I see from another thread that Class 68 are to be graced with the tired old string of ship names. Couldn't anyone think of anything better? The railways are not part of the armed forces, yet there is this tradition of naming these poor locomotives after obscure regiments or ships. There have been some bright spots - the original Class 60 names were magnificent, as were the mixture of names applied to Class 47. I can understand naming locomotives after commercial customers, and almost forgive that. But, if you are going to name a class en bloc, then give them interesting names, that will send people scuttling off to the library to find the background.
And while I am at it, please stop this stupid practice of renaming things on a whim. Once an engine is named, that should be it!
And while I am at it, please stop this stupid practice of renaming things on a whim. Once an engine is named, that should be it!