markydh
Member
Ok, to explain more fully, if you are waiting for a bus on Oxford Street and you were only travelling from one end to the other, you could get on any bus regardless of operator and pay the same single fare that has been set by Transport for London. It means you don't have to let one bus sail by because it's slightly more expensive (or less frequent), as is the case outside of London. In Newcastle, for instance, Stagecoach has its own Day Rider that costs £3.50. I can only use that ticket on Stagecoach buses operated by the 3 Tyne & Wear Stagecoach subsidiaries, yet Throckley where I live is also served by buses run by Stagecoach Cumbria, Go North East and Arriva. If I wanted ultimate choice between all their services then I'd have to pay £6.80 for a Day Rover, more than 100% more. Choice is therefore limited which is why competition doesn't really exist, certainly not to the benefit of the customer.Apologies; but you didn't mention ''harmonising fares'' in your original post. Aside from a common single fare of £1.30, I have no idea what ''London-esque universal ticketing arrangements'' means other than a multi-use ticket valid on any bus operator. In London, once you leave a bus then your single fare is no longer of any use to you, therefore the only unique thing about the arrangement in London is that a day ticket is valid on any operator, and these tickets do exist elsewhere.
They can also set up a quality contract, allowing control over fares, competition, timetables, etc. on a certain route.
NEXUS have acknowledged that there are major issues with ticketing, particularly when they tender out a service for evenings and Sundays to a different operator than runs the commercial daytime service as that operator's day ticket isn't valid on the tendered service, despite it running on exactly the same route. It means customers have to pay more if they aren't lucky enough to have a free bus pass, which is a massive disinsentive to use the buses. They are working on solutions to it and have indicated that they may go for Quality Contracts. The current tendering system just doesn't work. They are legally obliged to choose the offer that is best value to the taxpayer, regardless of what this means for the actual customers.
Last edited: