• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Caledonian Sleeper

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,266
That I didn’t know- makes a lot of sense in many ways.

Another point- did BR usually honour the fact that passengers were allowed to remain on board until well after arrival, or were they in practice keen to turf everyone off as soon as possible (as sometimes seems to be the case with CS’ Up Lowlander when it arrives early at Euston? The timetables seem to suggest that you’re allowed to stay in the berth until 08:00 at Euston on the up Highlander, but most crews that I’ve experienced seem to want you to vacate on arrival. The only time I ever used the northbound Lowlander into Glasgow, around a year ago, we were told to vacate on arrival just after 07:20, even though the timetable suggests that you can stay in your berth until about 07:45. Should the ’vacate cabins by’ times actually be taken with a pinch of salt? Obviously there’s no problem with the northbound Inverness or Fort William trains being ’vacate immediately on arrival’, as these arrive at very sociable times and the crews on these routes have had a long enough shift as it is!
On that last point - I don't know in terms of BR days. I would certainly agree that CS seem keen to turf everyone off ASAP. Interesting to note that the southbound lowlander is due into Euston at 0707, with "vacate rooms by 0730", even though the empty stock to Wembley isn't due off until 0854!
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

Scotrail84

Established Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,366
On that last point - I don't know in terms of BR days. I would certainly agree that CS seem keen to turf everyone off ASAP. Interesting to note that the southbound lowlander is due into Euston at 0707, with "vacate rooms by 0730", even though the empty stock to Wembley isn't due off until 0854!

What time do you think the on board staff should finish after being on duty since 21:30 the previous evening?
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,673
Location
Croydon
Do they? How do you know?

I suppose, through the middle of the night, some of the staff *might* get a chance to sleep. But they would have to wake up pretty sharpish if there was some kind of crisis. Needless to say it makes for a long stretch of unsociable hours.
 

43096

On Moderation
Joined
23 Nov 2015
Messages
15,266
What time do you think the on board staff should finish after being on duty since 21:30 the previous evening?
If they advertise you can stay on the train until 0730, then you should be able to do just that. From my experience they're keen to get you off as soon as.
 

alangla

Member
Joined
11 Apr 2018
Messages
1,178
Location
Glasgow
What time do you think the on board staff should finish after being on duty since 21:30 the previous evening?
The time it says in the timetable basically. Last time I traveled, the breakfast arrived an hour early and I was turfed off into a freezing cold London morning with over an hour until the early checkin at the hotel. I’d planned a relaxing breakfast then straight to the hotel to dump the bags & freshen up. Ended up killing time in a Costa instead
 

Peter Sarf

Established Member
Joined
12 Oct 2010
Messages
5,673
Location
Croydon
What time do you think the on board staff should finish after being on duty since 21:30 the previous evening?

Actually. This is the question. And the answer is the staff should be paid until some time after the last person is supposed to be allowed to get off. But that will be a rather long shift - where I work people get a handsome uplift on the basic pay for working 12-hour shifts. The staff will need time to clean up (although that might be done at the depot). The staff will also need time to prepare them selves for end of shift. In my limited experience of factories anything from 15 minutes downwards to nil is what is allowed. Caledonian sleeper cannot promise a time for customers to disembark and expect their staff to instantly be ready to leave work. That is unrealistic but then that sums up what CS seem to think the service can deliver :frown:.

The time it says in the timetable basically. Last time I traveled, the breakfast arrived an hour early and I was turfed off into a freezing cold London morning with over an hour until the early checkin at the hotel. I’d planned a relaxing breakfast then straight to the hotel to dump the bags & freshen up. Ended up killing time in a Costa instead

And obviously that is the inevitable result of squeezing the staff too far.
 
Last edited:

Scotrail84

Established Member
Joined
5 Jul 2010
Messages
2,366
If they advertise you can stay on the train until 0730, then you should be able to do just that. From my experience they're keen to get you off as soon as.

Who says you cant? Also I don't get why folk would want to stay on after arrival. It's not as if you can go back to bed is it.
 

jagardner1984

Member
Joined
11 May 2008
Messages
671
On the north link ferries into Aberdeen / Lerwick, there is a PA call into all the cabins about 15 minutes before the booked arrival time to update you on progress and to advise you of the need to vacate. Obviously this has particular significance because one vehicle driver oversleeping delays the whole process, but generally this feels like quite a natural way to wake up, be told information and be politely told to hurry up if you have slept to that point.

Personally I’d say the big problem with how it’s managed at the London end in particular is for your first moments of awake to be doors slamming and the sound of Euston rush hour coming into your cabin. In general though I’d say it’s an expectation vs reality thing, and actually politely alerting people via PA sometime after departure from Watford would get people gently awake rather than rudely awakened. Personally i feel the virgin lounge, whilst woefully undersized for the number of users, should be an option for all sleeper passengers, to me the implication of saying the cabins can be occupied until 0745 or 0800 or whatever is that you can sleep in them until just before then. I’m not sure with the tightness of the corridors, the busy nature of the station and the noisiness of human beings generally, that will ever be realistic, and certainly pushing staff hours to the limit doesn’t seem to be a reasonable way of achieving this.
 

TimboM

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
3,732
Ah ok thought it was still closed wonder why the stock wasn't worked ecs to inverness then.
HML was open this morning. Normal service for Scotrail over it today.
CS had to go early with the decision as to where to start M16 from, as stock needed cleaning / prepping. Couldn't second guess when a flood may subside, so made the call on Sat to start M16 from Perth and move the cleaning/prep operation there. Passengers informed accordingly yesterday.
 

Far north 37

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2011
Messages
1,951
CS had to go early with the decision as to where to start M16 from, as stock needed cleaning / prepping. Couldn't second guess when a flood may subside, so made the call on Sat to start M16 from Perth and move the cleaning/prep operation there. Passengers informed accordingly yesterday.
I see fair enough sounds like the best option at the time then.
 

Glenn1969

Established Member
Joined
22 Jan 2019
Messages
1,983
Location
Halifax, Yorks
I presume it must have been subject to a speed restriction given that RTT says the East Coast London service lost 22 minutes just getting from Carrbridge to Kingussie. Don't think CS deciding to start from Perth is that big a surprise
 

Far north 37

Established Member
Joined
13 Apr 2011
Messages
1,951
I presume it must have been subject to a speed restriction given that RTT says the East Coast London service lost 22 minutes just getting from Carrbridge to Kingussie. Don't think CS deciding to start from Perth is that big a surprise
All scotrail services today on time today through that section and into inverness.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Not going to happen though is it. Off BY 07:30 not at 07:30 (08:00) in Glasgow and Edinburgh

If the timetable says you have to be off by 0730, that means that stepping out of the exterior door at 07:29:59 is acceptable, and staff should not be hassling people to do otherwise. Just like in a hotel (and it does try to ape one) having a checkout time of say 1000 means you can check out, at your choice, at any time up to that point, including chucking your key on the front desk at 09:59:59, something I would very often do if I'm not in a hurry.

It does NOT mean "well, we might let you stay on until 0730 but we might want to head to our hotels earlier in which case we'll tip you off when we feel like".

If that is not what is on offer, the timetable should say what the situation actually is, i.e. remove the stipulation so people are expecting to leave when the train arrives.

If, however, individual staff are making their own rules up, like the Virgin Trains "Coach K" issue, the Company needs to deal with that issue and make it clear that it will not be tolerated without disciplinary action, and actually take that action if complaints are received.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"

MrEd

Member
Joined
13 Jan 2019
Messages
587
Who says you cant? Also I don't get why folk would want to stay on after arrival. It's not as if you can go back to bed is it.

With the Inverness and Fort William northbound I agree, but for the southbound workings, and the northbound Lowlander, the idea may be (as originally conceived) to let the passengers have as much sleep/time to use the en-suite facilities as possible. Obviously staff shift length is an issue here, as you rightly point out, and I appreciate that, but CS should be honest about this, and tell passengers that they need to vacate on arrival (or as soon as possible after), even if the train is running early. That way, they will at least know what’s expected of them and be ready to leave on arrival. This would avoid the need for staff to hurry along dawdling passengers, and the need for passengers to feel rushed in the mornings.
 

trebor79

Established Member
Joined
8 Mar 2018
Messages
4,443
With the Inverness and Fort William northbound I agree, but for the southbound workings, and the northbound Lowlander, the idea may be (as originally conceived) to let the passengers have as much sleep/time to use the en-suite facilities as possible. Obviously staff shift length is an issue here, as you rightly point out, and I appreciate that, but CS should be honest about this, and tell passengers that they need to vacate on arrival (or as soon as possible after), even if the train is running early. That way, they will at least know what’s expected of them and be ready to leave on arrival. This would avoid the need for staff to hurry along dawdling passengers, and the need for passengers to feel rushed in the mornings.
When I used the lowlander last year, the en suite facilities stopped working shortly after arrival at Euston when the ETS was turned off. My toilet was mid flush...
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
When I used the lowlander last year, the en suite facilities stopped working shortly after arrival at Euston when the ETS was turned off. My toilet was mid flush...

This would suggest that the best fix here might well be to remove the stipulation, i.e. state that people need to leave the cabin on arrival.

It's false expectations that are the main issue - particularly if it wasn't issues flushing the bog, but rather someone stood there naked in the shower having soaped up and unable to wash it off!
 

TimboM

Established Member
Joined
12 Apr 2016
Messages
3,732
What an almightily silly piece of design. I'm amazed they are allowed to remain in service in that state (or, if they're not required, I'm amazed they are present at all).
Have you read the article, including the comments from the ORR? They are evidently aware and don't require the one coach impacted (out of 75) to be taken out of service.

There's far more of a safety issue with spurious "emergency window open" alarms going off repeatedly and distracting the guard and driver from their safety critical duties; or the window inadvertently opening and colliding with a passing train or object.
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
97,783
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
Have you read the article, including the comments from the ORR? They are evidently aware and don't require the one coach impacted (out of 75) to be taken out of service.

There's far more of a safety issue with spurious "emergency window open" alarms going off repeatedly and distracting the guard and driver from their safety critical duties; or the window inadvertently opening and colliding with a passing train or object.

Then why do the windows exist? I can't imagine an aircraft being allowed to fly with an overwing exit locked off, for instance. They are either needed or they are not.
 

Essexman

Established Member
Joined
15 Mar 2011
Messages
1,380
I would make fewer journeys on the Lowlander if we had to vacate immediately on arrival. The night's sleep is short enough as it is.

I recently contacted CS about power going off soon after arrival in Edinburgh, midway through using en suite facilities. Customer Service said they were grateful for feedback and would pass it on.
 

Top