Different validity between a Gold Card and Network Railcard? Seems unnecessarily complicated/confusing to me.
That's in line with ATOC policies, which appear to be to make things complex, and the DfT are happy for that to be the case.
*sighs* not even for journeys like Euston to MK? :eek:
I'm not convinced NRCoC Condition 10 can be swept aside so easily. Anyone got plenty of cash and a good solicitor to test this?
How, exactly? It is a regulated ticket. They can't just increase the price fivefold.
They'll find a way. They'll claim the price is "too cheap" and was "never intended" to be valid. And Passenger Focus will back them all the way, in their usual anti-passenger style.
Hmph. I just knew the world ‘simplified’ would appear somewhere regarding the changes….
Indeed. It fits the ATOC definition of "
simple"!
What will this mean for tickets routed any permitted where one route is a non-Gold card accepting TOC and another is?
I know some will disagree, but it's my opinion that this Railcard does not over-rule NRCoC Condition 10.
We could maybe start to see the beginnings of a national railcard.
No chance. There will always be some TOCs who are against it.
The likes of Virgin & East Coast hate walk-up fares as it spoils their yield management. In their ideal world, everyone would have Advance fares, apart from people who need to turn up & go, and those people are the sort who they want to charge a very high premium for, not give them discounts.
It's a shame because the Railcard system is a complete mess, and it could be resolved by having one product with common T&Cs, the price of the product could vary depending on eligibility. Won't happen though!