Class 345 progress

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by samuelmorris, 2 Sep 2015.

  1. samuelmorris

    samuelmorris Established Member

    Messages:
    3,184
    Joined:
    18 Jul 2013
    Location:
    Brentwood, Essex
    Apologies if this has been posted elsewhere, but I've had a good long search and can't really find much on it.

    With introduction of the Class 700 and 800 under 2 years away there are already examples of the classes in the country undergoing testing. I realise the 700s are due in service earlier, and the 800s have a bit more to test, but it seems like it's getting fairly late in the day without a peep about the first 345 unit being prepared. Does anyone have any info on when the first signs of the first unit are likely to show up? 20 months from their entry into service it seems remarkably quiet regarding this class!
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. 61653 HTAFC

    61653 HTAFC Established Member

    Messages:
    9,773
    Joined:
    18 Dec 2012
    Location:
    Another planet...
    Hasn't Litchurch Lane been rather busy with finishing off the S-Stock and 378 extra car orders? I imagine they'll be cracking on with the Crossrail order once those jobs are done, though there's probably a fair bit of preparation (jigs etc.) already taking place behind the scenes.
     
  4. 158722

    158722 Member

    Messages:
    778
    Joined:
    8 Nov 2009
    The extra 378 cars must just be about done - notes elsewhere that most of the outstanding ones are ready and stored at Derby until required by LOROL, as there is not sufficient stabling space for all sets to go to 5-cars at present.

    The first unit of the 27 Southern/Gatwick Express 387/2s is almost ready, to be followed by the extra 8x units for Great Western. Presumably the 345 build prep will be underway, ready to start in full once the 387 orders have been completed next year.
     
  5. Philip Phlopp

    Philip Phlopp Established Member

    Messages:
    2,365
    Joined:
    31 May 2015
    They've not yet finished (as in they've only just started) building the new assembly buildings where these units will be built/assembled and tested. The building itself is due for completion in 'winter 2016' (yes, beware of seasonal timeframes) and it's being built by Balfour Beatty (yes, also beware of BB).

    I'm led to believe the new building is only needed for full scale production and that the 'pre-production' unit(s) will come from the existing facility before spending some time at Old Dalby, which has a nice mix of the OLE types the unit will encounter in daily use (Series 1, ROC and legacy)
     
  6. hwl

    hwl Established Member

    Messages:
    3,294
    Joined:
    5 Feb 2012
    And lots of 4car Aventra units to build for London Overground too (Class 710?)
     
  7. samuelmorris

    samuelmorris Established Member

    Messages:
    3,184
    Joined:
    18 Jul 2013
    Location:
    Brentwood, Essex
    As Philip says, I'm not expecting volume production this early, but it seemed odd to have heard nothing but one or two test units.
     
  8. 61653 HTAFC

    61653 HTAFC Established Member

    Messages:
    9,773
    Joined:
    18 Dec 2012
    Location:
    Another planet...
    AIUI the plan was to introduce the 345s to Liverpool Street suburban services prior to the Crossrail core being opened. If they're a bit late, those services can continue with the current stock so there's no major rush. With electrification being late/cancelled everywhere there's no knock-ons caused by the 315s etc being released late either.
     
  9. Class377/5

    Class377/5 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,594
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    The first 345 is due in service in May 2017. First unit should be completed next year with mainline testing starting late 2016 at the eariest.

    IEP is different as initial units are being built in Japan then shipped over. In fact the factory that going to build most of the fleet has only just been completed.

    The 700 order is twice the size of the 345 (1140 carriages vs 594) with a time frame similar to Crossrail's, hence Siemens starting asap (first build parts began before contract was signed off).

    The three builds are very different and you can't always compare the builds due to this.

    Oh and the first 700 in service is less tan a year away not two.
     
    Last edited: 3 Sep 2015
  10. swt_passenger

    swt_passenger Veteran Member

    Messages:
    19,647
    Joined:
    7 Apr 2010
    As you say, and the 345 is probably not as much of a step change from the stuff Bombardier is already building, so realistically it will just take its turn after the next batches of 387s and then the LO order.

    No need to worry yet.
     
  11. 321over360

    321over360 Member

    Messages:
    95
    Joined:
    17 Jul 2015
    Im sure production will be started soon though with the first due into service still 2 years away on the GEML, they have time to finish off the existing orders then make a start on the 345s, just a shame they don't start them sooner so they can get bedded in before the full route is operating, I mean, a few initial issues wont be any issue to GEML users given that line is dogged with faulty rolling stock anyway
     
  12. Jedipickles

    Jedipickles Member

    Messages:
    163
    Joined:
    18 Oct 2011
    Location:
    Kent
  13. Domh245

    Domh245 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,601
    Joined:
    6 Apr 2013
    Location:
    Wolverhampton
    Looks like a driving unit to me. It also really looks like a stretched S stock!
     
  14. Haydn1971

    Haydn1971 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,050
    Joined:
    11 Dec 2012
    Location:
    Sheffield
  15. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,354
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
    Knowing Bombardier, that's how they'll come back to the factory ;)
     
  16. Philip Phlopp

    Philip Phlopp Established Member

    Messages:
    2,365
    Joined:
    31 May 2015
  17. fgwrich

    fgwrich Established Member

    Messages:
    5,098
    Joined:
    15 Apr 2009
    Location:
    Between Edinburgh and Exeter
    :lol:

    With or without the buttons attached?

    In all seriousness though, I wonder which layout would work better for the future with further passenger increases due - That of the Siemens Desiro City for Thameslink, The 345 of CrossRail with it's 3 doors or Alstom's rather cleverly designed approach on it's X-Tropolis mock up (2 doors per side but together with full interconnecting corridors per coach/train).

    http://www.railwaygazette.com/news/single-view/view/alstom-unveils-xtrapolis-uk.html
     
  18. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,354
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
    Looking like that bodyshell again I mean, once our good punters of the east have stripped them down :D

    All the types you've listed have full-width gangways, as pioneered in the Class 378. The Class 345 Aventra specifically has three sets of doors per coach side because carriage length has been increased to 23m, hence the order being reduced to 9-car trains. The Aventra for London Overground (Class 710?) reverts to 4x20m coaches and a standard mainline door configuration.
     
  19. 47802

    47802 On Moderation

    Messages:
    3,455
    Joined:
    8 Oct 2013
    Is not that part of the point of Aventra to be more flexible on door config?

    Clearly a 23m Metre train with 3 doors per carriage may be better for some Metro routes that can accommodate a 23m train.
     
    Last edited: 10 Sep 2015
  20. jopsuk

    jopsuk Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,906
    Joined:
    13 May 2008
    It does, in part, depend upon how the tender is set up. In the case of Crossrail it was for a 200m train, not a 10x20m train. So the Class 345 gives 27 sets of doors in that 200m train, whilst 10x20m with two doors per carriage would have been 20 doors.
     
  21. Philip Phlopp

    Philip Phlopp Established Member

    Messages:
    2,365
    Joined:
    31 May 2015
    54 sets of doors (versus 40 sets of doors for a 10 x 20m train) is going to need some on the ball maintenance, or we'll have these train sets sitting down everywhere with traction interlocking failures.

    The upside is with so much running in tunnels, the door mechanisms should hopefully pick up less detritus than a comparable ThamesLink unit, and in winter, water ingress and ice build up around the doors should be less of an issue.
     
  22. 3141

    3141 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,327
    Joined:
    1 Apr 2012
    Location:
    Overton, Hampshire
    For a train that's going to run through central area tunnels and stations which are likely to be very busy, I think the three doors per side of class 345 are absolutely necessary, even though the additional vestibule means that seating capacity will be lower.

    A key factor is how far passengers are from the nearest door. With only two doors per side there is more reluctance to pass down inside, because you may get further from the doors and have difficulty getting out at your stop. For those who are further inside the train, including those who are seated, it will also take a few seconds longer to get to the doors when you are leaving.

    I shall be very interested to see how well the new Thameslink trains, with only two doors per side, meet the specification for alighting and boarding times.
     
  23. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,354
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
    With doors that are wider than on just about any other mainline train we've seen before, as Geoff Marshall from Londonist so brilliantly demonstrates.
     
  24. Class377/5

    Class377/5 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,594
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    The Desiro Cities allow three people to pass without touching. We used two larger bodied people with a third person and didn't touch. Current stock allows two so you've got 50% increase there alone.

    However the Crossrail carriage shown off isn't for passengers folks.

    https://tfl.gov.uk/info-for/media/press-releases/2015/crossrail-trains-take-shape

     
  25. D365

    D365 Established Member

    Messages:
    6,354
    Joined:
    29 Jun 2012
  26. Class377/5

    Class377/5 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,594
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    Er TfL ordered an extra unut awhile back. Can't remember why tho.
     
  27. 3141

    3141 Established Member

    Messages:
    1,327
    Joined:
    1 Apr 2012
    Location:
    Overton, Hampshire


    Well, I certainly hope the door capacity is sufficient, because with 24 trains per hour station dwell times have to be short.

    Comparing classes 345 and 700, we have

    345: length 205m., 27 doors per side, 2 people per door = 54 passing through.
    700: length of 10 coaches (out of 12) 200m., 20 doors per side, 3 people per door = 60 passing through.

    So class 700 should have the edge, but that does assume that people will pass through the wider doorways in threes as itÂ’s planned they should.
     
  28. 306024

    306024 Established Member

    Messages:
    2,450
    Joined:
    23 Jan 2013
    Location:
    East Anglia
    The extra unut is for the extension to Reading.
     
  29. Class377/5

    Class377/5 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,594
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    Thanks.
     
  30. absolutelymilk

    absolutelymilk Established Member

    Messages:
    1,109
    Joined:
    18 Jul 2015
    When will the first 345 be complete and out for testing?
     
  31. Class377/5

    Class377/5 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,594
    Joined:
    19 Jun 2010
    I believe its the second half of the year as they arent due in service for over a year.
     

Share This Page