Class 378's to be shortened to 4 cars and used on GOBLIN?

Discussion in 'Traction & Rolling Stock' started by MatthewRead, 26 Dec 2018.

  1. MatthewRead

    MatthewRead On Moderation

    Messages:
    1,141
    Joined:
    21 Nov 2014
    Apparently class 378's are to be used on the Gospel Oak-Barking line as a stop gap measure they will be shortened to 4 carriages as the terminal platform at Barking cannot accommodate 5 car trains is this true?
     
  2. Registered users do not see these banners - join or log in today!

    Rail Forums

     
  3. XCTurbostar

    XCTurbostar Member

    Messages:
    826
    Joined:
    13 Sep 2014
    It is true.
    Quote from the 710 Thread
     
  4. Starmill

    Starmill Events Co-ordinator

    Messages:
    11,840
    Joined:
    18 May 2012
    Location:
    Manchester
    While this is quite true, what is the typical loading on a train between Surrey Quays and New Cross, or between Sydenham and Crystal Palace? Not at all high, I would be willing to bet.

    It could cause unusually high loadings elsewhere of course and it may result in annoying gaps. Guess we will see if they issue any timetable changes.
     
  5. Class 170101

    Class 170101 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,452
    Joined:
    1 Mar 2014
    Is there enough slack in the Class 378 fleet for the number of extra trains needed to cover the service without affecting existing Class 378 operated routes?
     
  6. 87015

    87015 Established Member

    Messages:
    4,132
    Joined:
    3 Mar 2006
    Location:
    GEML/WCML/SR
    232 has been done as a proof of concept (for now) by pausing the refresh program.
     
  7. robert7111a

    robert7111a Established Member

    Messages:
    1,918
    Joined:
    24 Apr 2014
    Location:
    PTSO or platform depending on the weather
    Will the cars removed be the MOSB in the 34xxx series as these were the last augmentation vehicles to be inserted when units were originally made up to 5-car?
     
    Last edited: 26 Dec 2018
  8. LeeLivery

    LeeLivery Member

    Messages:
    922
    Joined:
    13 Jul 2014
    Location:
    London
    Seems like a bad idea for us on the ELL and the NLL which is even more rammed.

    Simplistic answer: LO borrows some of the Gatwick Express 387s from GTR; shortening the 12 car diagrams to 8, reducing the amount of fresh air being moved between Victoria and Gatwick Airport every 15 minutes. Probably could get enough for at least a half hourly Goblin frequency. I know, never going to happen...

    No more than 20 off peak between Sydenham and Palace, helped by Southern services as well. But reducing Sydenham services in the peaks, especially evening, may cause real problems at Canada Water. If needs must, the New Cross services should be reduced; many can walk from New Cross Gate if needs be.
     
  9. AM9

    AM9 Established Member

    Messages:
    5,885
    Joined:
    13 May 2014
    Location:
    St Albans
    I doubt that Tfl would see increasing their bill for stock leasing as better than shuffling what they already have at their disposal, as a worthwhile idea.
     
  10. Kite159

    Kite159 Veteran Member

    Messages:
    11,685
    Joined:
    27 Jan 2014
    Location:
    West of Andover
    Barking isn't the issue, it is the bay at Gospel Oak which can only hold 4 carriages.

    (Not sure about the length of the platform at Barking but the 378s can use platform 7 which can hold at least 8 carriages).

    If London Overground need to free up units they could always cut down on the New Cross services.
     
  11. simple simon

    simple simon Member

    Messages:
    375
    Joined:
    13 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Suburban London
    So far only the one train, what happens after that depends on what happens with the 172s, 710s and the timescale.

    I wonder, to free up trains, maybe some Richmond trains could reverse at Gunnersbury? Even if this freed up one train, it could still help tremendously.

    Hopefully the paths (when in passenger service) of the 4 car Goblin 378's will become known.
     
  12. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    A quick glance at the map would suggest that New Cross LO is neither here nor there compared to either picking up the DLR at Lewisham or going through to London Bridge, especially that the ELL does pass through Zone 1 (Shoreditch High Street). Oh and before anyone mentions St. John's, it is even more not-here-nor-there (unless going to/through London Bridge or maybe leaving the railway at New Cross) given the proximity and of Elverson Road DLR, especially as the latter receives a very frequent service.
     
  13. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    Possible given that Gunnersbury is an island platform, but then it would have to stand on the Richmond-bound track (because that is the only way to reverse there).
     
  14. Starmill

    Starmill Events Co-ordinator

    Messages:
    11,840
    Joined:
    18 May 2012
    Location:
    Manchester
    I think you mean "between London and Brighton every half an hour, including some fully loaded peak 12 car diagrams"...

    Even if there were 6 daily diagrams where 12 coaches could be replaced with 8 without causing overcrowding, short forming their services in this way might breach GTR's franchise agreement.
     
    Last edited: 27 Dec 2018
  15. Starmill

    Starmill Events Co-ordinator

    Messages:
    11,840
    Joined:
    18 May 2012
    Location:
    Manchester
    That would annoy a lot of people travelling from Richmond.

    Is it even possible to do without re-timing some District line services?
     
  16. ijmad

    ijmad Member

    Messages:
    859
    Joined:
    7 Jan 2016
    Location:
    UK
    Agreed, the New Cross services seem like the obvious ones to chop, but Crystal Palace services run through Brockley and Honor Oak Park and are absolutely rammed in the high peaks.

    While 387s can't easily run on the GOBLIN itself or NLL, can they run on the WLL? 377s can since obviously Southern runs their Milton Keynes to West Croydon services along here. Could LO deploy borrowed 377s or 387s on this route to free up trains?
     
  17. 43096

    43096 Established Member

    Messages:
    3,851
    Joined:
    23 Nov 2015
    Better bet would be 387/1s off Great Northern, backfilled with the off-lease 365s.
     
  18. FelixtheCat

    FelixtheCat Established Member

    Messages:
    1,490
    Joined:
    23 Jul 2015
    Location:
    London, Edinburgh or somewhere else
    Incorrect. There are plenty of passengers on the New Cross trains. Most people use the Overground to change at Canda Water for the Jubilee Line.
     
  19. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    DLR from Lewisham to Canary Wharf or through to London Bridge for the Jubilee line? The former is about as fast with many more services on the first leg. Also it is quite easy to walk to New Cross Gate.
     
  20. FelixtheCat

    FelixtheCat Established Member

    Messages:
    1,490
    Joined:
    23 Jul 2015
    Location:
    London, Edinburgh or somewhere else
    And why should all the commuters do this? Can the DLR cope with the additional patronage? I can answer the last one: it can't. They are rammed during peaks, even with the Stratford services extending to Lewisham.
     
  21. MatthewRead

    MatthewRead On Moderation

    Messages:
    1,141
    Joined:
    21 Nov 2014
    C2C 387's would be an even better option particularly at weekends when they have no booked diagrams
     
  22. simple simon

    simple simon Member

    Messages:
    375
    Joined:
    13 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Suburban London
    I think that whatever is done will annoy someone, somewhere - this includes simply cancelling a few trains because the rolling stock has been sent somewhere else. There is no easy, cheap and quick solution which will also be popular with the passengers!
     
  23. LeeLivery

    LeeLivery Member

    Messages:
    922
    Joined:
    13 Jul 2014
    Location:
    London
    AH, I totally forgot they go to Brighton all day now, never mind.

    They shouldn't have to, but sometimes that's life. People manage to cope; we've had to put up with worse, including the suspension of the whole ELL once or twice in unforeseen circumstances.
     
  24. ijmad

    ijmad Member

    Messages:
    859
    Joined:
    7 Jan 2016
    Location:
    UK
    Presumably the 4-car 378 has already been withdrawn from its normal duties, so we should know by Wednesday next week when normal timetables are restored if any diagrams are being cancelled.
     
  25. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    The 172s ought to be released. Perhaps the mayor should be held responsible for what happens unless a solution can be figured out. He will figure something out soon enough.
     
  26. theking

    theking Member

    Messages:
    276
    Joined:
    30 Sep 2011
    Why are tfl going to risk annoying passengers in their main networks for a 2 car branch line that can easily be served by rail replacement buses.

    The new cross trains in the peaks take the people who can't physically fit onto the other services.
    Remove them and the other services will be late.
     
  27. Electrojuniper

    Electrojuniper Member

    Messages:
    26
    Joined:
    19 Dec 2018
    Understand 378232 is out on the dc network today.
     
  28. Dmthomson

    Dmthomson Member

    Messages:
    7
    Joined:
    21 Jun 2016
    Location:
    New Cross, London
    Yeah I tried going to New Cross Gate instead of New Cross a few years ago and I couldn't board any London Overground trains towards Dalston in the end had to take Southern, Southeastern to Cannon Street then Circle to Liverpool St and LO to Hackney Downs. Everything is crowded in the peaks around New Cross/Deptford/Surrey Quays in the peaks and this is the service that acts as our guaranteed train we can board.
     
  29. robert7111a

    robert7111a Established Member

    Messages:
    1,918
    Joined:
    24 Apr 2014
    Location:
    PTSO or platform depending on the weather
    Bummer, I'm in East Kent today, so hope it is out 2morrow, will take note which MSO has been removed, presume the 'B' one
     
  30. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    I find it hard to believe that there are more than a few such people, and surely fewer than use the GOBLIN.
     
  31. Jonny

    Jonny Established Member

    Messages:
    1,785
    Joined:
    10 Feb 2011
    Location:
    Walking distance to CLS
    Besides, a movement from New Cross to Surrey Quays conflicts with movements from Surrey Quays to New Cross Gate so it is an easy one to justify dropping from a purely occupational standpoint.
     

Share This Page