• Our new ticketing site is now live! Using either this or the original site (both powered by TrainSplit) helps support the running of the forum with every ticket purchase! Find out more and ask any questions/give us feedback in this thread!

Class 175 future speculation

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,842
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"
But also aren’t gangwayed so still potentially a problem.

Northern now uses non-gangwayed units with SDO on the Windermere branch, if you're in the wrong bit you can't get out. It'd be interesting to know how much of an issue that actually causes - as the small stations are primarily for locals probably not a massive one.
 
Sponsor Post - registered members do not see these adverts; click here to register, or click here to log in
R

RailUK Forums

HamworthyGoods

Established Member
Joined
15 Jan 2019
Messages
4,219
Northern now uses non-gangwayed units with SDO on the Windermere branch, if you're in the wrong bit you can't get out. It'd be interesting to know how much of an issue that actually causes - as the small stations are primarily for locals probably not a massive one.

GWR also uses it themselves on 80x trains with non Gangwayed units, where trains formed of 10 cars stop at stations such as Hayle, Ivybridge and Dawlish Warren with only the front unit opening.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,187
Location
Somerset
GWR also uses it themselves on 80x trains with non Gangwayed units, where trains formed of 10 cars stop at stations such as Hayle, Ivybridge and Dawlish Warren with only the front unit opening.
As long as it’s announced in plenty of time (including on-station at all previous calls) it shouldn’t be too much of an issue.
 

Rich McLean

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2012
Messages
1,697
Currently the Castles are 4 car and the IETs are 5 car (with a carriage and a half taken up by First Class anyway) so I would image 3 or 4 car (2x2) 175s would be sufficient?
For the most part. On a nice summers day, not unsual for a 5 car on a through working to be full and standing. Most will be suffient as a 3 car, but with a few 4 or 5 car services, splitting and joining to best meet demand.
 

TheWalrus

Established Member
Joined
6 Oct 2008
Messages
2,017
Location
UK
For the most part. On a nice summers day, not unsual for a 5 car on a through working to be full and standing. Most will be suffient as a 3 car, but with a few 4 or 5 car services, splitting and joining to best meet demand.
Will be interesting to see how they work it. I’m guessing GWR must have some ideas on how they will do it.
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,985
Northern now uses non-gangwayed units with SDO on the Windermere branch, if you're in the wrong bit you can't get out. It'd be interesting to know how much of an issue that actually causes - as the small stations are primarily for locals probably not a massive one.
Aren't the intermediate stations 4 coaches long for SDO, meaning you can get out from either unit provided you move to the front of the second one.
 

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,854
Location
Northern England
Aren't the intermediate stations 4 coaches long for SDO, meaning you can get out from either unit provided you move to the front of the second one.
Don't think so - when TPE used to run 185s, which are also 3×23m, up that branch, I recall it being local door release only at Burneside and Staveley. (185s have SDO now, but they may not have done at the time or perhaps it doesn't work on a single unit for some reason)
 

LowLevel

Established Member
Joined
26 Oct 2013
Messages
7,985
Don't think so - when TPE used to run 185s, which are also 3×23m, up that branch, I recall it being local door release only at Burneside and Staveley. (185s have SDO now, but they may not have done at the time or perhaps it doesn't work on a single unit for some reason)
The sectional appendix has the usable length of each platform as between 92 and 95 metres which should just about permit a 4 car operation with class 195 door spacings.

Northern conductors work from the back set only on multiple units so to run 6 cars to Windermere they'd either have to lock out the rear set, or be able to open at least 4 coaches I'd have thought?

I'm sure 3 car 175s used to go up there without an issue in FNW/TPE days?
 

RPI

Established Member
Joined
6 Dec 2010
Messages
2,915
GWR also uses it themselves on 80x trains with non Gangwayed units, where trains formed of 10 cars stop at stations such as Hayle, Ivybridge and Dawlish Warren with only the front unit opening.
Also Hungerford where, if first class is at the front of the rear set on the down, passengers can't alight from the rear set! (I've seen this happen so many times!)

There seems to be a suggestion doing the rounds that the Cardiff-Penzance service will be split at Exeter, if that's the case then a three car west of Exeter would probably suffice on most services, though I'm not sure of the legitimacy of this suggestion.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,187
Location
Somerset
Also Hungerford where, if first class is at the front of the rear set on the down, passengers can't alight from the rear set! (I've seen this happen so many times!)

There seems to be a suggestion doing the rounds that the Cardiff-Penzance service will be split at Exeter, if that's the case then a three car west of Exeter would probably suffice on most services, though I'm not sure of the legitimacy of this suggestion.
A Cardiff - Exeter stopper (including Wellington and Cullompton as, when and if) alongside a Bristol - Penzance running fastish to Exeter would probably be OK from a passenger perspective. Just splitting at Exeter is not and is a recipe for stupid loadings on XC for shortish journeys across the divide.
 

Xavi

Member
Joined
17 Apr 2012
Messages
718
There seems to be a suggestion doing the rounds that the Cardiff-Penzance service will be split at Exeter
It’s likely rumour stems from the planned extension of Cardiff to Taunton services to Exeter to provide the hourly service for Wellington. I would be very surprised if a full split of the timetable happened as the enhanced Cardiff-Penzance service has generated considerable new business for GWR.
 

CptCharlee

Member
Joined
31 Jan 2018
Messages
123
So many people west of Exeter use the Cardiff service to go to Bristol. Cutting it at Exeter would be bad. As mentioned beforehand the Crosscountry service would suffer.

Yeah Cardiff-Penzance has been a massive success for GWR. Connectivity has increased so much between many communities. There's a massive market from Devon and Cornwall to Bristol.
 

Topological

Established Member
Joined
20 Feb 2023
Messages
1,426
Location
Swansea
Surely, in the hours where the train is Cardiff to Penzance, it would just pick up the extra local stops. The Cardiff to Penzance is already slow between Bristol and Taunton, so it is unlikely to put many off with two extra stops.

IF the training process for 175s requires a split at Exeter then it will provide an indication to GWR about the effect of a longer-term split.
 

irish_rail

On Moderation
Joined
30 Oct 2013
Messages
4,175
Location
Plymouth
There's a massive market from Devon and Cornwall to Bristol.
There is, but what is needed is quick trains between the two. The current Penzance to Cardiff stoppers are pretty unattractive really for travellers from anywhere west of Exeter travelling to Bristol (or indeed Cardiff which is similarly popular). We need a service that is fast from Taunton to Bristol, perhaps allowing for say a stop at Weston-super-Mare, but not these all stations trains that take literally twice as long as the XC alternative.
 

TheGuy77

Member
Joined
21 Apr 2024
Messages
116
Location
Plusnet Call Centre
I was thinking about putting these trains on the Liverpool-Norwich line to replace EMR's 158s (they don't plan to run 170s on that route). It seems like a regional-express train so would be perfect for that route.
 

FrodshamJnct

Established Member
Joined
14 Apr 2019
Messages
3,692
Location
Cheshire
I was thinking about putting these trains on the Liverpool-Norwich line to replace EMR's 158s (they don't plan to run 170s on that route). It seems like a regional-express train so would be perfect for that route.

They already use 170s on that route. Have seen plenty of EMR 170s at Lime St.
 

bspahh

Established Member
Joined
5 Jan 2017
Messages
1,951
I was thinking about putting these trains on the Liverpool-Norwich line to replace EMR's 158s (they don't plan to run 170s on that route). It seems like a regional-express train so would be perfect for that route.

This will not work. 175s are not allowed to use sprinter differentials (too heavy?). They would have to run at lower speeds on the Breckland line

https://www.railforums.co.uk/threads/class-175-future-speculation.218095/page-47#post-6466658 discusses this
 

Bletchleyite

Veteran Member
Joined
20 Oct 2014
Messages
101,842
Location
"Marston Vale mafia"

py_megapixel

Established Member
Joined
5 Nov 2018
Messages
6,854
Location
Northern England
Yes, the 170s are already in service on some Liverpool-Norwich runs and they work very well. With the interior done up a bit they will be perfect for the line and we need more of them, not less.
 

REVUpminster

Member
Joined
3 Jan 2021
Messages
795
Location
Paignton
Splitting train is not a good idea. Where would you do it at Exeter; platform 6?

I remember often getting a 9 car 159 from Waterloo, dropping three cars at Salisbury. The rest splitting at Exeter with 3 cars going to Plymouth and 3 cars going to Paignton. There were a lot less trains in those days between Exeter and Paignton/Plymouth.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,187
Location
Somerset
Splitting train is not a good idea. Where would you do it at Exeter; platform 6?

I remember often getting a 9 car 159 from Waterloo, dropping three cars at Salisbury. The rest splitting at Exeter with 3 cars going to Plymouth and 3 cars going to Paignton. There were a lot less trains in those days between Exeter and Paignton/Plymouth.
The reference was to splitting the service, not trains.
 

The exile

Established Member
Joined
31 Mar 2010
Messages
4,187
Location
Somerset
Another week goes by and still nothing confirmed from GWR. Will believe it when I see it.
To make any public announcement now, even if all the i’s were dotted and the t’s crossed, would only be raising expectations prematurely.
 

HSTfan!!!

Established Member
Joined
11 Jun 2005
Messages
1,974
Another week goes by and still nothing confirmed from GWR. Will believe it when I see it.
Whilst I’ve not seen nothing official from the company, there has been recent mention of training and usage of them to drivers by Aslef in an email in the last week.
 

Rich McLean

Established Member
Joined
6 Feb 2012
Messages
1,697
As for the split of through workings, its more likely to take place at Plymouth for capacity reasons, with 80x forwards, with some 175s working to and from exeter on selected workings. Eventually once enough train crew are trained, 175s will work all the way to Cardiff.
 

Philip

On Moderation
Joined
27 May 2007
Messages
3,715
Location
Manchester
Do the 175s have the same engines, exhausts & transmission now that they had when new, and do they sound the same? I've seen some old videos in the FNW days and they seemed to sound a little different & louder then, but I guess this might be the recording quality.
 

61653 HTAFC

Veteran Member
Joined
18 Dec 2012
Messages
18,164
Location
Yorkshire
Do the 175s have the same engines, exhausts & transmission now that they had when new, and do they sound the same? I've seen some old videos in the FNW days and they seemed to sound a little different & louder then, but I guess this might be the recording quality.
They've had various modifications over the years, but nothing as dramatic as replacing engines and transmission systems wholesale (something that did happen with the early-built 170s which had the engines replaced). The differences you've observed are probably a combination of the recording quality (as you suggest) and multiple smaller changes over the years that overall make some difference to the sound. Along with drivers getting more familiar with the idiosyncrasies of the units and how they operate. When new these units were notoriously troublesome and unreliable, and it took a good while and a fair bit of work to get them to perform close to intended.
 

Top