Topological
Established Member
Strong arguments for not using the current depot for the introduction of major new fleets:
Whilst they are ‘delayed’ The issue with having ETCS units doing other duties (as I understand it) is that the maintenance depot as Chester is already full to capacity (and currently struggling to keep enough regular 197’s in service each day), the ETCS 197’s will be based out of Machynlleth depot and that is needed to be free of 158’s to look after the 197’s.
Hopefully, there will be lessons learned. It is not as if there is a shortage of old industrial facilities, or even just old sidings, that could host depots.Should have avoided renewing the entire fleet in one go. Leave the 175s and Alstom in place until the South Wales Metro fleet was running. Possibly should have tried to get some 180s - if anyone could make them reliable it was Alstom Chester.