IamTrainsYT
Member
Hia, anybody know the reason for a class 365’s move from Crewe south yard - longsight last night was?
Right, so Longsight is an Alstom facility. Some kind of refurbishment or recommissioning work?
I know alsthom where supposed to be fitting ETCS to the 365s, so they may finally be doing this. The only other thing I can think of would be work being done on the traction packages.Right, so Longsight is an Alstom facility. Some kind of refurbishment or recommissioning work?
The movement started at Crewe, that would suggest it being one of the units in storage.I know alsthom where supposed to be fitting ETCS to the 365s, so they may finally be doing this. The only other thing I can think of would be work being done on the traction packages.
Perhaps it could be re-activation of a stored unit to provide fleet cover for the ETCS fitment programme?The movement started at Crewe, that would suggest it being one of the units in storage.
Looks like it was 365525 (not my photo)Which one(s) ?
They could just be using a stored unit to see how the new systems will work and to see if there are any major problems.The movement started at Crewe, that would suggest it being one of the units in storage.
Minus the fire damage, one would hope.Showing the effects of weathering already, a little way to go before the full 90050 effect
I suspected that was what the unit was there for. It will be interesting to see how ETCS works with an older unit. I assume this will also include some form of automatic train operation?The 365 is at Longsight for the first-in-class fitment of ETCS equipment by Alstom.
A NR 313 has it installed.. so its more than possible.I suspected that was what the unit was there for. It will be interesting to see how ETCS works with an older unit. I assume this will also include some form of automatic train operation?
I don't think 365s will need ATO, not sure that's the plan for the ECML South, is it? And they certainly won't be going through the Core.
ETCS level 2, to be fitted on the ECML, allows signals to be abolished as long as all the trains using that route have the appropriate on-board equipment. This saves some cost (but adds cost for other equipment) and increases capacity a little. I believe this is the intention south of Peterborough, with the Peterborough area retaining signals presumably for the EMR and Anglia units. The Regulator requires cab signalling (such as this system) for operation above 125mph, but given the many other works that would be needed and the capacity implications of speeding up the fastest trains, I doubt we will see it here any time soon.I think you must be right - I found this article that seems to suggest that the ETCS will just be used for in-cab signalling and monitoring the drivers speed. So it’s basically just a more modern version of ATP. It also says that it could be possible for the 91s to run over 125 mph. The article is two years old though so the plans may have changed.![]()
The digital railway - progresses to the East Coast Main Line - Rail Engineer
Listen to this article Following on from the successful, world-first deployment of Automatic Train Operation (ATO) with the European Train Control System (ETCS) on the mainline railway in passenger service through the Thameslink core, the focus moves to the planned £1.8 billion East Coast main...www.railengineer.co.uk
Though I suppose it could be authorised on plain-line sections for delay recovery, even if the timetable remains 125mph.ETCS level 2, to be fitted on the ECML, allows signals to be abolished as long as all the trains using that route have the appropriate on-board equipment. This saves some cost (but adds cost for other equipment) and increases capacity a little. I believe this is the intention south of Peterborough, with the Peterborough area retaining signals presumably for the EMR and Anglia units. The Regulator requires cab signalling (such as this system) for operation above 125mph, but given the many other works that would be needed and the capacity implications of speeding up the fastest trains, I doubt we will see it here any time soon.
That depends on whether there is enough clear line to make it worth the expense, but that's for another discussion.Though I suppose it could be authorised on plain-line sections for delay recovery, even if the timetable remains 125mph.
It could, but that would require the many other measures I mentioned, including things like:Though I suppose it could be authorised on plain-line sections for delay recovery, even if the timetable remains 125mph.
Dragged by a 37I assume this moved to Longsight under its own power?
Thank YouDragged by a 37
Some sort of recommissioning I would assume.New Picture:-
Manchester. | Former Great Northern and briefly operated by … | Flickr
Looks like it is having some kind of maintenance to the traction equipment.