2b north of Crewe and the linked NPR will be managed, is for the future.
And Crewe itself - under NR "north" I would guess.
We still don't know who will be controlling/maintaining HS2, and under what contractual basis.
(HS1 is operated by NR under contract to London & Continental, and the route is differently regulated to the classic network).

* Presumably the section around Colwich currently controlled from Stoke will eventually migrate to Rugby, making the 135 miles Watford-Crewe (exclusive) controlled from Rugby.
Colwich goes into Rugby in 2023. I doubt the boundaries need to change, NR and HS2 have a route boundary and thats it, there needs to be one somewhere around the signal system transition anyway.
 

Watershed

Veteran Member
Associate Staff
Senior Fares Advisor
Joined
26 Sep 2020
Messages
12,077
Location
UK
making the 135 miles Watford-Crewe (exclusive) controlled from Rugby.
I imagine that will make it the longest section of route continuously controlled by one signal box/SCC? York ROC has a greater overall geographic reach (Kings Cross to just north of Northallerton) but Peterborough and Doncaster PSBs control quite a bit of the route in between.
 

40129

Member
Joined
23 May 2014
Messages
412
I always used to think of the Midlands as being the part of the country where the Midland Red Omnibus Co ran the local town services. This split both Staffordshire and Oxfordshire in two as PMT ran Stoke on Trent and City of Oxford ran Oxford, whereas Midland Red ran Stafford and Banbury*

* IIRC Stagecoach now run Banbury as part of their Oxfordshire rather than Midland Red South operation though they still use the old Midland Red 'B' prefix for Banbury town services
 

midland1

Member
Joined
18 Aug 2019
Messages
298
Location
wigston
North of Milton Keynes and south of Crewe is Midlands. North of Crewe is North. South of Milton Keynes is south.
Back in the 1970s they used to an advert for some beer a group of men were talking about where the midlands were and one said it starts at Bletchley and ends at Crewe so I think the above is about right. Northampton to me is in the midlands, as Northamptonshire is part of the shires( Leic, Derby, Notts, Linc.)
 

norbitonflyer

Established Member
Joined
24 Mar 2020
Messages
2,391
Location
SW London
On the opposite side of the Country Lincoln similarly straggles both as the city is firmly midlands but the rest of the county is certainly northern.
Brought up in Lincoln by London-born parents. I wouldn't say that Lincolnshire as a whole is northern. In fact the three old "Parts" of Lincolnshire seem to belong to different regions - Lindsey (the part of the county north of the Witham and Fossdyke) is definitely northern in character, particularly the industrial belt by the Humber. The south western part, Kesteven, is a typical East Midland Shire county. And the Parts of Holland, in the SE, as its name suggests, is part of the fenlands of East Anglia.
The City of Lincoln is an oddity though - north of the river, and in particular the "uphill" area, felt more "shire county" than the southern part which had a lot of heavy industry in the past.

For most purposes though I would put the North/South divide as the River Trent, which crosses the ECML at Newark and the WCML at Rugeley. (I ignore the fact that it crosses back at Colwich!)
 

BeijingDave

Member
Joined
26 Jul 2019
Messages
394
Therefore, officlally, many parts of the Midlands are further north than places which are 'up north' proper and vice versa. This will not necessarily coincide with the perceptions of people who live in those borderline areas between 'Midlands' and 'North' as to whether they consider themselves to be 'Midlanders' or 'Northerners'. Places like Retford, Worksop, Glossop, Buxton, Stoke on Trent, Newcastle under Lyme, Chesterfield etc all spring to mind, all in the Midlands but their next nearest major regional city not being so. Accents, TV channels, which major regional centre they look towards for work, retail etc will all influence or distort that self or others perception of regional identity or affiliation one way or the other.

The same applies between the Midlands and the South. Banbury is in the 'South East' because it is in Oxfordshire whereas Kings Sutton, a few miles south of Banbury, is in the 'East Midlands' because it is in Northamptonshire.

Hope that clears that up.

All countries that are contiguous landmasses will have grey areas, and it's reasonable to highlight them there (Stoke's a good example because no-one, including a mate of mine from The Potteries, knows if they are North West or Midlands and I don't think anyone really wants to claim them either).

However, only a Southerner who never leaves the South East could possibly think of Birmingham or Coventry as 'oop north' (as they often like to sarcastically say it).
 

flixtonman

Member
Joined
18 Oct 2013
Messages
44
In the early days of the M1 motorway there was a sign reading 'Hatfield and the North'. Perhaps it's still there.
 

Gareth

Established Member
Joined
10 Mar 2011
Messages
1,449
Location
Liverpool
The main cultural North/South divide in this country is a line from the Severn to the Wash. It's our Mason-Dixon line.
 

muddythefish

On Moderation
Joined
13 May 2014
Messages
1,576
The main cultural North/South divide in this country is a line from the Severn to the Wash. It's our Mason-Dixon line.

Yes, agree. South of it there is no culture.

On the WCML, travelling from the north I always considered the train to be in the "south" once it had gone past the Bletchley area.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top