• Our booking engine at tickets.railforums.co.uk (powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

China travels

Status
Not open for further replies.

SouthDevonian

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2015
Messages
111
Location
West Glos
H-HST Beijing station1.JPG I recently returned from a trip around China which involved 2 rail journeys. The first was on a HST from Beijing West to Xi'an North using what appears to have been a Chinese built Fuxing train. The second was on a classic (overnight) train from Xi'an to Shanghai (train no. Z94). Owing to tight time constraints I did not get a chance to see the loco which hauled us and which was quickly taken off & away at Shanghai or get a count of the number of coaches. Does anyone know what loco type would have been used?
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

class387

Established Member
Joined
9 Oct 2015
Messages
1,525
According to Chinese Wikipedia (https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Z92/93、Z94/91次列车), train Z94 is booked to run with a HXD3D loco with 18 Series-25T coaches.

1024px-HXD3D_0054%40BJX_%2820170225094049%29.jpg


The Fuxing was a CR400AF - one of the best high speed trains in the world IMO, especially in Business Class.
 

SouthDevonian

Member
Joined
30 Apr 2015
Messages
111
Location
West Glos
Many thanks for the info - especially so quickly.

Also, I hadn't realised there was such a thing as Chinese Wikipedia.
 

paddington

Member
Joined
19 Feb 2013
Messages
964
Also, I hadn't realised there was such a thing as Chinese Wikipedia.

There are wikipedias in all sorts of languages, including (I think) 6 native UK languages. There are wikipedias in 7 Chinese languages, plus a Classical Chinese (Literary Sinitic) wikipedia, which has a UK equivalent - the Anglo-Saxon / Old English wikipedia.

Apart from topics on things that are actually specifically Chinese such as history, geography, culture etc., the Standard Chinese wikipedia is not great, because the people who have taken control / have high levels of activity on there seem to feel that it needs to be as close as possible a direct translation of the English wikipedia, and feel unable to explain topics without reference to English. Other wikipedias tend to grow in their own direction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Top