The Barlow Boy
Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 696
Came through London Bridge to-day and noticed that the outer windows on the ticket office still have "British Rail" writ large in several places.
Not in the slightest. They don't connect "a number of major cities" in any sense of the phrase. "A number" meaning more than just the two route extremities with a large number of inconsequential stops inbetween, and I wouldn't count Portsmouth as being "major". The 313s aren't really intended to cater for end to end journeys on the route as a high priority either.On that criteria the Brighton to Portsmouth service currently shamefully operated by class 313s with no toilets would be included in your Inter-City franchise.
I believe it has been stated that the average journey length on Crosscountry services is around 80 miles. I don't witness a great number of these 30 mile travellers in my regular forays on the Crosscountry network, and there are always a good proportion of passengers undertaking journeys far longer than the 80 mile average figure.many of the services that were intercity/long distance in nature in BRs days no longer are. FGW are primarily a london Commuter railway these days, XC was always a secondary Inter City route but these days is a provincial mid distance franchise with the average passenger travelling 30 miles.
I can't tell if you're being serious or not..
Although on a personal note, I'd love to see the 365s returned to NSE livery.. It suited them perfectly.
Not in the slightest. They don't connect "a number of major cities" in any sense of the phrase. "A number" meaning more than just the two route extremities with a large number of inconsequential stops inbetween, and I wouldn't count Portsmouth as being "major". The 313s aren't really intended to cater for end to end journeys on the route as a high priority either.
--- old post above --- --- new post below ---
Not in the slightest. They don't connect "a number of major cities" in any sense of the phrase. "A number" meaning more than just the two route extremities with a large number of inconsequential stops inbetween, and I wouldn't count Portsmouth as being "major". The 313s aren't really intended to cater for end to end journeys on the route as a high priority either.
Some interesting points. I would have to suggest that Portsmouth is a fairly 'major' location, with the links to the Isle of Wight and the continent, it's position as a major naval base, and the direct ferry link between Portsmouth Harbour station and the Gosport peninsular - one of the largest UK towns without a railway. There is really quite a wealth of journey opportunity, but the city has always tended to be bypassed as it requires terminating services, being on a branch. The Cardiff Central service could easily be intercity rather than inter-regional. As for the Brighton service and it's dreaded 313s, it has been discussed here previously that the service along the 'West Coastway' route is poor, with potential for more frequent fast links.